Search
Contact
29.01.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Criminal tax law – Tax evasion: extension of the statute of limitations for prosecution to 15 years

Tax evasion: extension of the statute of limitations for prosecution to 15 years

With the JStG 2020 passed by the Bundestag yesterday, the criminal statute of limitations for particularly serious tax evasion will be increased from 10 years to 15 years.

Background

As was the case with the extension of the statute of limitations for prosecution of particularly serious tax evasion from 5 to 10 years in 2008 in connection with the purchase of data carriers from Liechtenstein, the legislator again decided on a general extension of the statute of limitations on the occasion of the processing of specific cases of tax evasion in connection with Cum-Ex cases. The legislator justifies the extension of the statute of limitations with the difficulties of clarifying highly complex and often international cases of particularly serious evasion. In this respect, the current ten-year statute of limitations already deviates from general criminal law, which would provide for a statute of limitations of 5 years based on the level of punishment for tax evasion.

This is already the second tightening of the criminal statute of limitations this year. In the summer of 2020, the second Corona Tax Assistance Act already extended the absolute statute of limitations – i.e., independent of interruptions – for particularly serious tax evasion.

Which acts are concerned?

The fifteen-year statute of limitations applies to all named cases of particularly serious tax evasion (Section 370 (3) Nos. 1-6 AO). Practically, the most common case is the reduction of taxes “to a large extent”. According to the case law of the Federal Court of Justice, a large scale exists for any tax evasion exceeding EUR 50,000. Especially in the corporate sector, such amounts are quickly reached, e.g. in the case of (conditionally) intentional evasion of income tax, sales tax or wage tax.

The provision shall be applied retroactively to all acts not yet barred by the statute of limitations at the time of its enactment. Following negotiations in the Bundesrat, the law is expected to be promulgated before the end of December.

Impact on law enforcement

The extension of the statute of limitations initially means that cases of particularly serious tax evasion do not become time-barred until 15 years have elapsed since the act was completed. The absolute statute of limitations, i.e. the period when a crime becomes time-barred at the latest, irrespective of any interruptions, e.g. due to investigative measures, is even 37.5 years.

Effects on voluntary disclosure

The new statute of limitations must also be taken into account when dealing with past tax misconduct by means of a self-disclosure that exempts the taxpayer from prosecution. An effective voluntary disclosure requires information on all tax offenses of a tax type that are not subject to the statute of limitations, but at least on all tax offenses of a tax type within the last ten calendar years. This means that cases of particularly serious evasion must be disclosed on the basis of a fifteen-year statute of limitations, instead of the previous ten years. The effectiveness of voluntary disclosures already made is not likely to be affected by the amendment. In this respect, taxpayers may legitimately rely on the fact that legal peace has been established by a voluntary disclosure made in accordance with the law.

Effects on the limitation period for tax assessment

The extension of the statute of limitations for prosecution may also affect the statute of limitations for tax assessment. In the case of tax evasion, the tax assessment period does not expire until the prosecution of the tax offense has become time-barred (so-called suspension of expiration, Section 171 (7) AO). In the case of particularly serious tax evasion, the statute of limitations for tax assessment does not expire until 15 years after the act has been committed.

Explore #more

05.11.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Security Clearance Checks Under the SÜG—Practical Implementation and Common Mistakes

Before employees are granted access to sensitive information or perform security-sensitive tasks as part of an assignment, their reliability must be verified through a special…

04.11.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

EUDR: These obligations apply throughout the supply chain – as of 2026

After being postponed twice, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) is expected to take effect on December 30, 2026. Companies that handle certain products derived…

04.11.2026 | In the media

JUVE: Risks Associated with the Use of AI at the Highest Levels

AI can assist executive boards, supervisory boards, and managing directors in making decisions. However, unverified results can create liability risks. Fraport General Counsel Thomas Stoll…

30.10.2026 | In the media

New Podcast in the Packaging Journal: PWR in Practice—Who Is Liable, Who Pays, and What Are the Current Rules?

The core obligations of the PPWR have been in effect since August 12, 2026. In the Packaging People podcast, Dr. Simon Meyer of KPMG Law…

29.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG and KPMG Law Article in *Betriebs-Berater*: Pitfalls in Customs Law

In light of geopolitical changes, new trade barriers, and more rigorous audits, customs and foreign trade law are increasingly becoming a focus for companies. The…

27.10.2026 | In the media

Op-Ed in Versicherungsmonitor: The Environment Is Finally Becoming a Compliance Risk

With the implementation of the new EU Environmental Criminal Law Directive, the environment is becoming a core area of managerial liability. Managers face reputational damage,…

27.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Federal Court of Justice on the Summary Report: Tax-Exempt but Still a Criminal Offense

Can someone be punished for sales tax evasion even if the sales were subsequently deemed tax-exempt? Yes, says the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) in…

23.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

PHP2Shell may trigger legal obligations for companies

Two critical vulnerabilities in the PHP programming language are threatening web applications and digital products worldwide. The Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) has warned…

20.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest Column in it daily: The Business Judgment Rule and the Use of AI

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence presents corporate leadership with diverse and far-reaching decisions. These decisions concern not only the selection and deployment of appropriate…

19.10.2026 | In the media

New articles have been published in PERSONALFÜHRUNG

The current issue of PERSONALFÜHRUNG (10–11/2026) features two articles by female experts from KPMG and KPMG Law. In the article “Will AI Save the Day?…

Contact

Dr. Heiko Hoffmann

Partner
Munich site manager
Head of criminal tax law

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 59976061652
HHoffmann@kpmg-law.com

Arndt Rodatz

Partner
Head of criminal tax law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994 5081
arodatz@kpmg-law.com

Philipp Schiml

Partner
Location manager Düsseldorf

Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

Tel.: +49 211 4155597150
pschiml@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll