Search
Contact
Microfon with a purple background
16.03.2023 | KPMG Law Insights, Podcasts

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: Data protection after Schrems II – Companies under pressure to act

In 2013, a 25-year-old Austrian filed a lawsuit in an Irish court against a leading social media provider. The accusation was that the platform had forwarded his data to the parent company in the USA. The Irish court referred the case to the ECJ and the Austrian data protection activist named Maximilian Schrems got justice. The highest European court overturned the EU-US Privacy Shield and thus stopped the previous practice of transferring data to the USA. Data transfers to countries outside the EU are only permitted if a level of data protection comparable to the GDPR is guaranteed, the ECJ ruled. The EU Commission subsequently revised the standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to third countries. Companies had until December 27, 2022 to adapt their contracts to the new clauses.

 

The data protection authorities ask

Not all companies are aware that they are transferring data to third countries because they are not always aware of where their service providers are storing and processing the data. But right now, the authorities are approaching the companies and asking. Those who are not yet using the new formulations should therefore hurry.

Leonie Schönhagen, attorney and manager at KPMG Law, and Dr. Daniel Taraz, attorney and senior manager at KPMG Law, talk in the podcast about what to do now, when to expect fines and in which cases exceptions apply.

 

The core topics of the podcast are:

  • From minute 1:48: What is behind “Schrems II”?
  • From minute 3:33: Have the majority of companies already adopted the EU Commission’s new contract clauses and what were or are the challenges?
  • From minute 5:23: What are the consequences of missing the transposition deadline?
  • From minute 6:27: Why the authorities are asking questions now and what they want to know from companies.
  • From minute 8:00: What is behind the abbreviation TIA?
  • From minute 8:56: What can companies do if the data protection risks in a country are unmanageable?
  • From minute 9:28: What should companies do now that have missed the implementation deadline?
  • From minute 11:20: Not all third countries are created equal – countries with adequacy decision
  • From minute 12:29: What is the impact of the U.S. “Executive Order”?

All “KPMG Law on air” episodes can be found here.

Explore #more

19.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Digital Omnibus: More efficiency instead of deregulation

The EU Commission wants to streamline digital laws. On November 19, 2025, it presented its proposals for the “Digital Omnibus” (including a separate AI Omnibus).…

18.12.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise the shareholders of Frerk Aggregatebau on the sale to DEUTZ

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) provided comprehensive advice to the shareholders of Frerk Aggregatebau GmbH (Frerk) on the sale…

17.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

AI-supported risk checks of NDAs and CoCs: how legal departments benefit

Artificial intelligence can relieve legal departments of routine tasks such as checking non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) or codes of conduct (CoCs). These documents are part of…

16.12.2025 | In the media

Interview with KPMG Law experts: CSDDD after the omnibus: “Toothless tiger” or pragmatic solution?

The agreement on the Omnibus I package is causing discussion. Among other things, the thresholds for the EU Supply Chain Directive (CSDDD) have been significantly…

15.12.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law guest article in Tagesspiegel Background: What the digital omnibus means for companies today

The debate on the digital omnibus has only just begun. Companies should contribute their expertise to the ongoing process and strengthen their internal foundations –…

12.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Focus offshore: NRW buys extensive tax data on international tax havens

According to recent press reports from December 11, 2025, the state of North Rhine-Westphalia has purchased an extensive data set with tax-relevant information from international…

12.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Legal changes in 2026: New obligations and relief for companies

Rarely has the new year been as difficult for companies to plan as 2026. All the signs in the EU are currently pointing towards reducing…

12.12.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises The Chemours Company on the implementation and closing of a large-volume factoring financing

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft GmbH (KPMG Law) advised the US-American Chemours Company on the implementation of a cross-border factoring financing. The legal implementation was managed by…

11.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

Negotiators from the EU Parliament and the Council have now reached an agreement on the outstanding points of the first omnibus package. The content of…

11.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

IPCEI-AI: Requirements for funding and evaluation criteria

On December 5, 2025, the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy launched the expression of interest procedure for the “IPCEI Artificial Intelligence” (IPCEI-AI) funding…

Contact

Leonie Troost-Schoenhagen

Senior Manager

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +4969951195923
lschoenhagen@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Daniel Taraz

Senior Manager

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994-5483
danieltaraz@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll