Search
Contact
05.10.2020 | KPMG Law Insights

Tax dispute – Update – Turkey participates in the automatic exchange of information to combat cross-border tax evasion.

Update – Turkey participates in the automatic exchange of information to combat cross-border tax evasion.

I. Background

On July 01, 2020, the Federal Ministry of Finance (BMF) published the “State Exchange List 2020” for the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts in tax matters (AEOI). This list, which has now grown to 100 countries, includes Turkey for the first time. This means that Turkish financial institutions (banks and insurance companies) are also required to report information on accounts, their holders, account balances and income such as interest, dividends and capital gains to the Turkish tax authorities. They then forward these reports to the German tax authorities. In return, Germany reports the same to Turkey. The respective tax authorities then check whether the foreign income has been declared for tax purposes. If this is not the case, there is a charge of tax evasion.

In principle, the exchange of information within the countries takes place at the September 30 of a subsequent year. For the year 2019, the notification would therefore take place on September 30, 2020. However, because of the COVID 19 pandemic, countries participating in the AIA agreed to extend to the December 31, 2020 agreed. This also applies to Turkey. Although the information to be reported from Turkey relates only to 2019. As a rule, however, this information already allows conclusions to be drawn about corresponding account balances and income from previous years. In case of doubt, the tax office may estimate income in previous years.

II. New developments

In August 2020, the Turkish Ministry of Finance has now published an “information manual” for AEOI on its website. It specifies which countries will be included by Turkey in the AEOI. The contracting parties Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria and France are explicitly excluded, which could not be included by Turkey in the information exchange calendar with Turkey for the calendar year 2020 (in which information is exchanged for the year 2019). At the same time, it is pointed out that the European Union monitors countries that do not automatically exchange information with all member states and discusses sanctions against them. It is thus currently unclear whether, when and how Turkey will transmit account information to the German tax authorities. Against this background, it seems questionable whether those affected can speculate that the AEOI with Turkey will not be implemented after all. In any case, it is clear that the tax authorities of the two countries have different expectations.

III. What can you do?

First, the following should be noted:

If the German tax authorities become aware that income from sources in Turkey has not been declared for tax purposes in Germany, or has been declared incorrectly, they will regularly assume that there has been deliberate tax evasion. Willful tax evasion can be punished by a fine or imprisonment for up to five years, and in serious cases from six months to ten years. Special attention should also be paid to the topic of gifts and inheritance.

Who tax

  1. If you give away or bequeath undeclared assets, you leave your children a difficult inheritance that is contaminated for tax purposes. Whoever accepts such an inheritance and perpetuates tax misconduct of the testator makes himself liable to prosecution. The borderline to a serious case of tax evasion is often quickly reached in these cases.
  2. The risk of discovery of tax evasion always exists. Even before the automatic exchange of information came into force, tax evasion was detected, investigated and punished.

The solution must therefore be: “Use the time!” Especially if the Automatic Exchange of Information is now not coming on December 31, 2020, but at a later date, the time remaining until then can be used to clarify and bring about the possibilities and formal requirements for a voluntary disclosure that exempts from punishment. If a voluntary disclosure is filed in time and effectively, one remains free of punishment. Previous experience with Switzerland, Austria and Liechtenstein has shown that it often takes considerable time to compile the necessary information and (bank) documents for an effective voluntary disclosure. A possible delay in the automatic exchange of information may therefore be an opportunity to file a voluntary disclosure in time to avoid prosecution. This is because a voluntary disclosure requires – among other things – that the tax offense has not yet been discovered. If you want to be on the safe side here, you should definitely file a voluntary disclosure before the exchange of information has taken place. After that, it may be too late to file a voluntary disclosure in order to avoid prosecution.

We have many years of experience with the disclosure of cross-border facts and are available to provide professional advice on voluntary disclosures that exempt from punishment.

We do not charge a fee for the non-binding initial consultation.

Feel free to contact us if you have any questions on this topic.

For english version please click here.

Türkçe versiyon için buraya tıklayınız

Explore #more

19.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Digital Omnibus: More efficiency instead of deregulation

The EU Commission wants to streamline digital laws. On November 19, 2025, it presented its proposals for the “Digital Omnibus” (including a separate AI Omnibus).…

18.12.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise the shareholders of Frerk Aggregatebau on the sale to DEUTZ

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) provided comprehensive advice to the shareholders of Frerk Aggregatebau GmbH (Frerk) on the sale…

17.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

AI-supported risk checks of NDAs and CoCs: how legal departments benefit

Artificial intelligence can relieve legal departments of routine tasks such as checking non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) or codes of conduct (CoCs). These documents are part of…

16.12.2025 | In the media

Interview with KPMG Law experts: CSDDD after the omnibus: “Toothless tiger” or pragmatic solution?

The agreement on the Omnibus I package is causing discussion. Among other things, the thresholds for the EU Supply Chain Directive (CSDDD) have been significantly…

15.12.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law guest article in Tagesspiegel Background: What the digital omnibus means for companies today

The debate on the digital omnibus has only just begun. Companies should contribute their expertise to the ongoing process and strengthen their internal foundations –…

12.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Focus offshore: NRW buys extensive tax data on international tax havens

According to recent press reports from December 11, 2025, the state of North Rhine-Westphalia has purchased an extensive data set with tax-relevant information from international…

12.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Legal changes in 2026: New obligations and relief for companies

Rarely has the new year been as difficult for companies to plan as 2026. All the signs in the EU are currently pointing towards reducing…

12.12.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises The Chemours Company on the implementation and closing of a large-volume factoring financing

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft GmbH (KPMG Law) advised the US-American Chemours Company on the implementation of a cross-border factoring financing. The legal implementation was managed by…

11.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

Negotiators from the EU Parliament and the Council have now reached an agreement on the outstanding points of the first omnibus package. The content of…

11.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

IPCEI-AI: Requirements for funding and evaluation criteria

On December 5, 2025, the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy launched the expression of interest procedure for the “IPCEI Artificial Intelligence” (IPCEI-AI) funding…

Contact

Esra Gyarmati

Senior Associate

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 5997606-1040
egyarmati@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Heiko Hoffmann

Partner
Munich Site Manager
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 59976061652
HHoffmann@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Jochen Maier

Senior Manager

Heinrich-von-Stephan-Straße 23
79100 Freiburg im Breisgau

Tel.: +49 761 76999910
jmaier@kpmg-law.com

Arndt Rodatz

Partner
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994 5081
arodatz@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll