Search
Contact
17.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

AI-supported risk checks of NDAs and CoCs: how legal departments benefit

Artificial intelligence can relieve legal departments of routine tasks such as checking non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) or codes of conduct (CoCs). These documents are part of daily business in many companies, but they harbor considerable risks if critical clauses are overlooked.

AI-supported tools can be used to systematize recurring audits, identify risks at an early stage and speed up decision-making processes. However, AI tools alone are not enough for success. Legal departments should bear a few points in mind when implementing them:

Automated inspections: More efficiency and safety

In principle, AI offers legal departments many advantages, because the manual review of NDAs and CoCs takes a lot of time and ties up highly qualified legal expertise in the wrong places. AI provides a remedy and directs legal expertise specifically to where it creates clear added value:

  • Significantly shorter processing times: Standard contracts or codes of conduct can be checked in just a few minutes. The AI identifies, evaluates and categorizes relevant clauses, allowing lawyers to focus on the final substantive review and more complex issues.
  • Standardized and comprehensible results: All audits are based on a centrally stored and documented set of rules. This ensures a high degree of comparability and traceability of the results, regardless of who carries out the audit.
  • Conservation of legal expertise: Recurring tasks are automated, meaning that valuable legal expertise is used specifically where it is really needed for case processing or strategic decisions.

Foundation of success: the company-specific set of rules

The actual benefit is not generated solely by the AI technology used, but in conjunction with the underlying company-specific set of rules.

  • The quality of the risk check for NDAs and CoCs depends largely on an internal audit guideline. This should be based on a systematic analysis of existing templates, guidelines and all relevant review criteria.
  • With the help of specially adapted AI bots, contracts are evaluated using these guidelines. In this way, the lawyers can immediately see where there are potential liability risks or impermissible provisions, which clauses need to be adjusted and to what extent a contract deviates from your company’s compliance standards.

Structured implementation process

To ensure the quality and acceptance of the new testing procedure, a clearly defined introduction process is crucial:

  • Practical testing: Legal departments should plan a pilot phase. This is where the process is tested and further developed based on employee feedback and, for example, the rules are refined. In this way, the suitability for actual work processes can be ensured.
  • Scaling and standardization: Once the pilot phase has been successfully completed, the standardized procedure can be transferred to other contract types (e.g. supplier or service contracts). This leads to a scalable and standardized procedure for checking different documents.

Competence development and acceptance in the team

AI takes the pressure off, but does not replace legal expertise. The team remains the decisive success factor. The introduction should therefore be accompanied by targeted skills development measures.

  • Strengthening digital skills: The introduction of AI tools should be accompanied by targeted training. Employees should be enabled to interpret the results competently, understand the underlying test method and apply the procedures independently.
  • Create transparency: The technology used, how it works, its potential and its limitations should be communicated openly. Transparency is the basis for acceptance within the team.
  • Strategic use of expertise: Legal departments should actually use automation to shift routine tasks. The legal expertise that is freed up can then be used more intensively to handle complex and strategic tasks.

AI tools are a quick win for the legal department

The review of NDAs and CoCs are prime examples of AI-supported document review, as they enable rapid success. You achieve clear added value through a more efficient, secure and future-oriented review with tangible benefits in terms of speed, transparency and quality.

However, clear governance in the form of internal guidelines, employee training and the strategic use of legal expertise are important. This not only relieves the burden on day-to-day business, but also strengthens the digital expertise of the entire team in the long term.

 

Explore #more

16.12.2025 | In the media

Interview with KPMG Law experts: CSDDD after the omnibus: “Toothless tiger” or pragmatic solution?

The agreement on the Omnibus I package is causing discussion. Among other things, the thresholds for the EU Supply Chain Directive (CSDDD) have been significantly…

12.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Focus offshore: NRW buys extensive tax data on international tax havens

According to recent press reports from December 11, 2025, the state of North Rhine-Westphalia has purchased an extensive data set with tax-relevant information from international…

12.12.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises The Chemours Company on the implementation and closing of a large-volume factoring financing

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft GmbH (KPMG Law) advised the US-American Chemours Company on the implementation of a cross-border factoring financing. The legal implementation was managed by…

11.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

Negotiators from the EU Parliament and the Council have now reached an agreement on the outstanding points of the first omnibus package. The content of…

11.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

IPCEI-AI: Requirements for funding and evaluation criteria

On December 5, 2025, the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy launched the expression of interest procedure for the “IPCEI Artificial Intelligence” (IPCEI-AI) funding…

11.12.2025 | In the media

Interview in TextilWirtschaft – What the relaxed EU supply chain law means for the industry

After weeks of debate, the weakened form of the CSDDD has now been adopted in Brussels. This brings new, complex legal uncertainties for companies, says…

02.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementation of the Pay Transparency Directive: what the expert commission recommends

The EU Pay Transparency Directive has been in force since June 2023 and must now be transposed into German law. In the coalition agreement,…

28.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest article Expert forum on employment law: Between theory and practice: The EU Blue Card and the right to short-term mobility within the EU

Nowadays, not only employees but also employers want to create more attractive working conditions. For some time now, so-called workstations / work-from-anywhere programs or other…

26.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

EU deforestation regulation forces companies to act

Anyone who trades in or uses the raw materials soy, oil palm, cattle, coffee, cocoa, rubber and wood and certain products made from them should…

25.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Special infrastructure assets: how the administration manages to implement projects quickly

The special infrastructure fund creates the opportunity to catch up on years of investment backlog. There is a need for urgency. Defence capability, economic growth…

Contact

Michael Roth

Senior Manager

Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

Tel.: +49 211 4155597-527
michaelroth1@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll