Suche
Contact
31.07.2020 | KPMG Law Insights

Data transfer following the ECJ ruling of July 16, 2020 C-311/18 (“Schrems II”).

On July 16, 2020, the ECJ issued a ruling in the Schrems II case that has far-reaching consequences for international data transfers:

  • The EU – U.S. Privacy Shield is ineffective and can no longer be used for data transfer to the U.S.. There is no grace period.
  • While the EU Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCC”) continue to be effective, the contracting parties must examine whether there are legal regulations in the recipient country that restrict compliance with the SCC and whether, if necessary, an adequate level of data protection can be ensured through supplementary regulations. The same applies to already approved Binding Corporate Rules (“BCR”).
  • The supervisory authorities have the right to prohibit data transfers also on the basis of the SCC, insofar as the regulations made with the SCC are not (or cannot be) complied with in individual cases.

The European Data Protection Board “EDPD/EDSA” announces in its FAQs, as of July 23, 2020, that it will provide guidance on the complementary measures for SCC. These could be legal, technical or organizational measures. For the USA, according to the ECJ’s findings, only measures that technically prevent access by the US authorities without a legality check in accordance with the principles of the GDPR or that give the data subjects the opportunity to seek effective legal protection in the USA should be considered.

Following the EDPD/EDSA, the following recommendation currently exists for dealing with data transfers to third countries:

  1. Data transfer to the U.S. on the basis of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield will not continue. Check whether the data transfer can be switched to another legal basis, e.g. the SCC, or whether there is an exceptional circumstance pursuant to Art. 49 GDPR.
  2. When transferring data to the U.S. and other third countries based on SCCs, data recipients in the third countries must check whether they can comply with SCCs in their country and inform the data exporters in the EU. The same is true for BCR. All data exporters in the EU should therefore immediately write to their data recipients in third countries and ask for appropriate information. No more information needs to be obtained for the USA, as the ECJ ruling already contains all the information.
  3. If the data recipient in the third country declares that it cannot comply with the SCC or does not provide information, both (data exporter and data importer) must check whether the security gap can be closed by supplementary legal, technical or organizational measures and agree on these measures in an amendment agreement to the concluded SCC.
  4. If the data recipient in the third country cannot comply with the SCC, the security gap cannot be closed by supplementary measures and Art. 49 GDPR does not apply, the data must be moved to the EU. If this is not possible, the responsible supervisory authority must be informed.

We are happy to support you, e.g. with the

  • Analysis of your service relationships with data recipients in third countries with regard to any need for adaptation
  • additions to the SCC required as a result
  • Analysis of the legal situation in third countries, as well as for
  • Responding to requests or orders from data protection authorities

We will provide you with further information on the implementation of the ECJ ruling “Schrems II” in third countries, in particular in the USA, in our 2 webinar series, in German together with the experts from KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft and in English together with our lawyer colleagues from Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP in the USA, as well as with our lawyer colleagues from other countries, planned for the end of August 2020.

Explore #more

27.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Agreement on ecodesign regulation: products to become more sustainable

After lengthy negotiations, the Council and Parliament of the European Union reached a provisional agreement on the Ecodesign Regulation on the night of December 5,…

22.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

The AI Act is coming: EU wants to get a grip on AI risks

For many people, artificial intelligence (AI) is the great hope for business, healthcare and science. But there are also plenty of critics who fear the…

17.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: When the family business is to be sold

Around 38,000 family businesses are currently handed over each year. In most cases, the change of ownership takes place within the family. But more and…

03.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Doubts about inability to work? What employers can do

The certificate of incapacity for work (AU certificate) serves as proof of incapacity for work due to illness. However, only if the certificate meets certain…

27.03.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

EU Buildings Directive: life cycle greenhouse potential becomes relevant

On March 12, 2024, the EU Parliament approved the amendment to the EU Buildings Directive. The directive obliges member states and, indirectly, building owners and…

19.03.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, KPMG Law Insights

CSDDD: Provisional agreement on the EU Supply Chain Directive

The EU member states agreed on the CSDDD, the EU Supply Chain Directive, on March 15, 2024. Germany abstained from the vote. Negotiators from the…

21.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

The Digital Services Act – what does it mean for companies?

The Digital Services Act (DSA) is a key component of the EU’s digital strategy and came into force on November 16, 2022. As a regulation,…

15.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Data compliance management: How to implement it in practice

Part 3 of the article series “Professional tips for data compliance management”   The third part of this series of articles deals with data compliance

14.02.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, PR Publications

Guest article in ZURe: Monitoring the implementation of the LkSG

The current issue of ZURe (p. 20 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Law Partner Thomas Uhlig (Head of General Business and Commercial Law),…

09.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: The employment law function

In almost all German companies, the employment law function is located in the HR department and not in the legal department. One of the reasons…

Contact

Dr. Konstantin von Busekist

Managing Partner
Head of Global Compliance Practice
KPMG Law EMA Leader

Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

tel: +49 211 4155597123
kvonbusekist@kpmg-law.com

Sebastian Hoegl, LL.M. (Wellington)

Senior Manager
Lawyer
Specialist lawyer for IT law
LL.M. (Wellington)

Heinrich-von-Stephan-Straße 23
79100 Freiburg im Breisgau

tel: +49 761 769999-20
shoegl@kpmg-law.com

Maik Ringel

Senior Manager

Münzgasse 2
04107 Leipzig

tel: +49 341 22572563
mringel@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll