Search
Contact
Symbolbild zum Bauturbo: Wohnblöcke
23.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the “construction turbo” means for municipalities and building supervisory authorities

The Bundestag has passed the “construction turbo” and local authorities can now significantly accelerate certain construction projects.

According to the law passed on October 9, 2025 to accelerate housing construction and secure housing, building supervisory authorities will be able to approve residential construction projects with the consent of the municipalities in future, even if they do not comply with existing development plans or other requirements of building planning law.

The new regulations at a glance

In addition to the “construction turbo”, the Act to Accelerate Housing Construction and Secure Housing also introduces various acceleration elements into the BauGB.

New deviation options through Section 246e BauGB (“construction turbo”)

However, the most far-reaching acceleration options are offered by the new Section 246e BauGB. According to this, it is possible to deviate from the provisions of the BauGB and the regulations issued on its basis. This includes development plans and other statutes as well as the provisions of the German Land Use Ordinance (BauNVO). However, deviations are only permitted for the creation of living space or the construction of new or the modification of existing buildings that serve residential purposes.

The authority must ensure that the project is compatible with neighboring interests and public concerns. The municipality must also give its consent. This is governed by the new Section 36a BauGB. The local authority can refuse consent on the basis of an assumed breach of the BauGB or for other reasons. Consent is deemed to have been granted if it is not refused within three months.

Extended exemption options (Section 31 (3) BauGB)

On the basis of the new Section 31 (3) BauGB, the building supervisory authorities can, for example, grant exemptions from the provisions of a development plan in future, even in several comparable cases and irrespective of the existence of a tight housing market.

Deviation from the insertion requirement in unplanned inner areas (Section 34 (3b) BauGB)

A new Section 34 (3b) BauGB makes it possible to deviate from the requirement of integration in unplanned inner areas in order to facilitate residential construction projects.

Easier handling of noise protection requirements (Section 9 (1) No. 23 (a), Section 216a BauGB)

Further changes concern regulations in connection with deviations from the TA-Lärm, which can be particularly relevant for inner-city densification projects.

 

This applies to the practical application

The new regulation raises a number of questions. Local authorities and building supervisory authorities should pay particular attention to the following points when applying the new regulations in practice:

  1. How environmental impacts are to be taken into account: The new simplifications may only be used if the projects are compatible with public interests, taking into account neighboring interests. In addition to Section 246e BauGB, this also applies to Sections 31 (3) and 34 (3b) BauGB. In the case of Section 31 (3) BauGB, the regulation expressly states that there is a lack of compatibility in particular if a rough assessment indicates that significant environmental impacts are to be expected. A rough environmental assessment is also necessary in the area of application of the “construction turbo”. If necessary, a strategic environmental assessment must be carried out in accordance with Sections 38 to 46 UVPG. If existing residential buildings are only modified, for example by adding a storey, only the environmental impact of the modification must be taken into account, not that of the original planning. In the case of new construction projects, on the other hand, it is not always immediately clear which environmental impacts should be included in the assessment and which should not. In cases of doubt, the building supervisory authorities should consult with the highest building supervisory authorities in their federal state. It also remains unclear which criteria should be used to assess the environmental impact. Annex 2 to the BauGB, which contains criteria for the rough assessment of the environmental impact of inner development plans in accordance with Section 13a BauGB, provides guidance in this respect.
  2. Scope for refusal: The municipality can refuse its consent if the project is not compatible with its ideas of urban development and order. In principle, it has a wide scope of discretion in this respect. However, it remains bound by the general principles of the rule of law, in particular the requirements of the principle of equality under Art. 3 GG.
  3. Granting consent subject to conditions: The local authority can make its approval in accordance with Section 36a (1) sentence 3 BauGB subject to the condition that the developer undertakes to comply with certain urban development requirements. Among other things, this may involve the conclusion of urban development contracts. This results in a wide range of design options in connection with the new regulations, which are, however, also accompanied by uncertainties regarding the legal framework to be complied with.
  4. Projects in outdoor areas: The “construction turbo” is primarily intended for indoor areas. The regulation can also be applied to outdoor projects if they are spatially connected to development plan areas or the unplanned inner area. The draft law does not clarify when a spatial connection exists. However, according to the explanatory memorandum, 100 m from the existing edge of a settlement is already too far.

How local authorities and building supervisory authorities should prepare for the “construction turbo”

To ensure that the new powers do not fail to achieve their purpose of accelerating housing construction, local authorities and building supervisory authorities should take preparatory measures:

  • Municipalities should determine in which areas of the municipal territory a deviation in favor of residential construction is possible. It can also be useful to develop abstract guidelines. These should contain clear criteria for the conditions under which deviations are approved. Legal advice can help to ensure consistent decision-making practice, taking into account the legal framework.
  • It may be advisable to secure and legitimize the guidelines by means of a basic resolution of the municipal council on how to deal with the new deviation powers.
  • Municipalities should involve relevant specialist departments at an early stage and clarify internal processes between building control and urban planning. This can make it easier to carry out a rough assessment of the likely environmental impact later on. Legal advice can help to align the processes within the approval procedure with the new legal framework.
  • It also makes sense to collect relevant environmental information in advance for the areas identified by the municipalities for the “construction turbo”. In this way, a suitable data basis can be established for the short-term implementation of rough environmental assessments.

The new regulations establish an approval regime that deviates from the previous system at key points. Considerable effort is required to familiarize oneself with this and to readjust the cooperation between planning authorities and building supervisory authorities. The measures listed above can provide assistance in this regard. Now that there is clarity about the legal changes, local authorities and approval authorities should lose no time in adapting to the new legal situation.

 

Read here how project developers, real estate companies, housing cooperatives, property developers and investors can benefit from the construction turbo.

 

Explore #more

12.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Focus offshore: NRW buys extensive tax data on international tax havens

According to recent press reports from December 11, 2025, the state of North Rhine-Westphalia has purchased an extensive data set with tax-relevant information from international…

12.12.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises The Chemours Company on the implementation and closing of a large-volume factoring financing

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft GmbH (KPMG Law) advised the US-American Chemours Company on the implementation of a cross-border factoring financing. The legal implementation was managed by…

11.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

Negotiators from the EU Parliament and the Council have now reached an agreement on the outstanding points of the first omnibus package. The content of…

11.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

IPCEI-AI: Requirements for funding and evaluation criteria

On December 5, 2025, the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy launched the expression of interest procedure for the “IPCEI Artificial Intelligence” (IPCEI-AI) funding…

11.12.2025 | In the media

Interview in TextilWirtschaft – What the relaxed EU supply chain law means for the industry

After weeks of debate, the weakened form of the CSDDD has now been adopted in Brussels. This brings new, complex legal uncertainties for companies, says…

02.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementation of the Pay Transparency Directive: what the expert commission recommends

The EU Pay Transparency Directive has been in force since June 2023 and must now be transposed into German law. In the coalition agreement,…

28.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest article Expert forum on employment law: Between theory and practice: The EU Blue Card and the right to short-term mobility within the EU

Nowadays, not only employees but also employers want to create more attractive working conditions. For some time now, so-called workstations / work-from-anywhere programs or other…

26.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

EU deforestation regulation forces companies to act

Anyone who trades in or uses the raw materials soy, oil palm, cattle, coffee, cocoa, rubber and wood and certain products made from them should…

25.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Special infrastructure assets: how the administration manages to implement projects quickly

The special infrastructure fund creates the opportunity to catch up on years of investment backlog. There is a need for urgency. Defence capability, economic growth…

21.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in Real Estate I Haufe: Substitute building materials: “Secondary is not second class”

The Substitute Building Materials Ordinance is intended to harmonize the circular economy in construction, but legal uncertainty and bureaucracy are holding it back. How can…

Contact

Dr. Simon Meyer

Partner

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 5997606 5021
simonmeyer@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Florian Gonsior

Senior Manager

Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

Tel.: +49 211 4155597-217
fgonsior@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll