Search
Contact
17.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

AI-supported risk checks of NDAs and CoCs: how legal departments benefit

Artificial intelligence can relieve legal departments of routine tasks such as checking non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) or codes of conduct (CoCs). These documents are part of daily business in many companies, but they harbor considerable risks if critical clauses are overlooked.

AI-supported tools can be used to systematize recurring audits, identify risks at an early stage and speed up decision-making processes. However, AI tools alone are not enough for success. Legal departments should bear a few points in mind when implementing them:

Automated inspections: More efficiency and safety

In principle, AI offers legal departments many advantages, because the manual review of NDAs and CoCs takes a lot of time and ties up highly qualified legal expertise in the wrong places. AI provides a remedy and directs legal expertise specifically to where it creates clear added value:

  • Significantly shorter processing times: Standard contracts or codes of conduct can be checked in just a few minutes. The AI identifies, evaluates and categorizes relevant clauses, allowing lawyers to focus on the final substantive review and more complex issues.
  • Standardized and comprehensible results: All audits are based on a centrally stored and documented set of rules. This ensures a high degree of comparability and traceability of the results, regardless of who carries out the audit.
  • Conservation of legal expertise: Recurring tasks are automated, meaning that valuable legal expertise is used specifically where it is really needed for case processing or strategic decisions.

Foundation of success: the company-specific set of rules

The actual benefit is not generated solely by the AI technology used, but in conjunction with the underlying company-specific set of rules.

  • The quality of the risk check for NDAs and CoCs depends largely on an internal audit guideline. This should be based on a systematic analysis of existing templates, guidelines and all relevant review criteria.
  • With the help of specially adapted AI bots, contracts are evaluated using these guidelines. In this way, the lawyers can immediately see where there are potential liability risks or impermissible provisions, which clauses need to be adjusted and to what extent a contract deviates from your company’s compliance standards.

Structured implementation process

To ensure the quality and acceptance of the new testing procedure, a clearly defined introduction process is crucial:

  • Practical testing: Legal departments should plan a pilot phase. This is where the process is tested and further developed based on employee feedback and, for example, the rules are refined. In this way, the suitability for actual work processes can be ensured.
  • Scaling and standardization: Once the pilot phase has been successfully completed, the standardized procedure can be transferred to other contract types (e.g. supplier or service contracts). This leads to a scalable and standardized procedure for checking different documents.

Competence development and acceptance in the team

AI takes the pressure off, but does not replace legal expertise. The team remains the decisive success factor. The introduction should therefore be accompanied by targeted skills development measures.

  • Strengthening digital skills: The introduction of AI tools should be accompanied by targeted training. Employees should be enabled to interpret the results competently, understand the underlying test method and apply the procedures independently.
  • Create transparency: The technology used, how it works, its potential and its limitations should be communicated openly. Transparency is the basis for acceptance within the team.
  • Strategic use of expertise: Legal departments should actually use automation to shift routine tasks. The legal expertise that is freed up can then be used more intensively to handle complex and strategic tasks.

AI tools are a quick win for the legal department

The review of NDAs and CoCs are prime examples of AI-supported document review, as they enable rapid success. You achieve clear added value through a more efficient, secure and future-oriented review with tangible benefits in terms of speed, transparency and quality.

However, clear governance in the form of internal guidelines, employee training and the strategic use of legal expertise are important. This not only relieves the burden on day-to-day business, but also strengthens the digital expertise of the entire team in the long term.

 

Explore #more

15.09.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Reporting Deadlines for Cyber Incidents Under the GDPR, BSIG, and CRA—Every Hour Counts

After a cyber incident, companies have only 24 or 72 hours to file their initial report with the authorities. A single incident can trigger multiple…

11.09.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

The Procurement Acceleration Act and Sustainable Procurement: What Is Permitted and What Is Required?

The Public Procurement Acceleration Act took effect on July 1, 2026. The Act implements the reform of public procurement law that has been under discussion…

08.09.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises the shareholders and management of KODIAK on the sale of shares and the strategic partnership with Bencis

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) advised the shareholders and management of KODIAK GmbH (KODIAK) on the sale of shares to Bencis and the establishment…

07.09.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law advises Bosch Rexroth on the sale of its Active Shuttle product business to Neura Robotics

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) has provided legal counsel to Bosch Rexroth AG (Bosch Rexroth) in the sale of its product business related to…

31.08.2026 | In the media

Op-Ed in the Börsen-Zeitung – Interim Assessment of the European Crypto Regulation MiCAR

A year and a half after MiCAR took effect, it is clear that, despite European guidelines, there are still misunderstandings regarding the requirements. KPMG Law…

19.08.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in HAUFE: Even If AI Makes a Mistake, the Board of Directors Is Still Liable

AI analyzes, makes recommendations, and helps make decisions. But who bears the consequences if it makes a mistake? KPMG Law experts Vincent Manthey and Sabrina

19.08.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Article in Bloomberg Tax: Germany’s Tax Crime Action Plan Pushes the Boundaries of the Constitution

The new 26-point action plan against tax and financial crime, issued by Germany’s finance and justice ministries, signals a shift toward tougher sanctions, closer interagency…

13.08.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Federal Ministry of Finance Presents Draft Bill on Mandatory Use of Electronic Cash Registers and Combating Tax Evasion

In July 2026, the Federal Ministry of Finance (BMF) and the Federal Ministry of Justice (BMJV) presented an action plan to combat tax and financial

11.08.2026 | In the media

Guest article in *Versicherungsmonitor* on the topic of cyber claims regulation

Cyberattacks—particularly ransomware campaigns—pose challenges for insurers when it comes to claims settlement. When entire IT infrastructures at insured companies come to a standstill and the…

11.08.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Transparency Requirements Under Article 50 of the AI Act: Companies Should Address These Questions Now

The transparency requirements of the EU AI Act have been in effect since August 2, 2026. These obligations apply to chatbots, AI assistants, avatars, synthetic…

Contact

Michael Roth

Senior Manager

Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

Tel.: +49 211 4155597-527
michaelroth1@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll