Search
Contact
03.06.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Clever succession planning through successive business transfer

Clever succession planning through successive business transfer

Business does not need to be handed over in one fell swoop + Different models possible for gradual transition + Well thought-out design allays business owners’ concerns about transfer to the next generation

Dealing with age, passivity and death discourages many business owners from addressing the issue of succession planning in a timely manner. In addition, there is not infrequently the notion that a company handover must be “all or nothing”. However, German law offers a wealth of opportunities and great flexibility to gradually introduce successors to future tasks and the responsibilities that go with them. This can also be attractive from a tax perspective.

Here are some examples of succession design:

Maintain entrepreneurial influence

Depending on the wishes and possibilities, the entrepreneur can continue to exert influence during the gradual handover. In the case of succession within the family, this can be done, for example, by only partially transferring the assets, taking advantage of the gift tax allowances. Through a multiple voting right or an irrevocable proxy by the donated children, the donor still retains his strong position.

Further profit sharing possible

In many cases, entrepreneurs may wish to transfer shares to the next generation during their lifetime, but the profits are not yet to flow to the donees, or not in full. Here, for example, the donor can have usufruct granted on the company shares given away and thus receive the profits after the gift. Pension solutions are also conceivable, in which the donor receives a recurring monthly payment regardless of the company’s success.

Ripcord recovery right

German law offers the possibility of being able to pull the “ripcord” in the event of a transfer by agreeing a right of recovery. This has several advantages for the Schenker. In this way, the donees will take the agreements from the gift contract and their new role as shareholders seriously. Otherwise, there is a risk that they would have to return their shares in the company. In addition, the entrepreneur can relax when it comes to succession planning. Because if things turn out differently than hoped and agreed, he can correct his decision.

Conclusion: By wisely structuring the transfer of the business, the parties involved can ensure that the next generation is gradually involved. In this way, entrepreneurs can make provisions for the future without suddenly having to hand over all the reins.

Explore #more

14.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

BGH on customer installations: Decision orders application in line with the directive

In a ruling dated May 13, 2025, the BGH classified the supply infrastructure in the specific case of a residential complex in Zwickau as a…

13.05.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law expert in Spiegel article on energy policy

Dirk-Henning Meier, Senior Manager in the energy law department at KPMG Law, is quoted in a recent article on energy policy in Der Spiegel.…

13.05.2025 | Career, In the media

azur Karriere Magazin – All AI or what?

Artificial intelligence has long since arrived in law firms and legal departments. But dealing with it is a skill that needs to be learned. Many…

13.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Initial experience with the Single-Use Plastics Fund Act: what manufacturers should bear in mind

Beverage cups, foil and plastic cigarette filters litter streets, parks and sidewalks. The cleaning costs are borne by the local authorities. The Disposable Plastics Fund…

07.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Termination of fixed-term rental agreements in the case of pre-leasing

In the case of a pre-leasing, the tenancy only begins at a later date, usually the handover date. In such cases, the contracting parties usually…

06.05.2025 | In the media

Wirtschaftswoche honors KPMG Law

KPMG Law was named “TOP Law Firm 2025” in the field of M&A by WirtschaftsWoche. Ian Maywald, Partner at KPMG Law in Munich, was…

06.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Social insurance obligation for teachers – transitional rule creates clarity

Teachers and lecturers are often hired on a self-employed basis. This practice makes the German pension insurance fund sit up and take notice. It is…

02.05.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in FINANCE Magazine: How CFOs can save up to 80 percent in the legal department

The cost pressure in companies is increasing – also in legal departments. Two strategies have now become established to save 50 to 80 percent of…

30.04.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law study in the Neue Kämmerer: How does the special fund get into the municipalities?

A special fund of 500 billion euros is to finance investments in infrastructure over the next twelve years. Of this, 100 billion euros are earmarked…

29.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Anti-money laundering and transparency register – what will the new government change?

According to the coalition agreement, the future government wants to “resolutely combat” money laundering and financial crime. The coalition partners have announced that legal…

Contact

Lars-Alexander Meixner

Partner
Mannheim Site Manager

Glücksteinallee 63
68163 Mannheim

Tel.:
lmeixner@kpmg-law.com

Mark Uwe Pawlytta

Partner
Head of Succession and Foundation Law

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49 69 951195012
mpawlytta@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll