Search
Contact
19.04.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

OVG Lüneburg: No compensation for disadvantages due to examination anxiety in group examinations

OVG Lüneburg: No compensation for disadvantages due to examination anxiety in group examinations

In a nutshell:

A diagnosed test anxiety as well as a recurrent depressive disorder do not meet the requirements for the granting of a disadvantage compensation in terms of § 12 para. 5 PO. For this reason, the applicant is to be denied compensation for disadvantages, in the form of an individual examination instead of a group examination. Impairment can only justify withdrawal from the exam due to “inability to take the exam.” According to established case law, limitations of mental capacity due to permanent illnesses are generally not compensable.

Background:

The applicant, a medical student, seeks interim legal protection for the granting of compensation for disadvantages in accordance with Section 10, Para. 5 PO. Taking an oral group exam in the subject “Anatomy”, together with fellow students, was not possible due to her diagnosed test anxiety and was the trigger for various symptomatology. These include increased flight instincts, heart palpitations, and thought blocks and “black outs.” Under such conditions, he said, performance review is not possible. She applied to the respondent for the granting of a disadvantage compensation pursuant to Section 10 para. 5 PO for the group oral examination, submitting all medical certificates. The respondent refused to grant a disadvantage compensation, in the form of an individual examination. The applicant is appealing against this decision in the interlocutory proceedings. The administrative court rejected the request. The plaintiff has now filed an appeal against this decision.

Decision:

The OVG Lüneburg dismissed the applicant’s appeal. (Decision of July 29, 2020, Ref.: 2 ME 312/20)

The court states that the medical conditions presented by the applicant do not lead to a disadvantage compensation according to § 10 para. 5 PO entitle. The personal limitations presented are those that affect the performance per se. However, according to the meaning and purpose of the norm, the granting of compensation for a disadvantage due to a disability is precisely to ensure equality of opportunity (Art. 3 I GG) if, in the case of fundamental ability, only the possibility of representation has to be adapted to the ability. Here, however, the court assumes that the applicant’s medical conditions already impair her performance and that for this reason the provision for compensation for disadvantages cannot be used.

The certificate submitted by the applicant does not meet the requirements for the granting of compensation for a disadvantage. It only confirmed the clinical pictures, but not any physical or mental disability. The applicant’s previous successful group examinations also speak against such an assumption. It is not clear that the shape of the group exam makes it difficult to present/demonstrate their knowledge.

What can readers take away:

The granting of a disadvantage compensation serves to compensate the representation of the basically existing capability. However, it does not apply to compensation for reduced/restricted performance due to the disability. The personal issues that promote an inability to take an examination are not a disability and are therefore not subject to the disadvantage compensation entitlement within the meaning of § 12 para. 5 PO.

 

Explore #more

25.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement: The plans for supply chain law, EUDR and GTC law

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD agreed: “We will also abolish the National Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG).” At first glance,…

17.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the coalition agreement means for the financial sector

The coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and SPD also has an impact on the financial sector. Here is an overview. Increasing the energy supply The…

17.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

AWG amendment provides for tougher penalties for sanction violations

Due to the ongoing Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, the EU wants to make it easier to prosecute violations of EU sanctions. The corresponding…

16.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the new digitization plans in the coalition agreement mean

The coalition agreement shows how the future government wants to shape Germany’s digital future. What do the plans mean for companies in concrete terms? Here…

14.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

How the new coalition wants to accelerate investment in infrastructure

The coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and SPD marks a fundamental new beginning in German infrastructure policy. In view of a considerable investment backlog, the…

14.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025 and NKWS: Booster for environmental and planning law?

In the current coalition agreement, environmental and planning law is mentioned at various points throughout the coalition agreement, highlighting its great importance. However, the…

11.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What’s next for foreign trade? The plans in the 2025 coalition agreement

Foreign trade and foreign trade have become particularly explosive in view of the new US tariffs. The CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed on the following…

11.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025: What the plans mean for the economy

The CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed on a coalition agreement. The central theme is the renewal of the promise of the social market economy. The…

10.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025: Housing construction on the move

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed comprehensive reform plans in the area of housing construction. The aim is to speed…

10.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Energy in the 2025 coalition agreement: what the future government is planning

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD commit to the German and European climate targets and Germany’s climate neutrality by 2045. To this…

Contact

Julia Hornbostel

Senior Associate

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 3609945162
jhornbostel@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll