08.01.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Money laundering – Transparency register and Corona assistance programs – Rapid examination and action required

Transparency Registry and Corona Assistance Programs – Rapid Review and Action Needed

Money laundering laws do not stop at Corona assistance programs. As part of the application for various Corona assistance, it is required that the applicant state “that it will provide owner transparency.” In this context, it is clear from the respective annexes to the implementation instructions for the granting of aid that “owner transparency” goes even further than what is required by the Money Laundering Act (GwG) with regard to the disclosure of beneficial owners. This concerns, for example, the so-called “Überbrückungshilfe II” as well as the “Novemberhilfe” and “Dezemberhilfe”.

This is also pointed out by the Lower Saxony Chamber of Tax Advisors in a notification dated December 22, 2020. Accordingly, an entry in the transparency register is required even if the company is not expressly exempted from Section 20 para. 1 AMLA is covered. In particular, civil law partnerships (GbRs) are mentioned as an example in the annex to the implementation instructions for Bridging Assistance II. Applicants for Corona assistance should therefore check whether their transparency register status meets current AMLA requirements or fulfills the requirements for “owner transparency”, which has been expanded in some cases.

Ensuring the Owner transparency – are the obligations that already existed fulfilled?

On the one hand, the annex to the enforcement instructions stipulates as a requirement that the actual ownership relationships of the applicants must be verified by entering their beneficial owners in the transparency register( within the meaning of Section 20 (1). 1 AMLA must be disclosed. An exception exists only in the case of the notification fiction of § 20 para. 2 GwG, if the information on the beneficial owners is derived from a document referred to in Section 20 para. 2 sentence 1 GwG (Commercial Register, Register of Partnerships, Register of Cooperatives, Register of Associations or Register of Companies) can be accessed electronically.

When submitting their application, companies should therefore make sure that they have complied with the obligation to report to the transparency register and that the information is (still) correct from the aforementioned registers.

In this context, particular attention should be paid to the FAQs of the Federal Office of Administration – as the competent authority for the prosecution and punishment of administrative offenses in connection with the Transparency Register – on the Money Laundering Act and the Transparency Register respectively (cf. see also our client information “Transparency Register – Update 2020“). In the FAQs updated on August 19, 2020, so-called negative control, e.g. in the form of a blocking minority, is also considered sufficient for the status of beneficial owner. This also applies to multi-level shareholding structures. Since corresponding agreements in the articles of association, partnership agreements or other contractual provisions are in part not recognizable to outsiders, a corresponding report may have to be submitted to the transparency register, since in such a case (in the opinion of the BVA) beneficial owners exist who are not evident from the registers.

With regard to the reporting obligations under money laundering law to the (German) transparency register, subsidiaries of foreign companies cannot refer to entries in foreign registers, so that it must also be checked here whether a reporting obligation to the transparency register exists and whether this has been fulfilled accordingly.

Obligation to register companies that are not required to report to the transparency register under money laundering law

On the other hand, the annex to the enforcement instructions states that the obligation to be entered in the transparency register in connection with the provision of support services also applies to applicant companies that are not expressly covered by Section 20 (1) AMLA (e.g. foreign companies with a permanent establishment in Germany, GbRs, but not registered traders). However, the obligation does not apply to foreign companies if they have already submitted corresponding information to another register of a member state of the European Union.

On this basis, when applying for Corona assistance programs, it may be necessary for GbRs in particular to have their beneficial owners entered in the transparency register if a corresponding owner transparency declaration is required as part of the application process. On the website of the Transparency Register(, it is generally possible to enter “other legal arrangements of any kind”. This must be done before applying for the Corona assistance programs, but in any case it should be done urgently if it was neglected when the application was submitted.

The experts in our practice group will be happy to support and advise you on the necessary review of legal issues in connection with the German Transparency Register.

Explore #more

01.12.2023 | PR publications

WiWo: Best of Legal Awards – Philipp Glock Leader of the Year

On Thursday evening, WirtschaftsWoche honored outstanding projects and minds from consulting firms and law firms in Düsseldorf and celebrated the second Best of Professional Night…

29.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights

Energy transition also opens up business opportunities

The energy industry’s complex, capital-intensive transformation process offers investors and banks a great deal of potential By Lars Christian Mahler and Marc Goldberg for Börsen-Zeitung,…

29.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights

Guest article in ZURe – AI and the legal department of tomorrow

The current issue of ZURe (p. 48 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Partner Sina Steidel-Küster (Regional Director Southwest, Head of Stuttgart office) and…

29.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

Key Facts about the new draft of the “Data Act

On February 23, 2022, the EU Commission presented the new draft of the so-called Data Act, the “Regulation on harmonized rules for fair access to…

21.11.2023 |

Guest article in ZURe on the implementation of CSRD reporting in SMEs

The current issue of ZURe (p. 34 ff.) contains a guest article by Lena Plato (Director Legal & Compliance, FLABEG Automotive Group GmbH), KPMG Law…

20.11.2023 | Press releases

Statement by KPMG Law experts in Handelsblatt on the topic of sustainability cooperation in antitrust law

In the Handelsblatt, KPMG Law expert Jonas Brueckner is quoted in detail on the subject of cooperation in terms of sustainability. Until this summer, there…

15.11.2023 |

Legal 500 – Country Comparative Guide Germany

Gerrit Rixen and Jonas Brueckner provide an overview of the relevant legal regulations in the area of Competition & Litigation in a practical guide on…

14.11.2023 | Press releases

Tax and Law at a glance – New issue of the digital magazine “Talk

“Talk” stands for Tax and Law Compass, because that’s what the digital magazine wants to be: a navigation aid to the legal and tax aspects…

13.11.2023 |

Statement from KPMG Law experts in Brand eins magazine on the use of AI

The business magazine brand eins asked eight experts about the use of AI in the legal sector. “Many business people cannot even begin to estimate…

10.11.2023 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft advise Ziemann Holvrieka on the acquisition of Künzel Maschinenbau

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Ziemann Holvrieka GmbH from Ludwigsburg on the acquisition of the majority of shares…


Dr. Heiko Hoffmann

Munich Site Manager
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

tel: +49 89 59976061652

Christian Judis

Senior Manager

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

tel: +49 89 59976061028

Anna Reimann

Senior Manager

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

tel: +49 89 59976061124

Arndt Rodatz

Head of Criminal Tax Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

tel: +49 40 360994 5081

© 2023 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.