Search
Contact
02.04.2014 | KPMG Law Insights

Negotiations between the EU and Switzerland on funding programs halted – training funding also for trimesters

Dear Readers,

Shortly before the European elections, our focus this time is once again on EU state aid and subsidy law.

Exciting times are coming for the research and development landscape: The EU Commission has issued a draft communication on state aid, especially for R&D&I projects. This draft is cause for celebration, as the Commission is now defining and concretizing numerous terms and funding instruments from the various EU funds in a cross-regulatory manner, thus creating greater legal certainty.

In addition, the ECJ has commented on the binding of national courts to opinions of the EU Commission and clarified that national courts are not bound by subsequently issued opinions of the Commission when implementing decisions of the EU Commission, but must take them into account in accordance with the principle of loyal cooperation.

We wish you an exciting read!

Your Public Sector Team at KPMG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH

Mathias Oberndörfer Dr. Anke Empting

The reason for the stop is Switzerland’s announcement that it does not want to grant the new EU member state Croatia freedom of movement. In the view of the EU Commission, freedom of movement – in this case of researchers and students – is an indispensable component of the funding programs for both Horizon 2020 and Erasmus +. Therefore, all upcoming rounds of negotiations on Swiss participation in the support programs would have to be postponed until the discussion on Croatia’s free movement of persons had been positively concluded and Switzerland had signed the corresponding protocols.

As a result, Switzerland may in the meantime lose out on substantial EU funding for the research and development sector and for student exchanges.

Higher education law: Education grants are also available for trimesters

In its decision of January 13, 2014, the Higher Administrative Court of Lower Saxony (Oberverwaltungsgericht Niedersachsen, OVG) ruled that the term “semester” contained in the German Federal Training Assistance Act (Bundesausbildungsförderungsgesetz, Bausbildungsförderungsgesetz) generally also includes trimesters if the training sections at a foreign university are not divided into semesters but into trimesters.

In the first-instance proceedings, the administrative court had obliged the responsible BaföG office to grant a student educational assistance in accordance with the Federal Education Assistance Act (Bundesausbildungsförderungsgesetz) for her stay abroad at James Cook University in Singapore in the statutory amount.

The Administrative Court based this decision on the fact that a student’s claim under the regulations of § 5 para. 2 No. 1 BAföG is given. According to this provision, educational assistance is provided for attendance at an educational institution located abroad if this is conducive to the education according to the level of education and – in the case of universities – at least part of the education can be credited to the prescribed or customary period of education. The training would also have to last at least six months or one semester. If it takes place within the framework of a cooperation agreed with the training institution visited, it must last at least twelve weeks.

“Semester” is not necessarily 6-month period

It is true that the training periods at James Cook University are divided into trimesters. However, this was not detrimental to the granting of education subsidies, especially since the university’s academic calendar provides for three semesters of study per calendar year. The student in question had spent one such term entirely at the university, thus pursuing a meaningful partial education.

The OVG of Lower Saxony has now ruled that this is correct. This is because the term “semester” contained in the Federal Training Assistance Act cannot generally be understood as a half-year of study comprising the period of six months. Otherwise, the legal provision that the training must last at least six months would be superfluous, because a six-month minimum training period would already be prescribed by the concept of semester, if a semester were always a six-month training period. Consequently, the term “semester” could also include a training period lasting less than six months.

Furthermore, the above interpretation of the term semester would also be in line with the aim of the Training Assistance Reform Act to make the minimum duration of training abroad more flexible and to expand the support abroad.

Meaningful partial training required

As a result, the term “semester” also includes a trimester, if at a foreign university the training sections are not divided into semesters, but into trimesters. There is no reasonable doubt that a meaningful partial training can also be pursued in a trimester, which is the decisive factor according to the legal materials.

Explore #more

25.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement: The plans for supply chain law, EUDR and GTC law

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD agreed: “We will also abolish the National Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG).” At first glance,…

17.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the coalition agreement means for the financial sector

The coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and SPD also has an impact on the financial sector. Here is an overview. Increasing the energy supply The…

17.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

AWG amendment provides for tougher penalties for sanction violations

Due to the ongoing Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, the EU wants to make it easier to prosecute violations of EU sanctions. The corresponding…

16.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the new digitization plans in the coalition agreement mean

The coalition agreement shows how the future government wants to shape Germany’s digital future. What do the plans mean for companies in concrete terms? Here…

14.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

How the new coalition wants to accelerate investment in infrastructure

The coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and SPD marks a fundamental new beginning in German infrastructure policy. In view of a considerable investment backlog, the…

14.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025 and NKWS: Booster for environmental and planning law?

In the current coalition agreement, environmental and planning law is mentioned at various points throughout the coalition agreement, highlighting its great importance. However, the…

11.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What’s next for foreign trade? The plans in the 2025 coalition agreement

Foreign trade and foreign trade have become particularly explosive in view of the new US tariffs. The CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed on the following…

11.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025: What the plans mean for the economy

The CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed on a coalition agreement. The central theme is the renewal of the promise of the social market economy. The…

10.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025: Housing construction on the move

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed comprehensive reform plans in the area of housing construction. The aim is to speed…

10.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Energy in the 2025 coalition agreement: what the future government is planning

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD commit to the German and European climate targets and Germany’s climate neutrality by 2045. To this…

Contact

Mathias Oberndörfer

Geschäftsführer
Bereichsvorstand Öffentlicher Sektor KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Theodor-Heuss-Straße 5
70174 Stuttgart

Tel.: +49 711 781923410
moberndoerfer@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll