Search
Contact
20.12.2013 | KPMG Law Insights

Higher education law: First calls for proposals for Horizon 2020 published

Dear Readers,

Just in time for Christmas or the turn of the year, the EU Commission has issued its new de minimis regulation. However, not to everyone’s delight: those of you who had an increase in the aid ceiling for de minimis aid on your wish list are now likely to be disappointed. Some things are changing, but the unpopular ceiling remains.

There are also exciting reports from the area of subsidies and public procurement law as well as from the ECJ. The latter has put the national courts in their place and made it unequivocally clear that, despite an investigation still underway in the same matter before the EU Commission, they must take all necessary measures to draw the consequences from any breach of the obligation to suspend implementation of this measure.

We wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year 2014!

Sincerely yours

Public Sector Team of KPMG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH

Mathias Oberndörfer Dr. Anke Empting

Lawyer Attorney

On December 12, 2013, the European Commission published the first calls for proposals based on the European Union’s new framework program for research and innovation – “Horizon 2020”.

The call texts and the current work programs for Horizon 2020 can be viewed on the online “Participant Portal” in the “Funding Opportunities” section. The German portal for Horizon 2020 will also go online at the same time. On horizont2020.de, interested parties can now access all basic information as well as contacts to advisory services such as the contact persons of the National Contact Points (NCP). The new portal provides information, for example, on structure, application and review procedures, and current events. The page will be continuously expanded with current information.

 

EU state aid law: EU Commission approves research aid on the basis of the EU state aid framework, citing existing market failure

The European Commission has approved aid granted by France in favor of a research and development project in the field of photovoltaic technology on the basis of the EU Framework for State Aid for Research and Development, citing an existing market failure and the absence of undue distortions of competition.

The aid measures are direct grants amounting to EUR 5.9 million and repayable advances amounting to EUR 15.4 million. The funded project will be carried out as a purely private collaboration between a French/international group of companies, a French SME and a French research institute.

Essential contents of the commission audit

The EU Commission examined the measure solely on the basis of the requirements of the EU Framework on State Aid for Research and Development.

It first came to the conclusion that the state subsidies meet the criteria for EU state aid. In the subsequent examination of the possible compatibility of the measure with the internal market, the EU Commission took a two-stage approach and first examined whether the state measure is intended to remedy an existing market failure and is necessary and appropriate for this purpose. In doing so, the EU Commission focused in particular on the current industry-specific market situation and the market shares of the parties involved. Among other things, it found that, on the one hand, the recipient companies did not hold a dominant position and, on the other hand, would not have carried out the cooperation in question in the same form without the state aid, which would have had a detrimental effect on the overall internal market as a result.

Following this proportionality test, the EU Commission finally determined in a second step the distortions of competition to be expected as a result of the aid and weighed these against the expected benefits of granting the aid for the EU’s internal market. The EU Commission came to the conclusion that the distortions of competition caused by the aid were “within bounds” and were acceptable compared with the benefits of the aid.

Significance for the funding practice

With this decision, the Commission illustrates its approach to the assessment of state R&D measures that meet the EU State aid criteria but may need to be justified under the EU State aid framework. It becomes clear that such a proof of justification, although costly, is in principle possible due to the concrete and objective specifications of the assessment steps under the EU state aid framework.

Explore #more

02.05.2026 | In the media

Guest article in IT Business: Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI

AI is increasingly becoming the basis for important business decisions. But what happens if the “black box” AI delivers faulty or inadequate results? Nikolaus Manthey

29.04.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

The Procurement Acceleration Act changes access to Bundeswehr contracts

The Planning and Procurement Acceleration Act, which came into force on February 14, 2026, is intended to significantly accelerate Bundeswehr procurement by allowing deviations from…

24.04.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Correct application of the Transport Block Exemption Regulation – Guidelines for public bodies

On March 16, 2026, the European Commission adopted a comprehensively renewed state aid framework for land and multimodal transport, which came into force on…

21.04.2026 | In the media

Guest article in HR Journal: Working without borders, limited legal certainty: Managing the risks of international remote work

Cross-border home office is strategically relevant – but also an underestimated area of risk. Between permanent establishment risk and residence law hurdles, companies are faced…

16.04.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Index clauses in commercial leases: BGH ruling opens up clawback risks for landlords

Value assurance provisions in the form of index clauses in standard commercial leases are not only subject to the restrictions of the Price Clause Act,…

16.04.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Beschaffung aktuell: Faster procurement for the Bundeswehr

With the Planning and Procurement Acceleration Act, the German government wants to make Bundeswehr procurement significantly faster. The temporary special law simplifies procurement procedures, allows…

09.04.2026 | Press releases

KPMG Law strengthens its insurance practice in Cologne with Dr. Julia Faenger

Since April 1, 2026, Dr. Julia Faenger, LL.M., has been strengthening the insurance law advice of KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) in Cologne as…

08.04.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

New Package Travel Directive 2026: Complaint management becomes mandatory

The EU is reforming the Package Travel Directive. The amendments were adopted by the European Parliament and Council in March 2026 and are expected to…

02.04.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Building Modernization Act (GMG): What is now important for companies

The planned Building Modernization Act (GMG) is set to replace significant parts of the previous Building Energy Act (GEG). Companies in the real estate industry,…

01.04.2026 | In the media

Manager Magazin: KPMG Law in first place for legal advice

Every two years, Manager Magazin, together with the Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Management und Beratung (WGMB), awards Germany’s best auditors with a “Best-in-Class” seal and evaluates

Contact

Mathias Oberndörfer

Managing Partner
Geschäftsführer KPMG Law
Bereichsvorstand Öffentlicher Sektor KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Theodor-Heuss-Straße 5
70174 Stuttgart

Tel.: +49 711 781923410
moberndoerfer@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll