Search
Contact
19.07.2019 | KPMG Law Insights

Company pension plan – double contribution

Double contribution (BVerfG, decision dated June 27, 2018, 1 BvR 100/15 and 1 BvR 249/15)

By Christine Hansen and Jean-Baptiste Abel

In two decisions, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that benefits from pension fund commitments that were continued by the employee with his or her own contributions after leaving the employment relationship are not subject to the obligation to pay contributions to the pensioners’ health insurance if the employee has become the policyholder of the continued contract. The Federal Constitutional Court has thus extended to pension fund commitments the legal situation that had existed since the ruling of September 28, 2010 (1 BvR 1660/08) for privately continued direct insurance policies.
The gKV-Spitzenverband has announced in a circular letter that it will accept repayments up to the statute of limitations on a fair basis, and has announced in another letter that it will also apply the BVerfG ruling to pension fund provisions. It remains to be seen how the requirement of being a policyholder, which is alien to the pension fund, is to be dealt with here.
It is still unclear whether there will be a further push to abolish the so-called double contribution system – the contribution of company pensions in individual cases in both the vesting and pension phases – by way of a major solution. In the Federal Government, the Bundestag and the Bundesrat, there have been attempts from various sides (for example, the introduction of an allowance instead of an exemption limit and a return to half the contribution rate), but ultimately the high expected costs are a major hurdle. Since the Federal Constitutional Court expressly has no reservations about the legality of double contribution, the debate is likely to drag on for some time.

Conclusion: The BVerfG has retained the requirement that the employee who has left the company must become an insurance policyholder in order to benefit from the more favorable situation under contribution law. Employers should therefore ensure that they swiftly enable departing employees who wish to continue the provision with their own contributions to enter into the policyholder position in order to avert possible liability for damages. For employers, the double contribution generally has no direct impact. However, the debate and reporting in consumer magazines are increasingly eroding the esteem in which company pensions are held by employees.

Explore #more

27.03.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

EU Buildings Directive: life cycle greenhouse potential becomes relevant

On March 12, 2024, the EU Parliament approved the amendment to the EU Buildings Directive. The directive obliges member states and, indirectly, building owners and…

19.03.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, KPMG Law Insights

CSDDD: Provisional agreement on the EU Supply Chain Directive

The EU member states agreed on the CSDDD, the EU Supply Chain Directive, on March 15, 2024. Germany abstained from the vote. Negotiators from the…

19.03.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

The AI Act is coming: EU wants to get a grip on AI risks

For many people, artificial intelligence (AI) is the great hope for business, healthcare and science. But there are also plenty of critics who fear the…

21.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

The Digital Services Act – what does it mean for companies?

The Digital Services Act (DSA) is a key component of the EU’s digital strategy and came into force on November 16, 2022. As a regulation,…

15.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Data compliance management: How to implement it in practice

Part 3 of the article series “Professional tips for data compliance management”   The third part of this series of articles deals with data compliance

14.02.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, PR Publications

Guest article in ZURe: Monitoring the implementation of the LkSG

The current issue of ZURe (p. 20 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Law Partner Thomas Uhlig (Head of General Business and Commercial Law),…

09.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: The employment law function

In almost all German companies, the employment law function is located in the HR department and not in the legal department. One of the reasons…

24.01.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

How the new unitary patent works – ten facts

The new unitary patent can be applied for at the European Patent Office (EPO) from June 1, 2023. The Implementing Regulations and the Schedule of

22.01.2024 | PR Publications

Guest article in the Börsen-Zeitung on the subject of EU antitrust regulations

Agreements with competitors on sustainability efforts may violate antitrust law. Which legal interest should then take precedence? KPMG Law expert Jonas Brueckner discusses this question…

18.01.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

AI and copyright – what is permitted when using LLMs?

A few months ago, new players entered the legal scene and have since caused numerous legal discussions: Large Language Models (LLM), better known as…

Contact

Christine Hansen

Senior Manager

Klingelhöferstraße 18
10785 Berlin

tel: +49 30 530199150
christinehansen@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll