03.06.2019 | KPMG Law Insights

Subsequent declarations during an ongoing external audit – Important amendment to the AStBV

Subsequent declarations during an ongoing external audit – Important change to the AStBV

Tightening of the administrative instruction on the treatment of subsequent declarations during an ongoing external audit

I. Background
As soon as a taxpayer realizes before the expiry of the assessment period that a tax return submitted by him or on his behalf is incorrect, he must immediately notify the tax office and correct it (Section 153 (1) sentence 1 AO). This obligation exists irrespective of whether an external audit has already been ordered for the tax period in question or whether it has even already begun. A notification is only dispensable for the specific audit period insofar as the tax audit has already determined the error in question (AEAO to § 153 AO, No. 3 sentence 5). As part of preventive counseling, the aim is regularly to ensure that a mandatory correction report also fulfills the requirements of a self-disclosure that exempts from penalties or fines (Section 371 of the German Fiscal Code (AO)) as a precautionary measure (as a so-called self-disclosure correction). However, an exempting voluntary disclosure is no longer effectively possible for taxation periods and tax types for which an audit order has already been announced. A voluntary disclosure exempting from fines pursuant to Sec. 378 para. 3 AO is still permissible in these cases, however.

II. Previous situation of instructions of the tax authorities
The treatment of such notifications is mainly regulated within the tax authorities by the Application Decree on Section 153 of the German Fiscal Code (AO) and the Instructions for Criminal and Penalty Proceedings (Tax) (AStBV). Accordingly, voluntary disclosures (even if they are not designated as such but are at least recognizable) are and were always to be forwarded to the Office for Fines and Criminal Matters (BuStra) for examination. In addition, such declarations must also be forwarded to the BuStra where there are indications that taxes have previously been intentionally or recklessly evaded. There is no obligation to submit declarations to the BuStra if they are undoubtedly based on subsequent knowledge of the taxpayer (no. 132, para. 1 AStBV). De facto, this resulted in a very considerable scope of judgment for the assessment officer when dealing with notices of correction.

III. Change due to the AStBV 2019
Effective January 1, 2019, the current 2019 AStBV went into effect.
This massively restricts the tax offices’ scope for assessment when dealing with subsequent declarations. Specifically, the tax offices are now instructed to submit all subsequent declarations (regardless of their designation or material content) that are submitted in the course of an ongoing external audit to the BuStra for examination (No. 131 (1) sentence 2 AStBV ). In our opinion, it can be assumed that this instruction will be interpreted comprehensively by the assessment officials and that, in the case of ongoing external audits, subsequent declarations for periods not (yet) covered by this audit will also be submitted directly to the BuStra.

IV. Recommendation for action
The tightened audit procedures outlined above can prove extremely treacherous in correction and post-declaration cases. In the future, the BuStra will receive significantly more cases of supplementary declarations for review than before. This applies in particular to cases in which it is no longer possible to make an exempting voluntary disclosure due to the blocking effect caused by the external audit. It is obvious that this also increases the risk of prosecution. If the specialists in the form of the BuStra are always brought on board in correction cases on the part of the tax office, it is advisable from the company’s point of view to also involve specialized lawyers and tax consultants at an early stage, in particular also with regard to a defense under criminal tax law that may subsequently be necessary. Together with our tax experts at KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, we will be happy to assist you.

Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have on these topics.

Explore #more

13.06.2024 | Press releases

Handelsblatt and Best Lawyers honor KPMG Law Experts

Best Lawyers has once again identified the best commercial lawyers in Germany for 2024 exclusively for Handelsblatt. A total of 28 lawyers were honored by…

27.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Agreement on ecodesign regulation: products to become more sustainable

After lengthy negotiations, the Council and Parliament of the European Union reached a provisional agreement on the Ecodesign Regulation on the night of December 5,…

22.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

The AI Act is coming: EU wants to get a grip on AI risks

For many people, artificial intelligence (AI) is the great hope for business, healthcare and science. But there are also plenty of critics who fear the…

17.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: When the family business is to be sold

Around 38,000 family businesses are currently handed over each year. In most cases, the change of ownership takes place within the family. But more and…

03.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Doubts about inability to work? What employers can do

The certificate of incapacity for work (AU certificate) serves as proof of incapacity for work due to illness. However, only if the certificate meets certain…

27.03.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

EU Buildings Directive: life cycle greenhouse potential becomes relevant

On March 12, 2024, the EU Parliament approved the amendment to the EU Buildings Directive. The directive obliges member states and, indirectly, building owners and…

19.03.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, KPMG Law Insights

CSDDD: Provisional agreement on the EU Supply Chain Directive

The EU member states agreed on the CSDDD, the EU Supply Chain Directive, on March 15, 2024. Germany abstained from the vote. Negotiators from the…

21.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

The Digital Services Act – what does it mean for companies?

The Digital Services Act (DSA) is a key component of the EU’s digital strategy and came into force on November 16, 2022. As a regulation,…

15.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Data compliance management: How to implement it in practice

Part 3 of the article series “Professional tips for data compliance management”   The third part of this series of articles deals with data compliance

14.02.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, PR Publications

Guest article in ZURe: Monitoring the implementation of the LkSG

The current issue of ZURe (p. 20 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Law Partner Thomas Uhlig (Head of General Business and Commercial Law),…


Dr. Heiko Hoffmann

Munich Site Manager
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

tel: +49 89 59976061652

Arndt Rodatz

Head of Criminal Tax Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

tel: +49 40 360994 5081

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.