21.04.2022 | Press releases

KPMG Law advises Sparkasse Dresden on interest backpayments for premium savings contracts

The Dresden Higher Regional Court partially allowed the appeal of Ostsächsische Sparkasse Dresden in the matter of interest backpayments on premium savings contracts. The OLG’s rejection of the plaintiff’s method of calculating the rate of change significantly reduces the back payments.

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) is representing the Sparkasse together with the law firm Thümmel, Schütze & Partner in this and a number of similar proceedings. The subject matter of the lawsuit decided by the Dresden Higher Regional Court by judgment of April 13, 2022 in II. Instanz entschiedenen Rechtsstreit, Az. 5 U 1973/20, was the “S premium savings flexible” savings model. The contract concluded with a saver in 1994 provided for a variable interest rate on the savings deposit and, from the third year of savings, a fixed and graduated interest-bearing premium. During the term of the contract, the savings bank successively reduced the variable interest rate. The interest rate reductions, which in his opinion were unjustified, prompted the saver to take legal action after the end of the contract to demand additional interest payments.

With regard to the variable interest rate, the Savings Bank had a right to change the interest rate, which was exercised by means of a notice in the cashier’s office. This provision did not stand up to the court’s review of the content of the General Terms and Conditions. As non-transparent for the customer, the clause on interest rate changes was invalid. This left a gap in the savings contract. It was the task of the court to find a standard for the change of the variable interest rate by way of supplementary interpretation of the contract which corresponds to the concept of the concluded savings contract and is in line with the interests of the customer.

The saver requested the calculation of the monthly change in interest rates based on the moving average of the last ten years of the current yields of domestic bearer bonds/mortgage bonds with an average remaining term of ten years. The OLG rejected this interest rate series of the interest rate statistics of the Deutsche Bundesbank as a reference interest rate. Instead, the 5th Senate, which is responsible for banking law, decided that the interest rate must be based on the monthly actual interest rates published by the Deutsche Bundesbank for listed German government securities with a remaining term of 8 to 15 years.

According to the court, these interest rates reflect the long-term nature of the savings contracts, level out outlier effects, come closest to the typified savings period of 15 years, and still leave room for liquidity aspects. Due to their high liquidity without significant implicit and explicit costs, they represented the so-called “risk-free interest rate”, which took into account the guarantor liability applicable at the time of contract conclusion. In contrast, bond interest rates for mortgage Pfandbriefe contained a risk premium despite the collateralization, which seemed inappropriate as a reference, since the savings bank owed a fixed premium in addition to the variable interest rate.

A fundamental argument against the use of moving averages of reference interest rates is that the use of such past interest rates would be tantamount to a representation of the variable interest rate in a fixed-interest position. However, the savings contract promised a fixed interest rate in the form of a premium and, in addition, a flexible variable interest rate adjusted to the changing market situation.

According to the court, the relative difference between the initial interest rate and the reference interest rate must also be taken into account when calculating the actual interest rate.

This ruling means that there are good prospects of defending against excessive claims and finding out-of-court solutions between the savings bank and customers with similar old savings contracts that are in line with their interests.


Consultant Ostsächsische Sparkasse Dresden:

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH: Dr. Matthias Aldejohann (Partner, Lead), Philipp Glock (Partner), Miriam Golla (Manager), Markus Zawalich (Senior Associate, all Legal Corporate Services)

Explore #more

21.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

The Digital Services Act – what does it mean for companies?

The Digital Services Act (DSA) is a key component of the EU’s digital strategy and came into force on November 16, 2022. As a regulation,…

15.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Data compliance management: How to implement it in practice

Part 3 of the article series “Professional tips for data compliance management”   The third part of this series of articles deals with data compliance

14.02.2024 | PR Publications

Guest article in ZURe: Monitoring the implementation of the LkSG

The current issue of ZURe (p. 20 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Law Partner Thomas Uhlig (Head of General Business and Commercial Law),…

14.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

The AI Act is coming: EU wants to get a grip on AI risks

For many people, artificial intelligence (AI) is the great hope for business, healthcare and science. But there are also plenty of critics who fear the…

09.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: The employment law function

In almost all German companies, the employment law function is located in the HR department and not in the legal department. One of the reasons…

02.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

CSDDD: Provisional agreement on the EU Supply Chain Directive

On December 14, 2023, the Council and the European Parliament reached a provisional political agreement on the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). This…

01.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: Fair play in eSports

eSports is a billion-dollar market that is growing rapidly. This makes it all the more important for the economic players involved to comply with applicable…

24.01.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

How the new unitary patent works – ten facts

The new unitary patent can be applied for at the European Patent Office (EPO) from June 1, 2023. The Implementing Regulations and the Schedule of

22.01.2024 | PR Publications

Guest article in the Börsen-Zeitung on the subject of EU antitrust regulations

Agreements with competitors on sustainability efforts may violate antitrust law. Which legal interest should then take precedence? KPMG Law expert Jonas Brueckner discusses this question…

18.01.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

AI and copyright – what is permitted when using LLMs?

A few months ago, new players entered the legal scene and have since caused numerous legal discussions: Large Language Models (LLM), better known as…


Claudia Endter

Marketing Manager

Klingelhöferstraße 18
10785 Berlin

tel: +49 30 2068 1271

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.