Search
Contact
02.04.2014 | KPMG Law Insights

Permissible weighting of award criteria for the evaluation of the most economically advantageous tender

Dear Readers,

Shortly before the European elections, our focus this time is once again on EU state aid and subsidy law.

Exciting times are coming for the research and development landscape: The EU Commission has issued a draft communication on state aid, especially for R&D&I projects. This draft is cause for celebration, as the Commission is now defining and concretizing numerous terms and funding instruments from the various EU funds in a cross-regulatory manner, thus creating greater legal certainty.

In addition, the ECJ has commented on the binding of national courts to opinions of the EU Commission and clarified that national courts are not bound by subsequently issued opinions of the Commission when implementing decisions of the EU Commission, but must take them into account in accordance with the principle of loyal cooperation.

We wish you an exciting read!

Your Public Sector Team at KPMG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH

Mathias Oberndörfer Dr. Anke Empting

It was not until the end of 2013 that the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court ruled that a 95 percent valuation of the price was inadmissible because it violated the principle of economic efficiency. In its decision of January 14, 2014, the Federal Procurement Chamber (VK Bund) has now ruled that the weighting of the award criteria “price” and “technical value” in a ratio of 90:10 is permissible under procurement law.

In the case to be decided by the VK Bund, the client invited tenders for construction services throughout Europe. The award criterion was the most economically advantageous bid. The evaluation matrix stipulated that the price should be included in the evaluation with 90 percent and the technical value with 10 percent.

In the course of the review proceedings, one of the applicants complained that the weighting of the price at 90 percent meant that only the lowest price was decisive for the award of the contract, while the criterion of “technical value” at 10 percent was in fact of no significance in the evaluation. In this regard, the applicant referred to the previously cited decision of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court of November 27, 2013.

Valuation of the price at 90 percent does not violate the principle of economic efficiency

The VK Bund rejected the request for review because it did not see any violation of the principle of economic efficiency. In its reasoning, the Procurement Chamber stated that the facts to be assessed by the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court at the end of 2013 differed significantly from the present case. While the “price” evaluation criterion had been given a weighting of 95 percent in the proceedings before the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court, the facts of the case to be assessed by the Procurement Chamber involved a weighting of only 90 percent for the price.

Scoring a criterion with 10 percent does not necessarily have an “alibi function

In addition – according to the Procurement Chamber – the criterion “technical value”, unlike in the case of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court, does not have a mere “token function”. This was because the bidders were required to provide information on the “construction process” and the “construction sequence” – each sub-criteria of the “technical value” criterion – which were evaluated using a differentiated points system and included as a basis for the evaluation. As a result, the points obtained under the “technical value” criterion can influence the ranking of the bidders, and a mere “token function” of this criterion in addition to the price is therefore excluded.

In addition, the Procurement Chamber stated that in individual cases it could also be objectively justified to give the price significantly greater importance than other criteria. If the services to be provided – as in the present case – were specified in great detail in the tender documents, there would be no room for the bidders’ “own creative” services in the course of preparing the bid. If the service is largely specified by the client, competition takes place primarily at the level of pricing, but not at the level of quality, which justifies a significant weighting of the price.

Explore #more

09.01.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law strengthens Legal Transformation Managed Services and Legal Corporate Services with two new senior managers

On January 1, KPMG Law strengthened its Transformation Managed Services practice with Jana Sichelschmidt and its Corporate Services practice with Dr. Michaela Lenk. Both are…

06.01.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Käppler & Pausch GmbH

Gabriel Pausch, the co-founder and main shareholder of Käppler & Pausch GmbH, a system supplier for metal assemblies as well as metal and sheet metal…

03.01.2025 | In the media

Interview in Betrieb on the EU money laundering package and its impact

The EU anti-money laundering package harmonizes anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism rules in Europe and introduces new measures such as cash limits of €10,000, identification requirements…

02.01.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in eMagazin Immobilienanwälte: Creativity meets law in trademark protection

Four Frankfurt, Elbtower, Vonovia: real estate projects and companies are backed by constructs worth millions or even billions. In order to stand out from the…

20.12.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

The EU packaging regulation sets strict requirements for packaging

The EU has adopted the Packaging Regulation. After the European Parliament adopted the Commission’s draft on April 24, 2024, the EU member states also approved…

20.12.2024 | Deal Notifications

KPMG and KPMG Law supported the sale of circular Informationssysteme to the teccle group

Together with the corporate finance/M&A advisors of KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG), KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) advised the shareholders of circular Informationssysteme GmbH (circular)…

19.12.2024 | Press releases

KPMG Law defends Federal Motor Transport Authority against claim for damages in connection with the emissions scandal

The state is not liable to vehicle purchasers for damages. KPMG Law has defended the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) against a civil plaintiff’s state…

18.12.2024 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR – What the new EU regulation means for crypto service providers and issuers

An EU regulation will soon come into force that will regulate crypto assets uniformly throughout Europe. It contains significant new obligations for issuers and crypto…

16.12.2024 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises CERTANIA Holding GmbH on the acquisition of RASG Holdco Ltd.

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) has provided legal advice to CERTANIA Holding GmbH, a platform of the Munich-based PE firm Greenpeak Partners, on the…

04.12.2024 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advises Brain Biotech AG on license agreements and monetization of license rights

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Brain Biotech AG on the monetization of licensing rights with Royalty Pharma and the conclusion…

Contact

Mathias Oberndörfer

Geschäftsführer
Bereichsvorstand Öffentlicher Sektor KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Theodor-Heuss-Straße 5
70174 Stuttgart

Tel.: +49 711 781923410
moberndoerfer@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll