Search
Contact
05.10.2020 | KPMG Law Insights

Tax dispute – Update – Turkey participates in the automatic exchange of information to combat cross-border tax evasion.

Update – Turkey participates in the automatic exchange of information to combat cross-border tax evasion.

I. Background

On July 01, 2020, the Federal Ministry of Finance (BMF) published the “State Exchange List 2020” for the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts in tax matters (AEOI). This list, which has now grown to 100 countries, includes Turkey for the first time. This means that Turkish financial institutions (banks and insurance companies) are also required to report information on accounts, their holders, account balances and income such as interest, dividends and capital gains to the Turkish tax authorities. They then forward these reports to the German tax authorities. In return, Germany reports the same to Turkey. The respective tax authorities then check whether the foreign income has been declared for tax purposes. If this is not the case, there is a charge of tax evasion.

In principle, the exchange of information within the countries takes place at the September 30 of a subsequent year. For the year 2019, the notification would therefore take place on September 30, 2020. However, because of the COVID 19 pandemic, countries participating in the AIA agreed to extend to the December 31, 2020 agreed. This also applies to Turkey. Although the information to be reported from Turkey relates only to 2019. As a rule, however, this information already allows conclusions to be drawn about corresponding account balances and income from previous years. In case of doubt, the tax office may estimate income in previous years.

II. New developments

In August 2020, the Turkish Ministry of Finance has now published an “information manual” for AEOI on its website. It specifies which countries will be included by Turkey in the AEOI. The contracting parties Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria and France are explicitly excluded, which could not be included by Turkey in the information exchange calendar with Turkey for the calendar year 2020 (in which information is exchanged for the year 2019). At the same time, it is pointed out that the European Union monitors countries that do not automatically exchange information with all member states and discusses sanctions against them. It is thus currently unclear whether, when and how Turkey will transmit account information to the German tax authorities. Against this background, it seems questionable whether those affected can speculate that the AEOI with Turkey will not be implemented after all. In any case, it is clear that the tax authorities of the two countries have different expectations.

III. What can you do?

First, the following should be noted:

If the German tax authorities become aware that income from sources in Turkey has not been declared for tax purposes in Germany, or has been declared incorrectly, they will regularly assume that there has been deliberate tax evasion. Willful tax evasion can be punished by a fine or imprisonment for up to five years, and in serious cases from six months to ten years. Special attention should also be paid to the topic of gifts and inheritance.

Who tax

  1. If you give away or bequeath undeclared assets, you leave your children a difficult inheritance that is contaminated for tax purposes. Whoever accepts such an inheritance and perpetuates tax misconduct of the testator makes himself liable to prosecution. The borderline to a serious case of tax evasion is often quickly reached in these cases.
  2. The risk of discovery of tax evasion always exists. Even before the automatic exchange of information came into force, tax evasion was detected, investigated and punished.

The solution must therefore be: “Use the time!” Especially if the Automatic Exchange of Information is now not coming on December 31, 2020, but at a later date, the time remaining until then can be used to clarify and bring about the possibilities and formal requirements for a voluntary disclosure that exempts from punishment. If a voluntary disclosure is filed in time and effectively, one remains free of punishment. Previous experience with Switzerland, Austria and Liechtenstein has shown that it often takes considerable time to compile the necessary information and (bank) documents for an effective voluntary disclosure. A possible delay in the automatic exchange of information may therefore be an opportunity to file a voluntary disclosure in time to avoid prosecution. This is because a voluntary disclosure requires – among other things – that the tax offense has not yet been discovered. If you want to be on the safe side here, you should definitely file a voluntary disclosure before the exchange of information has taken place. After that, it may be too late to file a voluntary disclosure in order to avoid prosecution.

We have many years of experience with the disclosure of cross-border facts and are available to provide professional advice on voluntary disclosures that exempt from punishment.

We do not charge a fee for the non-binding initial consultation.

Feel free to contact us if you have any questions on this topic.

For english version please click here.

Türkçe versiyon için buraya tıklayınız

Explore #more

27.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Special Infrastructure Fund and State Aid Law: Orientation for Funding Practice and Planning

The special fund “Infrastructure and Climate Neutrality” (SVIK) also entails considerable responsibility under state aid law for federal states, municipalities and recipients of funds. Anyone

23.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law, KPMG Law AT as well as KPMG in Germany and KPMG in Austria advise GOLDBECK GmbH on the acquisition of 50 percent of the shares in ZAUNERGROUP Holding GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and Buchberger Ettmayer Rechtsanwälte GmbH (KPMG Law AT) as well as KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG in Germany) and KPMG…

19.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI: how governing bodies are liable for decisions

If an AI provides the basis for business decisions, the people responsible are liable, not the machine. This makes the use of artificial intelligence risky…

16.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

KPIs in the legal department: How legal becomes strategically effective through control, transparency and data analysis

Today, legal departments are facing a strategic turning point: they must reliably hedge risks, but at the same time enable speed, control costs and make…

13.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial courts: when they are worthwhile for companies – and when they are not

Large commercial disputes are given courts specially tailored to their needs: the Commercial Courts. The German legislator introduced it with the Act to Strengthen the

10.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Krasemann Hausverwaltung to Buena

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the KRASEMANN family on the sale of KRASEMANN Immobilien- & Gebäudeservice GmbH (KIGS) and KRASEMANN…

09.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR and whitepaper obligations – what the transitional regulations mean

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) has been in force for just over a year. Among other things, MiCAR obliges issuers and providers of crypto…

09.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Private Banking Magazine: What tokenized banknotes mean in day-to-day treasury operations

The future of payment transactions will be shaped not by new currencies, but by new processing models. A practical report by Marc Pussar (KPMG Law),…

06.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in smartlegalmarket: Trends for legal departments in 2026 & 2027

KPMG Law has been surveying international legal departments on their challenges for more than ten years. The “Right to Progress” report is now regarded as…

06.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Carve-out: The biggest risks and how the legal workstream avoids them

A carve-out does not usually fail due to a lack of ideas. And not due to a lack of buyers. Nor do they usually fail…

Contact

Esra Gyarmati

Senior Associate

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 5997606-1040
egyarmati@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Heiko Hoffmann

Partner
Munich Site Manager
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 59976061652
HHoffmann@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Jochen Maier

Senior Manager

Heinrich-von-Stephan-Straße 23
79100 Freiburg im Breisgau

Tel.: +49 761 76999910
jmaier@kpmg-law.com

Arndt Rodatz

Partner
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994 5081
arodatz@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll