Search
Contact
22.08.2018 | KPMG Law Insights

Foreign Trade Law & Export Control – [UPDATE] The US withdrawal from the JCPOA and the reactivation of the Blocking Statute by the EU – Implications for European Companies in Foreign Trade

The U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA and the reactivation of the Blocking Statute by the EU – Implications for European Companies in Foreign Trade

On May 8, 2018, U.S. President Donald J. Trump announced that he would end U.S. participation in the nuclear agreement reached with Iran – the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Following the U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal and the expiration of a wind-down period, the financial and economic sanctions imposed by the U.S. against Iran are to be gradually reinstated. Within the wind-down periods, which are 90 and 180 days and end on August 6, 2018 and November 4, 2018, respectively, companies should wind down and terminate existing business relationships in Iran.

After the first wind-down period expires on August 6, 2018, sanctions related to foreign exchange and commodity trading, as well as against Iran’s automotive industry, among others, will resume. Finally, after the expiration of the second wind-down period, i.e., on November 4, 2018, sanctions against the oil industry, the energy sector, and the financial and insurance industries will revive. The U.S., for example, is already pushing for a global import ban on Iranian oil and has announced it will not make exceptions for the European Union (EU).

Response by the EU

The U.S. withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal has drawn criticism. The EU, as well as the other signatories of the agreement, have explicitly expressed their support for the preservation of the nuclear agreement with Iran and want to maintain their economic relations in Iran.

To save the nuclear deal, the EU Commission has initiated the formal procedure to reactivate the so-called Blocking Statute (Regulation (EC) No. 2271/96). This anti-boycott provision aims to prevent the extraterritorial application of U.S. sanctions. The Blocking Statute thereby criminalizes participation in the Iran sanctions imposed by the U.S. on companies, but at the same time provides for the possibility of applying for exemptions.

The law is scheduled to take effect before August 6, 2018, the end of the first wind-down period.

Implications for exporting companies

However, European companies operating internationally are thus faced with the dilemma that compliance with the European anti-boycott regulation simultaneously leads to a violation of U.S. embargo provisions. This is compounded by the fact that failure to comply with U.S. sanctions can lead to serious consequences and drastic fines for companies. In addition, past experience has shown that the U.S. administration also consistently takes action against embargo violations by foreign companies.

The Blocking Statute, on the other hand, has not yet been applied in the past. The dispute at the time over sanctions against Cuba, Iran and Libya was settled. In this respect, it remains to be seen how the situation will develop and how the EU, in the event of a violation of the anti-boycott regulation, will react.

Update

Following the expiration of the first wind-down period, a large number of sanctions originally suspended by the JCPOA re-entered into force on August 7, 2018. The following activities, among others, are now sanctioned again:

  • The purchase or acquisition of U.S. banknotes by the Government of Iran.
  • Trading in gold or its precious metals
  • The sale, supply or transfer of graphite, metals such as aluminum or steel, coal and software to integrate industrial processes to and from Iran.
  • Significant transactions related to the purchase or sale of the Iranian currency Rial.
  • The purchase, subscription or facilitation of the issuance of Iranian government bonds.

Sanctions against the Iranian automotive sector have also been reimposed.

Furthermore, the U.S. has the authority to

  • the import of foodstuffs and carpets from Iran, and
  • revoke all activities related to the export or re-export of commercial passenger aircraft and related parts and services to Iran.

In connection with the sanctions, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has posted FAQs on sanctions and settlement deadlines, as well as FAQs on the Executive Order itself, on its website.

Entry into force of the EU Blocking Regulation

Simultaneously with the revival of U.S. sanctions, the EU’s updated Blocking Regulation – (EC) No. 2271/96 – also entered into force on August 7, 2018.

In order to support EU economic operators in the application of the Blocking Statute, the EU Commission has published a guide on this subject.

In addition, the Commission has provided a template to assist EU economic operators in preparing and submitting a request for exemption.

The Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) has also set up a “Contact Point Iran” for affected German companies. They can contact the BMWi directly at Kontaktstelle@bmwi.bund.de.

Current developments

In connection with the new sanctions against Iran, the carmaker Daimler, for example, has already announced that its “already limited activities have been suspended until further notice”. The carmakers Renault and Peugeot have also made corresponding announcements.

Explore #more

23.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law, KPMG Law AT as well as KPMG in Germany and KPMG in Austria advise GOLDBECK GmbH on the acquisition of 50 percent of the shares in ZAUNERGROUP Holding GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and Buchberger Ettmayer Rechtsanwälte GmbH (KPMG Law AT) as well as KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG in Germany) and KPMG…

19.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI: how governing bodies are liable for decisions

If an AI provides the basis for business decisions, the people responsible are liable, not the machine. This makes the use of artificial intelligence risky…

16.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

KPIs in the legal department: How legal becomes strategically effective through control, transparency and data analysis

Today, legal departments are facing a strategic turning point: they must reliably hedge risks, but at the same time enable speed, control costs and make…

13.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial courts: when they are worthwhile for companies – and when they are not

Large commercial disputes are given courts specially tailored to their needs: the Commercial Courts. The German legislator introduced it with the Act to Strengthen the

10.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Krasemann Hausverwaltung to Buena

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the KRASEMANN family on the sale of KRASEMANN Immobilien- & Gebäudeservice GmbH (KIGS) and KRASEMANN…

09.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR and whitepaper obligations – what the transitional regulations mean

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) has been in force for just over a year. Among other things, MiCAR obliges issuers and providers of crypto…

09.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Private Banking Magazine: What tokenized banknotes mean in day-to-day treasury operations

The future of payment transactions will be shaped not by new currencies, but by new processing models. A practical report by Marc Pussar (KPMG Law),…

06.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in smartlegalmarket: Trends for legal departments in 2026 & 2027

KPMG Law has been surveying international legal departments on their challenges for more than ten years. The “Right to Progress” report is now regarded as…

06.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Carve-out: The biggest risks and how the legal workstream avoids them

A carve-out does not usually fail due to a lack of ideas. And not due to a lack of buyers. Nor do they usually fail…

04.03.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law expert with statement in dpn magazine on the Location Promotion Act

Shortly after coming into force, the Location Promotion Act is apparently already having a noticeable effect on the investment plans of institutional market participants. In…

Contact

Dr. Konstantin von Busekist

Partner
Head of Global Compliance Practice
KPMG Law EMA Leader

Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

Tel.: +49 211 4155597123
kvonbusekist@kpmg-law.com

Anne-Kathrin Gillig

Partner
Regional Manager Central
Head of Compliance and Business Criminal Law

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49 69 951195013
agillig@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll