25.04.2019 | KPMG Law Insights

VG Munich: Deficit in justification for selection decision

VG Munich: Deficit in justification for selection decision

Facts: An applicant for a W2 professorship at a Bavarian university was classified as “not eligible for listing” and his application was rejected. The applicant had not been convincing in his teaching samples, either professionally or pedagogically. The applicant initially lodged an unsuccessful appeal against the rejection notice and then filed a lawsuit. In his opinion, the selection decision was not sufficiently documented, referred only to the teaching samples and did not include the other application documents. In addition, the evaluation of his pedagogical aptitude was flawed. Pending a decision on the merits, the applicant requested that the university be prohibited from filling the advertised position by way of an interim injunction. The Administrative Court of Munich declared this application admissible as well as well-founded (VG München, decision dated 18.10.2018, ref.: M 5 E 18.1230).

Reasons for Decision: The applicant had substantiated both the need for interim relief (grounds for an order) and a sufficient prospect of success in the main proceedings (claim for an order) (Section 123 (1) of the Code of Administrative Procedure). The court stated that the filling of the advertised position with another applicant would be imminent unless it granted the application for interim relief. However, the applicant’s right to an application procedure can only be effectively secured as long as the position has not yet been filled, so that there is a reason for an order. It is true that the university has a right to freedom of research pursuant to the German Constitution. Art. 5 par. 3 GG, the Federal Constitutional Court has a special competence to assess the applicant’s academic qualifications, but the principles for competitor disputes under civil service law would apply here in the same way. If a selection decision proves to be based on an error of judgment, the unsuccessful applicant who does not have an obvious chance is entitled to a new decision on his or her application and the advertised position is not filled for the time being. In order to be able to review and understand the selection decision in this regard, both on the part of the unsuccessful applicant and the courts, a written record of the essential selection considerations is necessary. The merely general reference to the teaching samples in the minutes of the meeting of the Appeals Committee does not meet these requirements. The main reasons for the qualification as “not listable” remained unclear. At the very least, a keyword summary of the teaching samples and a statement of the selection criteria applied and weighted would be required. In the “application list with reasons for rejection”, too, there was only one general reason, which could even be read in the same wording in the case of another applicant. Whether this list could be regarded as documentation of the selection decision at all was in any case questionable due to the lack of indication of the date of issue and authors. In addition, there was no reference to the other application materials other than the teaching samples. At any rate, a rudimentary discussion of these should have taken place in the selection decision.

Significance for practice: The Administrative Court emphasizes the special assessment competence of universities based on Art. 5 para. 3 GG with regard to the applicants’ academic qualifications. However, this does not release the universities from comprehensible, individual documentation of the selection decision. Sufficient time and effort should therefore be devoted to this documentation as part of job filling procedures. Careful presentation of selection considerations can avoid litigation over staffing procedures and ensure effective staffing.

Explore #more

08.12.2023 | PR Publications

Payout can be risky

In the current issue of Personalwirtschaft from 30.11.2023, there is a guest article by Stefan Middendorf and Gracjan Modrzyk. Some companies are once again…

07.12.2023 | PR Publications

Institutional Money – It’s all in the mix

Institutional Money 04/2023 discusses the opportunities offered by the Neighborhood Fund. The fund is ideal for real estate investors, as it is not limited to

01.12.2023 | PR Publications

WiWo: Best of Legal Awards – Philipp Glock Leader of the Year

On Thursday evening, WirtschaftsWoche honored outstanding projects and minds from consulting firms and law firms in Düsseldorf and celebrated the second Best of Professional Night…

29.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights

Energy transition also opens up business opportunities

The energy industry’s complex, capital-intensive transformation process offers investors and banks a great deal of potential By Lars Christian Mahler and Marc Goldberg for Börsen-Zeitung,…

29.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights

Guest article in ZURe – AI and the legal department of tomorrow

The current issue of ZURe (p. 48 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Partner Sina Steidel-Küster (Regional Director Southwest, Head of Stuttgart office) and…

29.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

Key Facts about the new draft of the “Data Act

On February 23, 2022, the EU Commission presented the new draft of the so-called Data Act, the “Regulation on harmonized rules for fair access to…

21.11.2023 |

Guest article in ZURe on the implementation of CSRD reporting in SMEs

The current issue of ZURe (p. 34 ff.) contains a guest article by Lena Plato (Director Legal & Compliance, FLABEG Automotive Group GmbH), KPMG Law…

20.11.2023 | Press releases

Statement by KPMG Law experts in Handelsblatt on the topic of sustainability cooperation in antitrust law

In the Handelsblatt, KPMG Law expert Jonas Brueckner is quoted in detail on the subject of cooperation in terms of sustainability. Until this summer, there…

15.11.2023 |

Legal 500 – Country Comparative Guide Germany

Gerrit Rixen and Jonas Brueckner provide an overview of the relevant legal regulations in the area of Competition & Litigation in a practical guide on…

14.11.2023 | Press releases

Tax and Law at a glance – New issue of the digital magazine “Talk

“Talk” stands for Tax and Law Compass, because that’s what the digital magazine wants to be: a navigation aid to the legal and tax aspects…

© 2023 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.