Search
Contact
Symbolbild zum DAWI-Freistellungsbeschluss: Wohnblocks
15.01.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

New DAWI exemption decision enables promotion of affordable housing

Thanks to the new SGEI exemption decision, the public sector can more easily promote affordable housing for middle-income households. With the new version of December 16, 2025, the European Commission is expanding the scope of application and enabling compensation for the provision of affordable housing as a service of general economic interest (SGEI). Corresponding subsidies can therefore be granted without a complex notification procedure.

With the European Affordable Housing Plan, the European Commission is pursuing the goal of improving access to affordable housing in the EU and has amended the SGEI exemption decision to this end. In addition to social housing, the exemption from certain subsidies also facilitates the public financing of affordable housing for middle-income households. The new SGEI exemption decision (2025/2630) from December 16, 2025 replaces the previous decision from 2011 and came into force on January 8, 2026.

What changes does the new SGEI exemption decision for housing provide for?

Previously, only aid for social housing on the basis of an entrustment act was exempt from the notification and approval requirement. However, this only included housing for disadvantaged households or socially vulnerable groups who do not have the means to obtain accommodation on the open housing market.

Now an exemption is also possible for “affordable housing”.

What does affordability mean?

The EU Commission leaves the definition of affordability to the member states. When housing is affordable is to be determined by the respective authority at national, regional or local level on the basis of objective indicators. For example, the ratio of rent to income or the annual income required to buy a home can be used. The geographical scale to be taken into account here depends on the scope of the public funding in question and can be based on national, regional or local circumstances. The housing-related energy costs should also be taken into account. Social and affordable housing can also be realized in mixed projects with non-subsidized housing in the interest of inclusive neighborhoods. However, proper segregation of accounts is required to prevent cross-subsidization.

Who is the target group for affordable housing?

Who has access to affordable housing is primarily determined by household income compared to housing market prices. However, other circumstances, such as non-existing home ownership, may also be taken into account. Preferential access can be granted to people who typically have difficulties accessing the housing market, such as people with disabilities, senior citizens, students and single parents. In this context, privileged treatment can also be given to occupational groups of particular social importance (e.g. police, firefighters, teachers, social and childcare workers, nursing staff, etc.).

What compensation can now be granted without notification?

Compensation for the provision of affordable housing is eligible for funding. These can include the investment costs for new construction, the costs for the acquisition, conversion or refurbishment of apartments as well as adaptation measures with regard to accessibility requirements, environmental standards or climate resilience. If necessary, compensation can also be paid for operating costs. However, the amount of compensation may not exceed what is necessary to cover the costs of provision, including a reasonable profit (exclusion of overcompensation).

What requirements must be observed when entrusting?

In addition to the existing requirements for entrustment, competition must also be maintained in the area of affordable housing. Granting authorities must therefore ensure equal access for providers who are able to provide it. In this respect, the entrustment of an SGEI for affordable housing will regularly take place in the course of a support program with predetermined conditions of use or a competitive procedure. Details of the definition and determination of affordable housing and the compensation can be found in the annex to the SGEI exemption decision.

What new opportunities are there for public housing promotion?

The extension of the SGEI exemption opens up new opportunities and fields of activity for the public sector as well as for municipal, private or non-profit housing companies.

The public sector now has the opportunity to promote housing for other population groups not previously covered in accordance with state aid law. Particularly in conjunction with other innovations such as the “Bau-Turbo“, the public sector can and should review and adapt its strategies and concepts for short-term easing measures on the housing market. The new exemption decision also offers starting points for innovative and competitive procedures in order to use public funds for housing promotion as effectively as possible.

By providing affordable housing, housing companies can enrich their own portfolio of publicly subsidized housing with apartments that are more economically viable. Municipal housing companies in particular should enter into a short-term exchange with local authorities and local politicians in this regard.

 

Explore #more

15.09.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Reporting Deadlines for Cyber Incidents Under the GDPR, BSIG, and CRA—Every Hour Counts

After a cyber incident, companies have only 24 or 72 hours to file their initial report with the authorities. A single incident can trigger multiple…

11.09.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

The Procurement Acceleration Act and Sustainable Procurement: What Is Permitted and What Is Required?

The Public Procurement Acceleration Act took effect on July 1, 2026. The Act implements the reform of public procurement law that has been under discussion…

08.09.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises the shareholders and management of KODIAK on the sale of shares and the strategic partnership with Bencis

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) advised the shareholders and management of KODIAK GmbH (KODIAK) on the sale of shares to Bencis and the establishment…

07.09.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law advises Bosch Rexroth on the sale of its Active Shuttle product business to Neura Robotics

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) has provided legal counsel to Bosch Rexroth AG (Bosch Rexroth) in the sale of its product business related to…

31.08.2026 | In the media

Op-Ed in the Börsen-Zeitung – Interim Assessment of the European Crypto Regulation MiCAR

A year and a half after MiCAR took effect, it is clear that, despite European guidelines, there are still misunderstandings regarding the requirements. KPMG Law…

19.08.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in HAUFE: Even If AI Makes a Mistake, the Board of Directors Is Still Liable

AI analyzes, makes recommendations, and helps make decisions. But who bears the consequences if it makes a mistake? KPMG Law experts Vincent Manthey and Sabrina

19.08.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Article in Bloomberg Tax: Germany’s Tax Crime Action Plan Pushes the Boundaries of the Constitution

The new 26-point action plan against tax and financial crime, issued by Germany’s finance and justice ministries, signals a shift toward tougher sanctions, closer interagency…

13.08.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Federal Ministry of Finance Presents Draft Bill on Mandatory Use of Electronic Cash Registers and Combating Tax Evasion

In July 2026, the Federal Ministry of Finance (BMF) and the Federal Ministry of Justice (BMJV) presented an action plan to combat tax and financial

11.08.2026 | In the media

Guest article in *Versicherungsmonitor* on the topic of cyber claims regulation

Cyberattacks—particularly ransomware campaigns—pose challenges for insurers when it comes to claims settlement. When entire IT infrastructures at insured companies come to a standstill and the…

11.08.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Transparency Requirements Under Article 50 of the AI Act: Companies Should Address These Questions Now

The transparency requirements of the EU AI Act have been in effect since August 2, 2026. These obligations apply to chatbots, AI assistants, avatars, synthetic…

Contact

Dr. Magnus Auer

Senior Manager

Bahnhofstraße 30
90402 Nürnberg

Tel.: +49 911 800929923
magnusauer@kpmg-law.com

Andreas Fuchs

Senior Associate

Bahnhofstraße 30
90402 Nürnberg

Tel.: +49 911 800929933
andreasfuchs@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Barbara Kathrin Buhr

Partner

Bahnhofstraße 30
90402 Nürnberg

Tel.: +49 911 800929935
bbuhr@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Áron Horváth

Partner

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.: +49 30 530199129
aronhorvath@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll