Search
Contact
04.08.2023 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

Karlsruhe Regional Court: Forest protection does not make products climate-neutral

CO₂ compensation is not synonymous with the terms “climate neutral” or “environmentally neutral”. A lawsuit filed by Deutsche Umwelthilfe led to a ban on the use of the “climate neutral” and “environmentally neutral” labels.

The Regional Court (LG) of Karlsruhe (Az. 13 O 46/22 KfH) has ruled that a drugstore chain may no longer advertise its own-brand products with labels such as “climate neutral” or “environmentally neutral.” The court justified its ruling in a test case brought by Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) by saying that expectations were being raised that the products concerned did not fulfill.

Karlsruhe Regional Court: Forest protection does not lead to climate neutrality

In addition to the allegation of injunctive relief, active misleading conduct pursuant to Section 5 (1) and (2) UWG was also at issue. The court based its decision on the grounds that the promise of a climate-neutral product had not been kept. A specialized service provider had certified the products as climate neutral because payments had been made to tree protection projects. This became the drugstore chain’s undoing. It had intended to compensate for the greenhouse gases generated in the production of the products concerned by contributing financial aid to projects that support climate protection, such as forest conservation. Projects of this kind are essential instruments for climate protection, but: “The claim of climate neutrality of the product goes […] in principle beyond what can be achieved by means of CO₂ certificates from forest protection,” ruled the district court.

CO₂ lingers in the atmosphere significantly longer than such forest protection projects last

According to the Federal Environment Agency, the decomposition of greenhouse gases takes several hundred thousand years. The specific forest protection project is only planned until 2040, he said. According to the district court, consumers who are “normally informed, reasonable, attentive and interested in environmental protection” are misled by the label “climate neutral” or “environmentally neutral.” The labels suggested not merely a delay in climate pollution, but a final, permanent offset. In addition, the label lacked a reference to an Internet site that would have provided clarity to the average consumer.

Fruit gum manufacturer allowed to advertise with “climate neutrality

The Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court (OLG) had to decide a similar case. However, this one took a different outcome. In Düsseldorf, a fruit gum manufacturer and the Central Office for Combating Unfair Competition (Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs) disputed whether consumers would conclude from the claim “climate neutral” that on balance no CO₂ is emitted during production manufacture. According to the OLG judges, the average consumer can understand the term “climate neutral” in the sense of a balanced balance of the company’s CO₂ emissions, knowing that neutrality can be achieved both through avoidance and through compensation measures.

Contradiction of the courts?

The case of the fruit gum manufacturer was based on different facts. The advertisement placed in fact contained a reference to the website of the certifying company. To the newspaper reader, respectively. According to the OLG judges, it is reasonable to expect the newspaper reader to visit a website that is readily available for more detailed information. In addition, the OLG Düsseldorf did not have to decide whether sufficient compensation was actually provided by the fruit gum manufacturer and whether consumers were thus misled, since the Wettbewerbszentrale failed to submit a substantiated argument. This ultimately led to the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf rejecting the objection.

The decision of the Karlsruhe Regional Court is therefore not in conflict with the case law of the Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court. There was no deviation in the relevant consumer circle or in the established case law of § 5a UWG.

Outlook and liability avoidance in practice

Deutsche Umwelthilfe sees the ruling as a “milestone for consumer protection.” Legislators have a duty to set clear guidelines to avoid greenwashing, he said. More than 20 other companies were sued by DUH for using the “climate neutrality” label.

Even though the ruling is not yet legally binding, companies should scrutinize their environmental claims. Because there are other reasons that speak against “Green Claims”:

On March 23, 2023, the EU Commission presented a proposal for a directive on environmental claims (“Green Claims”). The directive contains far-reaching obligations for companies that advertise their products using environmental claims. New minimum standards are introduced for environmental claims about products or services. The goal, he said, is to create common criteria against greenwashing and misleading environmental claims.

The liability risk of companies is intensifying immensely as a result of the transformation of business life towards sustainability. Given the extensive obligations, caution should be exercised when companies advertise ESG-related efforts. In addition to general claims for damages, greenwashing also threatens violations of unfair competition. Companies should identify the relevant ESG obligations for themselves and establish measures and processes at an early stage to avoid violations and thus minimize liability risks due to greenwashing from the outset.

 

Explore #more

06.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the Green Claims Directive means for companies – an overview

With the Green Claims Directive, the EU will introduce extensive regulations on the requirements for permissible environmental claims. The aim is to prevent greenwashing so…

03.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG support the restructuring of Groupe CAT in Germany

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Groupe CAT on comprehensive restructuring measures with a cross-service team. Over a period of…

02.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises Epitype GmbH and MDG Molecular Diagnostics Group GmbH on the acquisition of significant assets of oncgnostics GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided comprehensive legal advice to Epitype GmbH, a company of the Dresden-based MDG Group, on the formation and subsequent…

02.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in ZEIT for entrepreneurs: We’ll take the 500 billion!

German construction companies are asking themselves: how quickly will the money come from the government? And they are worried that only the giants will benefit.…

01.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Federal Network Agency reforms special network charges for industry and commerce

The Federal Network Agency is planning a fundamental reform of the special network charges for energy-intensive companies. Any change to the current privilege regime entails…

30.09.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law dominates the top 100 list of the new law firm monitor with eight lawyers

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) occupies an outstanding sixth place in the overall evaluation of the TOP 100 law firms in the current diruj…

29.09.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

MiSpeL draft: New funding for energy storage systems and charging points

On September 18, 2025, the Federal Network Agency published a draft for the “Market integration of storage systems and charging points” (MiSpeL for short). For…

29.09.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Organizing the transformation and spin-off of corporate real estate with legal certainty

When real estate portfolios are to be transformed or spun off, the economic success depends heavily on the legal preparation. Complex legal issues often arise,…

25.09.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

MaGo update – roadmap for implementing the new requirements

On 14 July 2025, BaFin revised the circular “Minimum requirements for the business organization of insurance companies under Solvency II” (MaGo for SII-VU) and published…

25.09.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Foundation register – launch to be postponed from 2026 to 2028

The reform of foundation law, which came into force in July 2023, created a nationwide foundation register based on the commercial register. This was actually

Contact

Isabelle Knoche

Senior Manager

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: 069 951195200
iknoche@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll