Search
Contact
27.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Cell Phone Inspections at US Border and Beyond: What to Expect

Key facts:

  • U.S. immigration officials may monitor public social media data and travelers should be prepared to share details about their personal social media accounts.
  • All travelers to the USA may be subject to a search of their electronic devices at the US border.
  • Travelers to the USA should pay attention to what they post, like and share on social media and messenger services, even before entering the USA.

The media are increasingly reporting on searches of travelers entering the USA. These not only concern luggage, but also cell phones and other electronic devices.

This is legally possible, even if there is no search warrant. This is because a so-called “border exception” applies to these searches, as the USA has a profound national security interest in protecting its borders that outweighs the privacy interest of an individual person.

Why are cell phones and social media searched?

Why are the immigration authorities targeting the cell phones and, in particular, the social media channels of those entering the country? Social media offers a comprehensive insight into the person.

Upon arrival in the U.S., all travelers must pass through Customs and Border Protection (CBP) passport control. Regardless of citizenship or visa type, CBP may identify travelers who they believe require additional inspection. Travelers may be selected for this additional secondary inspection randomly or for a specific purpose. The secondary inspection takes place in a separate room and can last from a few minutes to several hours. The officers may examine documents more closely, ask further questions about travel plans or examine the contents of cell phones, computers or cameras.

Non-US citizen travelers cannot object to these searches if they want to enter the USA. They must also grant access to their social media accounts and provide the officials with passwords if needed. Refusal may result in denial of entry to the US.

What are the authorities looking for?

In general, CBP looks for evidence that travelers are misrepresenting the purpose of their visit, engaging in criminal activity, or posing a threat to U.S. national security. Also content that disparage the U.S. government, its policy initiatives (foreign and domestic), or current geopolitical issues and events, might cause problems.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now also uses artificial intelligence to search cell phones in order to effortlessly search all publicly accessible social media data for topics of national interest. Such checks can also take place after travelers have crossed the border.

Social media best practices for those traveling to the US

Individuals traveling to the U.S. should review their privacy settings on their various social media accounts, including messengers such as WhatsApp and Signal, very carefully.

At all points in the U.S. immigration process – when applying for a visa, during passport control, or while in the U.S. – travelers must provide accurate information about their social media use when asked. False or incomplete information about social media use and usernames may be considered intentional misrepresentation of facts to secure an immigration benefit. This may result in deportation from the US, revocation of the visa or even a travel ban to the US.

To reduce the likelihood of CBP finding a reason to inspect the cell phone, travelers should carry a physical copy of all itineraries, lodging addresses, relevant tickets, brochures, etc. with them during their trip and present the paper documents upon request.

US immigration law does not provide for a right of entry for non-US citizens. The immigration authorities also have a great deal of discretion. They are required by the current US government to interpret the regulations strictly.

This article was amended on February 9, 2026.

 

Further article on the topic of posting employees to the USA and US immigration: Business Travel and Assignment in the USA: What you need to know about US immigration

 

Explore #more

01.04.2026 | In the media

Manager Magazin: KPMG Law in first place for legal advice

Every two years, Manager Magazin, together with the Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Management und Beratung (WGMB), awards Germany’s best auditors with a “Best-in-Class” seal and evaluates

27.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Special Infrastructure Fund and State Aid Law: Orientation for Funding Practice and Planning

The special fund “Infrastructure and Climate Neutrality” (SVIK) also entails considerable responsibility under state aid law for federal states, municipalities and recipients of funds. Anyone

23.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law, KPMG Law AT as well as KPMG in Germany and KPMG in Austria advise GOLDBECK GmbH on the acquisition of 50 percent of the shares in ZAUNERGROUP Holding GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and Buchberger Ettmayer Rechtsanwälte GmbH (KPMG Law AT) as well as KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG in Germany) and KPMG…

19.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI: how governing bodies are liable for decisions

If an AI provides the basis for business decisions, the people responsible are liable, not the machine. This makes the use of artificial intelligence risky…

16.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

KPIs in the legal department: How legal becomes strategically effective through control, transparency and data analysis

Today, legal departments are facing a strategic turning point: they must reliably hedge risks, but at the same time enable speed, control costs and make…

13.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial courts: when they are worthwhile for companies – and when they are not

Large commercial disputes are given courts specially tailored to their needs: the Commercial Courts. The German legislator introduced it with the Act to Strengthen the

10.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Krasemann Hausverwaltung to Buena

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the KRASEMANN family on the sale of KRASEMANN Immobilien- & Gebäudeservice GmbH (KIGS) and KRASEMANN…

09.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR and whitepaper obligations – what the transitional regulations mean

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) has been in force for just over a year. Among other things, MiCAR obliges issuers and providers of crypto…

09.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Private Banking Magazine: What tokenized banknotes mean in day-to-day treasury operations

The future of payment transactions will be shaped not by new currencies, but by new processing models. A practical report by Marc Pussar (KPMG Law),…

06.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in smartlegalmarket: Trends for legal departments in 2026 & 2027

KPMG Law has been surveying international legal departments on their challenges for more than ten years. The “Right to Progress” report is now regarded as…

Contact

Sabine Paul, LL.M. (University of Stellenbosch)

Partner

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.: +49 30 530199196
sabinepaul@kpmg-law.com

Sarah O’Neill

Manager

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.:
sarahoneill2@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll