Search
Contact
Symbolbild zu Videokonferenztechnik in Gerichtsprozessen: Frau nimmt an Videokonferenz teil
16.01.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Law to promote video conferencing technology in court proceedings

On November 17, 2023, the Bundestag passed a law to promote the use of video conferencing technology in civil and specialist courts. However, after the Bundesrat expressed reservations about the content, the Mediation Committee will first deal with the bill before the new rules can come into force.

The draft law aims to make the justice system more modern, digital and citizen-friendly. Video conferencing should become a natural part of everyday court life. Access to justice should be simple and modern for citizens. The use of video technology is to be raised to a new level in order to save time and resources and to speed up judicial decisions.

The draft law also provides for the possibility of setting up “virtual legal application offices” to communicate with citizens seeking justice via video conference. The draft bill also takes up proposals for amendments from the judiciary. The background: Video hearings and video evidence recordings enable faster and more cost-effective proceedings and thus make an important contribution to the modernization and digitalization of the justice system.

The draft provides for the following changes:

 

128a ZPO is to be revised

According to the draft law, the central standard for video hearings, Section 128a ZPO, will be revised. The court could then not only allow a video hearing to be held, but also order it. The parties to the proceedings would then have the opportunity to apply to be exempted from this order within a period to be determined.

If the parties agree that the oral hearing should be held as a video hearing, this should generally be ordered. If the court rejects an application for a video hearing, it would have to give reasons for this decision. The draft also provides for the possibility of fully virtual hearings in which the court is not present in the courtroom. The Federal Council has raised objections to this: According to it, the court should also be present in the courtroom during a video hearing in order to do justice to the special significance of the oral hearing.

In addition, according to the draft law, the taking of evidence, in particular the inspection of evidence, is to be possible via video conference.

 

Further changes for the court proceedings

The lump sum for expenses for the use of video conferencing technology in accordance with the Court Costs Acts is to be abolished under the draft law.

According to the Federal Ministry of Justice, the oral hearing, including the taking of evidence, may be recorded in audio and video in future, Section 160a ZPO-E. Previously, only audio recording was permitted. In certain proceedings, the parties should have the option of requesting audio or audiovisual documentation of witness statements.

 

Simplifications for citizens

Another planned innovation: According to the draft bill, it should be possible to submit applications and declarations for the minutes of the court registry via video to the court registry (Section 129a ZPO-E). This applies, for example, to applying for legal aid and filing a lawsuit with the local court.

The procedure for taking a statement of assets is to be extended so that it can be taken by video or at a location other than the offices of a bailiff or the debtor’s home (Section 802f ZPO-E).

 

Conclusion and outlook

The promotion of the use of video conferencing technology in the judiciary is to be welcomed. Conducting oral negotiations via video conferencing increases efficiency and contributes to cost savings, as travel costs and expenses are eliminated. In addition, video hearings make court hearings more accessible for people who have difficulty attending face-to-face hearings due to distance or physical limitations.

It remains to be seen how the bill will be revised by the mediation committee. Although the Federal Council supports the facilitation of video hearings, it would like to preserve the oral hearing in the courtroom as the heart of the court process. The countries reject purely virtual negotiations. When the law finally comes into force, it will become clear how quickly the new possibilities will be used in practice, and in particular how quickly the justice administrations of the Federal States will create the necessary technical requirements for video conferencing.

Explore #more

18.06.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest Article in *Innovative Administration*: Protection in Turbulent Times

Board members of municipal enterprises face personal, unlimited liability, which is further exacerbated by the unique characteristics of the public sector. D&O insurance protects their…

18.06.2026 | In the media

Handelsblatt and Best Lawyers Honor KPMG Law Experts

Best Lawyers has once again identified Germany’s top business lawyers for 2026, exclusively for the Handelsblatt. A total of 31 lawyers from KPMG Law and…

15.06.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Higher Fees for Designers Due to Cost Increases? What Clients Need to Know

More and more often, architects and engineers are sending additional invoices to their clients. “The project is dragging on, construction costs are rising, and

12.06.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

12th Amendment to the German Act Against Restraints of Competition: What’s Changing for Transactions, Public Procurement, and Certain Industries

The planned 12th amendment to the German Act Against Restraints of Competition (GWB) is expected to bring several significant changes for businesses, including higher thresholds…

09.06.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementation of the Pay Transparency Directive: what the expert commission recommends

The EU Pay Transparency Directive has been in force since June 2023 and should have been transposed into German…

02.06.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG is assisting hpm Henkel Projektmanagement with its integration into the BKW Engineering network

KPMG Law provided exclusive legal counsel to the shareholders of hpm Henkel Projektmanagement regarding the company’s integration into the BKW Engineering network. KPMG Law provided…

02.06.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law quote in Die Welt and Business Insider on the most important changes in June

In June, several changes come into force that will directly affect millions of consumers in Germany. From new rights for online shopping and changes to…

29.05.2026 | In the media

Statement by KPMG Law experts in the Süddeutsche Zeitung on the topic of embedded insurance

Insurance is increasingly being offered when buying cars, cell phones or concert tickets. Embedded insurance is particularly popular when buying electrical devices such as smartphones.…

26.05.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

The industrial electricity price – cost relief with new requirements and verification obligations

The industrial electricity price is in the starting blocks: With the publication of the funding guideline on May 6, 2026, the long-awaited legal framework for…

19.05.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

The amendment to the Environmental Appeals Act is intended to speed up infrastructure projects

The amendment to the Environmental Appeals Act (UmwRG) passed by the Federal Cabinet on January 21, 2026 is intended to speed up infrastructure projects.…

Contact

Dr. Matthias Aldejohann

Partner
Dresden site manager
Head of Litigation & ADR

Galeriestraße 2
01067 Dresden

Tel.: +49 351 21294411
maldejohann@kpmg-law.com

Miriam Golla

Senior Manager

Galeriestraße 2
01067 Dresden

Tel.: +49 351 21294412
miriamgolla@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll