Reforms, reforms, and more reforms – no, this is not a summer trend, but a hard reality: Not only is public procurement law to be tackled, but public price law is also to be modernized.
If one gives the modernization effort and the envisaged measures a chance, one quickly notices some simplifications due to the new regulation. This applies both to the design of procurement procedures and to pricing, price calculation and determination in the course of drawing up procurement contracts. If these positive effects, which were intended and (partially) promised with the reforms, then also occur, this would probably be a blessing for every awarding authority or every procurement office.
For the friends of Union law among you, we have summarized the main findings recorded by the ECJ in its recently published decision on the application of the basic rules and general principles of the TFEU in public procurement. This concerns those contracts which – for example because of their low contract value – do not fall under EU procurement law, but in which there are cross-border interests. The ECJ draws clear boundaries for these contracts – in the underlying case a contract in the IT sector – which public contracting authorities must observe. Surely an exciting topic for you!
We wish you interesting reading!
Public Sector Team of KPMG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH
Mathias Oberndörfer Dr. Anke Empting
The basic rules and general principles of the TFEU must be observed in public contracts with a cross-border interest. Even if these contracts do not fall under EU procurement law because they do not exceed the threshold values. This is what the European Court of Justice recently ruled.
In its ruling of April 16, 2015, the ECJ found that public contracts – in this case the supply of computer systems and computer hardware – cannot be made bird’s-eye even if they are not covered by the EU Directive on the coordination of procedures for the award of public contracts.
Rather, according to the ECJ, the general principles of the TFEU, in particular equal treatment and non-discrimination as well as transparency, must be observed. This applies in any case if there is a clear cross-border interest in the public contracts in view of certain objective criteria.
Institutions of higher education and those research institutions that are classified as public contractors should be prepared to reform their pricing laws. The solutions proposed in the study commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy promise to simplify the application of price law.
On July 08, 2015, the Federal Cabinet adopted the draft law on the modernization of public procurement law. The draft bill is the first step in a two-stage legislative and regulatory process.
As already outlined in our Issue 21 from May 2015, the reform centers on the amendment of Part 4 of the Act against Restraints of Competition (GWB). The aim of the reform is to modernize the legal framework for public procurement.
One of these simplification measures is considered to be the Uniform European Self-Declaration (EEE), which in the future is to pre-structure the suitability test in the award of public contracts in the upper threshold range. It is planned that the EEE will provisionally replace the proof of suitability with a self-declaration in the award procedure. After a transition period, the EEE is to be available only in electronic form.
The EEE shall include, among other things, an assurance by the bidder that there are no grounds for exclusion, and that the bidder meets the requirements of the contracting authority regarding suitability as far as the bidder’s ability to exercise the profession, economic and financial capacity, and technical and professional capability are concerned. Further, the EEE shall include a statement by the bidder that it meets the contracting agency’s objective and nondiscriminatory criteria for reducing participants in the competition.
In order to simplify the procedure, it is also necessary to provide the possibility for the tenderer to submit at any time the evidence by means of which he/she wishes to demonstrate the fulfillment of the selection criteria. The contracting authority only has to request this evidence from the company that is to be awarded the contract before the contract is awarded. However, the contracting authority shall be free to request the evidence from all bidders at any time if this is necessary for the execution of the procedure. Contracting authorities must accept the EEE if it is submitted by the company.
However, the fate of the European Self-Declaration is not yet sealed and still requires coordination with the EU member states.
© 2023 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.
KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.