Search
Contact
30.04.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Scope of the right to information under data protection law: Can the employee demand that his or her official e-mails be handed over? (BAG, April 27, 2021 – 2 AZR 342/20)

Scope of the right to information under data protection law: Can the employee demand that his or her official e-mails be handed over? (BAG, April 27, 2021 – 2 AZR 342/20)

Employers are now increasingly confronted with claims for information from (former) employees. However, it has not yet been clearly clarified what exactly can be the subject of the right to information and to what extent it must be complied with.

This presents employers with several major challenges:

  1. You must find all personal data of the data subject within a short period of time (one month) and, if necessary. prepare.
  2. You also only have a short period of time to check which information claims are justified and which are not.
  3. Last but not least, you may have to check in individual cases whether business secrets or the interests of third parties are affected by the disclosure.

In particular, the scope of the claim for surrender or transmission of a copy of the data has still not been decided by the highest court. The decisions of several state labor courts in recent years show that there are many open questions:

  • What rights to information exist with regard to data from whistleblower systems?
  • Can the information be refused with reference to reasons of secrecy? What does the employer have to present?
  • When may information be refused with reference to statutory exceptions?
  • Is there a claim to information about or surrender of data that must first be restored from backup files? When is the recovery effort unreasonable for the employer?

The German Federal Labor Court (“BAG”) has now, in its ruling of April 27, 2021 (only the court’s press release on the ruling is available so far), dismissed an action brought by an employee against his former employer for the transfer of a copy of data pursuant to Art. 15 para. 3 GDPR in the form of his e-mails sent in the course of his employment. The employee argued that his right to a data copy also included all of his work-related e-mails.

The BAG rejected the claim on the grounds that the claim was too vague. If the e-mails, a copy of which is to be provided, are not designated so precisely that it is undoubted in the enforcement proceedings to which e-mails the condemnation refers, the requirements for the definiteness of the claim are not fulfilled according to. The employee would therefore have to sue for information at the first stage in order to substantiate the request for surrender. The BAG apparently left open the question of whether the e-mails should be released at all.

The specific scope of the rights to information under data protection law thus remains unclear. Employers must therefore expect, not least because of the different legal opinions of the supervisory authorities, that in the end they would actually also have to hand over copies of all e-mails. Employers are therefore strongly advised to,

  • Maintain an effective data protection management system and a complete inventory of processing activities in order to be able to fulfill requests for information;
  • Do not ignore requests for information from (former) employees, as failure to comply alone can result in fines and claims for damages;

in case of doubt about the scope of the duty to provide information, seek legal advice promptly in order to be able to meet the one-month deadline.

Explore #more

14.11.2023 | Press releases

Tax and Law at a glance – New issue of the digital magazine “Talk

“Talk” stands for Tax and Law Compass, because that’s what the digital magazine wants to be: a navigation aid to the legal and tax aspects…

10.11.2023 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft advise Ziemann Holvrieka on the acquisition of Künzel Maschinenbau

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Ziemann Holvrieka GmbH from Ludwigsburg on the acquisition of the majority of shares…

09.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights

Mantelverordnung: New rules for mineral substitute building materials

On 01.08.2023, a number of laws came into force or were amended with the framework ordinance on the recycling of mineral waste: the ordinances…

08.11.2023 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises Wide Open Agriculture on the acquisition of assets of Prolupin GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) advised Wide Open Agriculture Limited (WOA) on the agreement to acquire the assets of Prolupin GmbH. The agreement provides…

08.11.2023 | Deal Notifications, Press releases

KPMG Law advises Wide Open Agriculture on the purchase of assets of Prolupin GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) has advised Wide Open Agriculture Limited (WOA) on the agreement to acquire assets of Prolupin GmbH. The agreement provides…

07.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

GWB amendment: These interventions threaten after sector inquiries

On April 5, 2023, the German government passed the 11th amendment to the Act against Restraints of Competition (GWB), the so-called Competition Enforcement Act.…

01.11.2023 |

Guest article in the “Versicherungswirtschaft” on autonomous driving

Autonomous cars are supposed to be the future. For the insurance industry, the development is accompanied by new risks, but also promising market prospects. In…

01.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights

The MoPeG is coming – Here’s how GbRs with real estate should act now

On January 1, 2024, the German Act on the Modernization of Partnership Law (MoPeG) will come into force. Then the civil law partnership (GbR) has…

31.10.2023 |

Philipp Glock on the use of generative AI in the current issue of Juve Rechtsmarkt

ChatGPT has ushered in a new information age. The same applies to law firms: If you want to keep up, you have to stay on…

25.10.2023 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: Company pension schemes in times of inflation

In times of inflation, both employers and beneficiaries worry about how the devaluation of money will affect company pension plans (bAV). Pension commitments are generally…

Contact

Sebastian Hoegl, LL.M. (Wellington)

Senior Manager
Lawyer
Specialist lawyer for IT law
LL.M. (Wellington)

Heinrich-von-Stephan-Straße 23
79100 Freiburg im Breisgau

tel: +49 761 769999-20
shoegl@kpmg-law.com

Sandra Zeis

Manager

Alfredstraße 277
45133 Essen

tel: +49 (0)201-1258449-110
szeis@kpmg-law.com

© 2023 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll