Search
Contact
14.10.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Tax dispute – Six percent interest on taxes is unconstitutional

Six percent interest on taxes is unconstitutional

Long criticized, now declared unconstitutional: In a decision published on August 18, 2021, the German Federal Constitutional Court declares interest on back taxes and tax refunds at an annual rate of 6% unconstitutional from 2014.

For some time now, taxpayers have been unable to understand the amount of interest that the tax office charges for back taxes.
In a decision published on August 18, 2021, the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) basically confirmed this legal perception and declared the interest on back taxes at 6% per year for interest periods from January 1, 2014 to be unconstitutional.

In order to achieve the goal of full interest, namely to compensate for the fact that taxes are assessed and due at different times for individual taxpayers, interest at a rate of 0.5% per month is no longer justified in the opinion of the BVerfG since 2014. In this regard, the BVerfG makes it very clear that the interest rate of 6% per year has been evidently unrealistic since 2014 at the latest. For interest periods prior to 2014, however, this interest rate roughly corresponded to the relevant conditions on the money and capital markets according to the decision and was therefore not unconstitutional for these periods.

The incompatibility of interest pursuant to § 233a AO with the Basic Law includes not only back taxes but also interest on refunds in favor of taxpayers.

For taxpayers affected by this decision, however, it should be noted that the BVerfG has also stated that the previous law will continue to apply to interest periods from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018. Only for interest periods falling in 2019 are the provisions inapplicable.

The legislature is now required to enact new legislation by July 31, 2022, which will apply retroactively to all interest periods beginning in 2019 and cover all sovereign acts that have not yet become final.

Explore #more

20.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest Column in it daily: The Business Judgment Rule and the Use of AI

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence presents corporate leadership with diverse and far-reaching decisions. These decisions concern not only the selection and deployment of appropriate…

19.10.2026 | In the media

New articles have been published in PERSONALFÜHRUNG

The current issue of PERSONALFÜHRUNG (10–11/2026) features two articles by female experts from KPMG and KPMG Law. In the article “Will AI Save the Day?…

15.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Faster Building Permits – Legal Options for Businesses

Planning and permitting procedures do not always have to delay construction projects. The law provides several options for expediting the process. To take advantage of…

09.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Claims Management for Cyber Incidents: How Insurers Actively Manage Claims

Cyber incidents are among the most complex claims scenarios for insurers. Ransomware attacks, in particular, can paralyze entire IT infrastructures—with enormous financial consequences. Insurers for …

08.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest Column in AUTOHAUS: Consumer Credit Directive: Sales Under New Circumstances

Car dealerships should use the time remaining before the new Consumer Credit Directive takes effect to systematically review their financing and sales processes for regulatory…

08.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview with HAUFE: Even If AI Makes a Mistake, the Board of Directors Is Still Liable

AI analyzes, makes recommendations, and helps make decisions. But who bears the consequences if it’s wrong? KPMG Law experts Nikolaus Vincent Manthey and Sabrina Riesenbeck…

30.09.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Mixed-Use Real Estate as an Opportunity for Downtown Areas

Downtown areas should be vibrant, sustainable, and attractive. But the traditional business model behind them—retail—is becoming less and less viable. Rents are high, customers are…

28.09.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG are advising Rohde & Schwarz on the acquisitions of NEOSAT and PHYTRONIC

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised the Munich-based technology group Rohde & Schwarz on its acquisitions of NEOSAT GmbH…

28.09.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG are advising Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Dr. Carls aerial imagery database

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Diehl Defence on its acquisition of the aerial imagery database Dr. Carls GmbH.…

26.09.2026 | In the media

Op-Ed in *Lebensmittelzeitung*: PPWR Introduces New Requirements for the Food Industry

The EU Packaging Regulation (PPWR) has been in effect since August 12, 2026—and presents companies in the food industry with a question that requires urgent…

Contact

Dr. Heiko Hoffmann

Partner
Munich site manager
Head of criminal tax law

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 59976061652
HHoffmann@kpmg-law.com

Arndt Rodatz

Partner
Head of criminal tax law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994 5081
arodatz@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll