Search
Contact
02.04.2014 | KPMG Law Insights

Permissible weighting of award criteria for the evaluation of the most economically advantageous tender

Dear Readers,

Shortly before the European elections, our focus this time is once again on EU state aid and subsidy law.

Exciting times are coming for the research and development landscape: The EU Commission has issued a draft communication on state aid, especially for R&D&I projects. This draft is cause for celebration, as the Commission is now defining and concretizing numerous terms and funding instruments from the various EU funds in a cross-regulatory manner, thus creating greater legal certainty.

In addition, the ECJ has commented on the binding of national courts to opinions of the EU Commission and clarified that national courts are not bound by subsequently issued opinions of the Commission when implementing decisions of the EU Commission, but must take them into account in accordance with the principle of loyal cooperation.

We wish you an exciting read!

Your Public Sector Team at KPMG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH

Mathias Oberndörfer Dr. Anke Empting

It was not until the end of 2013 that the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court ruled that a 95 percent valuation of the price was inadmissible because it violated the principle of economic efficiency. In its decision of January 14, 2014, the Federal Procurement Chamber (VK Bund) has now ruled that the weighting of the award criteria “price” and “technical value” in a ratio of 90:10 is permissible under procurement law.

In the case to be decided by the VK Bund, the client invited tenders for construction services throughout Europe. The award criterion was the most economically advantageous bid. The evaluation matrix stipulated that the price should be included in the evaluation with 90 percent and the technical value with 10 percent.

In the course of the review proceedings, one of the applicants complained that the weighting of the price at 90 percent meant that only the lowest price was decisive for the award of the contract, while the criterion of “technical value” at 10 percent was in fact of no significance in the evaluation. In this regard, the applicant referred to the previously cited decision of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court of November 27, 2013.

Valuation of the price at 90 percent does not violate the principle of economic efficiency

The VK Bund rejected the request for review because it did not see any violation of the principle of economic efficiency. In its reasoning, the Procurement Chamber stated that the facts to be assessed by the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court at the end of 2013 differed significantly from the present case. While the “price” evaluation criterion had been given a weighting of 95 percent in the proceedings before the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court, the facts of the case to be assessed by the Procurement Chamber involved a weighting of only 90 percent for the price.

Scoring a criterion with 10 percent does not necessarily have an “alibi function

In addition – according to the Procurement Chamber – the criterion “technical value”, unlike in the case of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court, does not have a mere “token function”. This was because the bidders were required to provide information on the “construction process” and the “construction sequence” – each sub-criteria of the “technical value” criterion – which were evaluated using a differentiated points system and included as a basis for the evaluation. As a result, the points obtained under the “technical value” criterion can influence the ranking of the bidders, and a mere “token function” of this criterion in addition to the price is therefore excluded.

In addition, the Procurement Chamber stated that in individual cases it could also be objectively justified to give the price significantly greater importance than other criteria. If the services to be provided – as in the present case – were specified in great detail in the tender documents, there would be no room for the bidders’ “own creative” services in the course of preparing the bid. If the service is largely specified by the client, competition takes place primarily at the level of pricing, but not at the level of quality, which justifies a significant weighting of the price.

Explore #more

22.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

The AI Act is coming: EU wants to get a grip on AI risks

For many people, artificial intelligence (AI) is the great hope for business, healthcare and science. But there are also plenty of critics who fear the…

17.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: When the family business is to be sold

Around 38,000 family businesses are currently handed over each year. In most cases, the change of ownership takes place within the family. But more and…

03.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Doubts about inability to work? What employers can do

The certificate of incapacity for work (AU certificate) serves as proof of incapacity for work due to illness. However, only if the certificate meets certain…

29.04.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Agreement on ecodesign regulation: products to become more sustainable

After lengthy negotiations, the Council and Parliament of the European Union reached a provisional agreement on the Ecodesign Regulation on the night of December 5,…

27.03.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

EU Buildings Directive: life cycle greenhouse potential becomes relevant

On March 12, 2024, the EU Parliament approved the amendment to the EU Buildings Directive. The directive obliges member states and, indirectly, building owners and…

19.03.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, KPMG Law Insights

CSDDD: Provisional agreement on the EU Supply Chain Directive

The EU member states agreed on the CSDDD, the EU Supply Chain Directive, on March 15, 2024. Germany abstained from the vote. Negotiators from the…

21.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

The Digital Services Act – what does it mean for companies?

The Digital Services Act (DSA) is a key component of the EU’s digital strategy and came into force on November 16, 2022. As a regulation,…

15.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Data compliance management: How to implement it in practice

Part 3 of the article series “Professional tips for data compliance management”   The third part of this series of articles deals with data compliance

14.02.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, PR Publications

Guest article in ZURe: Monitoring the implementation of the LkSG

The current issue of ZURe (p. 20 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Law Partner Thomas Uhlig (Head of General Business and Commercial Law),…

09.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: The employment law function

In almost all German companies, the employment law function is located in the HR department and not in the legal department. One of the reasons…

Contact

Mathias Oberndörfer

Geschäftsführer
Mitglied des Vorstands Service Tax - KPMG AG Wirt­schafts­prüfungs­gesell­schaft

Theodor-Heuss-Straße 5
70174 Stuttgart

tel: +49 711 781923410
moberndoerfer@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll