Search
Contact
05.10.2020 | KPMG Law Insights

Tax dispute – Update – Turkey participates in the automatic exchange of information to combat cross-border tax evasion.

Update – Turkey participates in the automatic exchange of information to combat cross-border tax evasion.

I. Background

On July 01, 2020, the Federal Ministry of Finance (BMF) published the “State Exchange List 2020” for the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts in tax matters (AEOI). This list, which has now grown to 100 countries, includes Turkey for the first time. This means that Turkish financial institutions (banks and insurance companies) are also required to report information on accounts, their holders, account balances and income such as interest, dividends and capital gains to the Turkish tax authorities. They then forward these reports to the German tax authorities. In return, Germany reports the same to Turkey. The respective tax authorities then check whether the foreign income has been declared for tax purposes. If this is not the case, there is a charge of tax evasion.

In principle, the exchange of information within the countries takes place at the September 30 of a subsequent year. For the year 2019, the notification would therefore take place on September 30, 2020. However, because of the COVID 19 pandemic, countries participating in the AIA agreed to extend to the December 31, 2020 agreed. This also applies to Turkey. Although the information to be reported from Turkey relates only to 2019. As a rule, however, this information already allows conclusions to be drawn about corresponding account balances and income from previous years. In case of doubt, the tax office may estimate income in previous years.

II. New developments

In August 2020, the Turkish Ministry of Finance has now published an “information manual” for AEOI on its website. It specifies which countries will be included by Turkey in the AEOI. The contracting parties Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria and France are explicitly excluded, which could not be included by Turkey in the information exchange calendar with Turkey for the calendar year 2020 (in which information is exchanged for the year 2019). At the same time, it is pointed out that the European Union monitors countries that do not automatically exchange information with all member states and discusses sanctions against them. It is thus currently unclear whether, when and how Turkey will transmit account information to the German tax authorities. Against this background, it seems questionable whether those affected can speculate that the AEOI with Turkey will not be implemented after all. In any case, it is clear that the tax authorities of the two countries have different expectations.

III. What can you do?

First, the following should be noted:

If the German tax authorities become aware that income from sources in Turkey has not been declared for tax purposes in Germany, or has been declared incorrectly, they will regularly assume that there has been deliberate tax evasion. Willful tax evasion can be punished by a fine or imprisonment for up to five years, and in serious cases from six months to ten years. Special attention should also be paid to the topic of gifts and inheritance.

Who tax

  1. If you give away or bequeath undeclared assets, you leave your children a difficult inheritance that is contaminated for tax purposes. Whoever accepts such an inheritance and perpetuates tax misconduct of the testator makes himself liable to prosecution. The borderline to a serious case of tax evasion is often quickly reached in these cases.
  2. The risk of discovery of tax evasion always exists. Even before the automatic exchange of information came into force, tax evasion was detected, investigated and punished.

The solution must therefore be: “Use the time!” Especially if the Automatic Exchange of Information is now not coming on December 31, 2020, but at a later date, the time remaining until then can be used to clarify and bring about the possibilities and formal requirements for a voluntary disclosure that exempts from punishment. If a voluntary disclosure is filed in time and effectively, one remains free of punishment. Previous experience with Switzerland, Austria and Liechtenstein has shown that it often takes considerable time to compile the necessary information and (bank) documents for an effective voluntary disclosure. A possible delay in the automatic exchange of information may therefore be an opportunity to file a voluntary disclosure in time to avoid prosecution. This is because a voluntary disclosure requires – among other things – that the tax offense has not yet been discovered. If you want to be on the safe side here, you should definitely file a voluntary disclosure before the exchange of information has taken place. After that, it may be too late to file a voluntary disclosure in order to avoid prosecution.

We have many years of experience with the disclosure of cross-border facts and are available to provide professional advice on voluntary disclosures that exempt from punishment.

We do not charge a fee for the non-binding initial consultation.

Feel free to contact us if you have any questions on this topic.

For english version please click here.

Türkçe versiyon için buraya tıklayınız

Explore #more

29.10.2025 |

Fund Risk Limitation Act and Location Promotion Act create new scope for infrastructure funds

As the federal government’s special infrastructure fund of 500 billion euros will probably not be enough to finance Germany’s roads, networks and the energy transition,…

29.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises management board of Nürnberger Beteiligungs-AG on sale to Vienna Insurance Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the management board of Nürnberger Beteiligungs-AG throughout the entire public takeover process by Vienna Insurance Group…

29.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

BAG on pair comparison: How employers should deal with salary differences

The Federal Labor Court (BAG) has issued another landmark decision on equal pay. In its ruling of October 23, 2025 (Ref. 8 AZR 300/24),…

23.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the Federal Network Agency’s FAQs mean for storage system operators

On October 17, 2025, the Federal Network Agency published FAQs on the regulatory treatment of stationary battery storage systems (“BESS”). The FAQs are a guide…

23.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the “construction turbo” means for municipalities and building supervisory authorities

The Bundestag has passed the “construction turbo” and local authorities can now significantly accelerate certain construction projects. According to the law passed on October 9,…

22.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law guest article in Das Investment: Private debt for the masses: How the FRBG is turning the fund market upside down

Paradigm shift in the fund market: The new FRBG makes private debt retail-capable and creates citizen participation funds. In this article, KPMG Law expert Ulrich

20.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Data centers: Requirements for emergency power generators continue to rise

When the power fails in data centers, the consequences are often severe: Data loss and system failures can cause considerable financial damage to companies. Emergency…

16.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law contribution to the anthology “Crypto-Asset Compliance”

KPMG Law experts Ulrich Keunecke and Marc Pussar have contributed chapter 3 on capital market and banking supervisory law aspects of crypto-assets to the anthology…

14.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise Bühler Motor GmbH on the sale of Bühler Motor Aviation GmbH to Astronics Germany GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) have advised Bühler Motor GmbH on the sale of all shares in Bühler Motor Aviation…

10.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law guest article in NZG: Compliance due diligence in SMEs: Minimum scope and contractual mapping of compliance risks of the target company

In the context of M&A transactions, compliance usually still plays a subordinate role in legal due diligence. The purpose of this article is, on…

Contact

Esra Gyarmati

Senior Associate

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 5997606-1040
egyarmati@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Heiko Hoffmann

Partner
Munich Site Manager
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 59976061652
HHoffmann@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Jochen Maier

Senior Manager

Heinrich-von-Stephan-Straße 23
79100 Freiburg im Breisgau

Tel.: +49 761 76999910
jmaier@kpmg-law.com

Arndt Rodatz

Partner
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994 5081
arodatz@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll