Search
Contact
Symbolbild zum DAWI-Freistellungsbeschluss: Wohnblocks
15.01.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

New DAWI exemption decision enables promotion of affordable housing

Thanks to the new SGEI exemption decision, the public sector can more easily promote affordable housing for middle-income households. With the new version of December 16, 2025, the European Commission is expanding the scope of application and enabling compensation for the provision of affordable housing as a service of general economic interest (SGEI). Corresponding subsidies can therefore be granted without a complex notification procedure.

With the European Affordable Housing Plan, the European Commission is pursuing the goal of improving access to affordable housing in the EU and has amended the SGEI exemption decision to this end. In addition to social housing, the exemption from certain subsidies also facilitates the public financing of affordable housing for middle-income households. The new SGEI exemption decision (2025/2630) from December 16, 2025 replaces the previous decision from 2011 and came into force on January 8, 2026.

What changes does the new SGEI exemption decision for housing provide for?

Previously, only aid for social housing on the basis of an entrustment act was exempt from the notification and approval requirement. However, this only included housing for disadvantaged households or socially vulnerable groups who do not have the means to obtain accommodation on the open housing market.

Now an exemption is also possible for “affordable housing”.

What does affordability mean?

The EU Commission leaves the definition of affordability to the member states. When housing is affordable is to be determined by the respective authority at national, regional or local level on the basis of objective indicators. For example, the ratio of rent to income or the annual income required to buy a home can be used. The geographical scale to be taken into account here depends on the scope of the public funding in question and can be based on national, regional or local circumstances. The housing-related energy costs should also be taken into account. Social and affordable housing can also be realized in mixed projects with non-subsidized housing in the interest of inclusive neighborhoods. However, proper segregation of accounts is required to prevent cross-subsidization.

Who is the target group for affordable housing?

Who has access to affordable housing is primarily determined by household income compared to housing market prices. However, other circumstances, such as non-existing home ownership, may also be taken into account. Preferential access can be granted to people who typically have difficulties accessing the housing market, such as people with disabilities, senior citizens, students and single parents. In this context, privileged treatment can also be given to occupational groups of particular social importance (e.g. police, firefighters, teachers, social and childcare workers, nursing staff, etc.).

What compensation can now be granted without notification?

Compensation for the provision of affordable housing is eligible for funding. These can include the investment costs for new construction, the costs for the acquisition, conversion or refurbishment of apartments as well as adaptation measures with regard to accessibility requirements, environmental standards or climate resilience. If necessary, compensation can also be paid for operating costs. However, the amount of compensation may not exceed what is necessary to cover the costs of provision, including a reasonable profit (exclusion of overcompensation).

What requirements must be observed when entrusting?

In addition to the existing requirements for entrustment, competition must also be maintained in the area of affordable housing. Granting authorities must therefore ensure equal access for providers who are able to provide it. In this respect, the entrustment of an SGEI for affordable housing will regularly take place in the course of a support program with predetermined conditions of use or a competitive procedure. Details of the definition and determination of affordable housing and the compensation can be found in the annex to the SGEI exemption decision.

What new opportunities are there for public housing promotion?

The extension of the SGEI exemption opens up new opportunities and fields of activity for the public sector as well as for municipal, private or non-profit housing companies.

The public sector now has the opportunity to promote housing for other population groups not previously covered in accordance with state aid law. Particularly in conjunction with other innovations such as the “Bau-Turbo“, the public sector can and should review and adapt its strategies and concepts for short-term easing measures on the housing market. The new exemption decision also offers starting points for innovative and competitive procedures in order to use public funds for housing promotion as effectively as possible.

By providing affordable housing, housing companies can enrich their own portfolio of publicly subsidized housing with apartments that are more economically viable. Municipal housing companies in particular should enter into a short-term exchange with local authorities and local politicians in this regard.

 

Explore #more

30.10.2026 | Unkategorisiert

New Podcast in the Packaging Journal: PWR in Practice—Who Is Liable, Who Pays, and What Are the Current Rules?

The core obligations of the PPWR have been in effect since August 12, 2026. In the Packaging People podcast, Dr. Simon Meyer of KPMG Law…

29.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG and KPMG Law Article in *Betriebs-Berater*: Pitfalls in Customs Law

In light of geopolitical changes, new trade barriers, and more rigorous audits, customs and foreign trade law are increasingly becoming a focus for companies. The…

27.10.2026 | In the media

Op-Ed in Versicherungsmonitor: The Environment Is Finally Becoming a Compliance Risk

With the implementation of the new EU Environmental Criminal Law Directive, the environment is becoming a core area of managerial liability. Managers face reputational damage,…

27.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Federal Court of Justice on the Summary Report: Tax-Exempt but Still a Criminal Offense

Can someone be punished for sales tax evasion even if the sales were subsequently deemed tax-exempt? Yes, says the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) in…

23.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

PHP2Shell may trigger legal obligations for companies

Two critical vulnerabilities in the PHP programming language are threatening web applications and digital products worldwide. The Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) has warned…

20.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest Column in it daily: The Business Judgment Rule and the Use of AI

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence presents corporate leadership with diverse and far-reaching decisions. These decisions concern not only the selection and deployment of appropriate…

19.10.2026 | In the media

New articles have been published in PERSONALFÜHRUNG

The current issue of PERSONALFÜHRUNG (10–11/2026) features two articles by female experts from KPMG and KPMG Law. In the article “Will AI Save the Day?…

15.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Faster Building Permits – Legal Options for Businesses

Planning and permitting procedures do not always have to delay construction projects. The law provides several options for expediting the process. To take advantage of…

09.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Claims Management for Cyber Incidents: How Insurers Actively Manage Claims

Cyber incidents are among the most complex claims scenarios for insurers. Ransomware attacks, in particular, can paralyze entire IT infrastructures—with enormous financial consequences. Insurers for …

08.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest Column in AUTOHAUS: Consumer Credit Directive: Sales Under New Circumstances

Car dealerships should use the time remaining before the new Consumer Credit Directive takes effect to systematically review their financing and sales processes for regulatory…

Contact

Dr. Magnus Auer

Senior Manager

Bahnhofstraße 30
90402 Nürnberg

Tel.: +49 911 800929923
magnusauer@kpmg-law.com

Andreas Fuchs

Senior Associate

Bahnhofstraße 30
90402 Nürnberg

Tel.: +49 911 800929933
andreasfuchs@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Barbara Kathrin Buhr

Partner
Head of Legal Public Services

Bahnhofstraße 30
90402 Nürnberg

Tel.: +49 911 800929935
bbuhr@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Áron Horváth

Partner

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.: +49 30 530199129
aronhorvath@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll