Search
Contact
12.06.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

From AI tool to AI framework – a workshop report

It started with a few questions about Microsoft Copilot – and ended with a company-wide AI framework. We were able to provide the company, a global consulting firm, with legal and strategic support along the way. The example shows why well thought-out AI governance requires far more than just investing in licenses.

The trigger: “We are introducing MS Copilot – can you help us?”

It all began with a phone call that we often encounter in practice. Driven by the promise of generative AI, a leading international consulting firm had decided relatively spontaneously to introduce Microsoft Copilot company-wide. The expectations were clear: to increase efficiency, promote innovation and use the latest technologies in order to stay ahead of the competition. The original request to us was to support this roll-out, particularly from a data protection perspective, and to identify the “biggest pitfalls”.

The realization: A tool is not yet a strategy

Even in the initial discussions and workshops, it became clear what we often experience: There is great enthusiasm for the technological possibilities of AI tools such as Copilot, but awareness of the associated legal and organizational implications is often less pronounced initially. Those responsible on the client side quickly realized in our collaboration that an isolated view of the introduction of Copilot falls short of the mark.

The following questions arose:

  • How do we ensure that the use of Copilot and future AI applications complies with the strict requirements of the GDPR and other relevant laws, such as the AI Act?
  • What data may be fed into the system at all? How do we handle sensitive client information or employees’ personal data?
  • Who is responsible for the results generated by AI?
  • How do we create transparency for our employees and clients regarding the use of AI?
  • How do we establish a process that enables us to evaluate future AI solutions in a structured manner and implement them safely?

It became clear that the desire for Copilot was just the tip of the iceberg. What the company really needed was a solid foundation – a comprehensive AI framework that would regulate and control the use of artificial intelligence throughout the company.

 

A global company needs global standards with local adaptability

The development of such a framework for a global consulting company with various business units and a large number of employees presented a number of challenges:

  • Legal complexity: International data protection standards and AI legislation, which was still developing at the time, had to be taken into account.
  • Organizational integration: AI governance should be seamlessly embedded in existing compliance structures and company processes.
  • Change management: Employees had to be sensitized and trained in order to promote acceptance and responsible use of AI.
  • Practicability: The guidelines and processes to be developed should not only be theoretically sound, but also practicable in day-to-day business.

 

Our solution: a customized AI framework

Together with the client, we have developed a multi-level AI framework based on the following core components:

The AI policy – the basic law for AI in the company

The first component we formulated was the AI policy. It was important that

  • the directive defines clear principles and rules for the responsible and legally compliant use of AI.
  • it addresses ethical aspects, data protection, data security, transparency obligations and responsibilities.
  • the guideline classifies the risks of AI applications and derives protective measures from this.

Information and training materials for the roll-out

To bring the AI policy to life, we developed easy-to-understand guidelines, FAQs and training documents for various target groups within the company.
The aim was not only to impart knowledge, but also to raise awareness of the opportunities and risks of AI and establish a positive error culture when dealing with new technologies.

An agile AI governance process

At the heart of the framework is a clearly defined process that enables the company to evaluate new AI projects in a structured manner, identify risks and make approval decisions on a solid basis. This process includes, among other things

  • A central point of contact for AI initiatives
  • A standardized evaluation procedure (incl. data protection impact assessment where necessary)
  • The involvement of relevant stakeholders (data protection, IT security, legal department, works council)
  • Regular review and adaptation of the AI solutions used

The result: legal certainty, transparency and professional AI management

By implementing this AI framework, our client has not only put the introduction of MS Copilot on a secure footing, but is now generally in a position to manage the potential of AI solutions in a professional, transparent and legally compliant manner.

The advantages of an AI framework are manifold

Minimization of legal risks: The AI framework ensures that the company complies with data protection regulations. It is therefore also well prepared for future AI regulations.

  • Strengthened trust: Transparency towards employees and customers creates trust in the use of AI.
  • Clear responsibilities: Defined roles and processes ensure clarity and traceability.
  • Promoting innovation with guard rails: employees can test and use new AI tools within the framework of clear guidelines.
  • Future viability: The company is well equipped to shape future AI developments proactively and responsibly.

 

Conclusion: AI implementation needs more than technology – it needs governance

The case of this global consulting firm is a good example of how the mere acquisition of AI technology is not enough to leverage its benefits sustainably and securely. It requires strategic anchoring in the company, supported by clear AI governance that combines legal requirements, ethical considerations and practical feasibility. The initial, focused inquiry regarding MS Copilot thus developed into a fundamental project that now enables the client to fully exploit the opportunities offered by artificial intelligence – and to do so with the necessary security and professionalism.

 

We would be happy to discuss with you how your company can also shape the path to customized and future-proof AI governance.

 

Dr. Jyn Schultze-Melling is also part of the League of Lawour new series. You can find out more about him and his work in Episode 2 “Big Data, Big Business”.

Explore #more

09.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Claims Management for Cyber Incidents: How Insurers Actively Manage Claims

Cyber incidents are among the most complex claims scenarios for insurers. Ransomware attacks, in particular, can paralyze entire IT infrastructures—with enormous financial consequences. Insurers for …

08.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest Column in AUTOHAUS: Consumer Credit Directive: Sales Under New Circumstances

Car dealerships should use the time remaining before the new Consumer Credit Directive takes effect to systematically review their financing and sales processes for regulatory…

08.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview with HAUFE: Even If AI Makes a Mistake, the Board of Directors Is Still Liable

AI analyzes, makes recommendations, and helps make decisions. But who bears the consequences if it’s wrong? KPMG Law experts Nikolaus Vincent Manthey and Sabrina Riesenbeck…

30.09.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Mixed-Use Real Estate as an Opportunity for Downtown Areas

Downtown areas should be vibrant, sustainable, and attractive. But the traditional business model behind them—retail—is becoming less and less viable. Rents are high, customers are…

28.09.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG are advising Rohde & Schwarz on the acquisitions of NEOSAT and PHYTRONIC

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised the Munich-based technology group Rohde & Schwarz on its acquisitions of NEOSAT GmbH…

28.09.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG are advising Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Dr. Carls aerial imagery database

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Diehl Defence on its acquisition of the aerial imagery database Dr. Carls GmbH.…

26.09.2026 | In the media

Op-Ed in *Lebensmittelzeitung*: PPWR Introduces New Requirements for the Food Industry

The EU Packaging Regulation (PPWR) has been in effect since August 12, 2026—and presents companies in the food industry with a question that requires urgent…

18.09.2026 | Press releases

KPMG Law Honored at the PMN Management Awards

KPMG Law was awarded first place in the Business Development category at this year’s PMN Management Awards. In addition, the project “The Agent-Based Law Firm”…

18.09.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

How the Data Act Affects the Drafting of Lease Agreements

The EU Data Act is also of great significance to the real estate industry, as modern commercial properties have become data spaces. Heating and air…

15.09.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Reporting Deadlines for Cyber Incidents Under the GDPR, BSIG, and CRA—Every Hour Counts

After a cyber incident, companies have only 24 or 72 hours to file their initial report with the authorities. A single incident can trigger multiple…

Contact

Dr. Jyn Schultze-Melling, LL.M.

Partner

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.: +49 30 530199 410
jschultzemelling@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll