Search
Contact
12.06.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

From AI tool to AI framework – a workshop report

It started with a few questions about Microsoft Copilot – and ended with a company-wide AI framework. We were able to provide the company, a global consulting firm, with legal and strategic support along the way. The example shows why well thought-out AI governance requires far more than just investing in licenses.

The trigger: “We are introducing MS Copilot – can you help us?”

It all began with a phone call that we often encounter in practice. Driven by the promise of generative AI, a leading international consulting firm had decided relatively spontaneously to introduce Microsoft Copilot company-wide. The expectations were clear: to increase efficiency, promote innovation and use the latest technologies in order to stay ahead of the competition. The original request to us was to support this roll-out, particularly from a data protection perspective, and to identify the “biggest pitfalls”.

The realization: A tool is not yet a strategy

Even in the initial discussions and workshops, it became clear what we often experience: There is great enthusiasm for the technological possibilities of AI tools such as Copilot, but awareness of the associated legal and organizational implications is often less pronounced initially. Those responsible on the client side quickly realized in our collaboration that an isolated view of the introduction of Copilot falls short of the mark.

The following questions arose:

  • How do we ensure that the use of Copilot and future AI applications complies with the strict requirements of the GDPR and other relevant laws, such as the AI Act?
  • What data may be fed into the system at all? How do we handle sensitive client information or employees’ personal data?
  • Who is responsible for the results generated by AI?
  • How do we create transparency for our employees and clients regarding the use of AI?
  • How do we establish a process that enables us to evaluate future AI solutions in a structured manner and implement them safely?

It became clear that the desire for Copilot was just the tip of the iceberg. What the company really needed was a solid foundation – a comprehensive AI framework that would regulate and control the use of artificial intelligence throughout the company.

 

A global company needs global standards with local adaptability

The development of such a framework for a global consulting company with various business units and a large number of employees presented a number of challenges:

  • Legal complexity: International data protection standards and AI legislation, which was still developing at the time, had to be taken into account.
  • Organizational integration: AI governance should be seamlessly embedded in existing compliance structures and company processes.
  • Change management: Employees had to be sensitized and trained in order to promote acceptance and responsible use of AI.
  • Practicability: The guidelines and processes to be developed should not only be theoretically sound, but also practicable in day-to-day business.

 

Our solution: a customized AI framework

Together with the client, we have developed a multi-level AI framework based on the following core components:

The AI policy – the basic law for AI in the company

The first component we formulated was the AI policy. It was important that

  • the directive defines clear principles and rules for the responsible and legally compliant use of AI.
  • it addresses ethical aspects, data protection, data security, transparency obligations and responsibilities.
  • the guideline classifies the risks of AI applications and derives protective measures from this.

Information and training materials for the roll-out

To bring the AI policy to life, we developed easy-to-understand guidelines, FAQs and training documents for various target groups within the company.
The aim was not only to impart knowledge, but also to raise awareness of the opportunities and risks of AI and establish a positive error culture when dealing with new technologies.

An agile AI governance process

At the heart of the framework is a clearly defined process that enables the company to evaluate new AI projects in a structured manner, identify risks and make approval decisions on a solid basis. This process includes, among other things

  • A central point of contact for AI initiatives
  • A standardized evaluation procedure (incl. data protection impact assessment where necessary)
  • The involvement of relevant stakeholders (data protection, IT security, legal department, works council)
  • Regular review and adaptation of the AI solutions used

The result: legal certainty, transparency and professional AI management

By implementing this AI framework, our client has not only put the introduction of MS Copilot on a secure footing, but is now generally in a position to manage the potential of AI solutions in a professional, transparent and legally compliant manner.

The advantages of an AI framework are manifold

Minimization of legal risks: The AI framework ensures that the company complies with data protection regulations. It is therefore also well prepared for future AI regulations.

  • Strengthened trust: Transparency towards employees and customers creates trust in the use of AI.
  • Clear responsibilities: Defined roles and processes ensure clarity and traceability.
  • Promoting innovation with guard rails: employees can test and use new AI tools within the framework of clear guidelines.
  • Future viability: The company is well equipped to shape future AI developments proactively and responsibly.

 

Conclusion: AI implementation needs more than technology – it needs governance

The case of this global consulting firm is a good example of how the mere acquisition of AI technology is not enough to leverage its benefits sustainably and securely. It requires strategic anchoring in the company, supported by clear AI governance that combines legal requirements, ethical considerations and practical feasibility. The initial, focused inquiry regarding MS Copilot thus developed into a fundamental project that now enables the client to fully exploit the opportunities offered by artificial intelligence – and to do so with the necessary security and professionalism.

 

We would be happy to discuss with you how your company can also shape the path to customized and future-proof AI governance.

 

Dr. Jyn Schultze-Melling is also part of the League of Lawour new series. You can find out more about him and his work in Episode 2 “Big Data, Big Business”.

Explore #more

30.10.2026 | Unkategorisiert

New Podcast in the Packaging Journal: PWR in Practice—Who Is Liable, Who Pays, and What Are the Current Rules?

The core obligations of the PPWR have been in effect since August 12, 2026. In the Packaging People podcast, Dr. Simon Meyer of KPMG Law…

29.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG and KPMG Law Article in *Betriebs-Berater*: Pitfalls in Customs Law

In light of geopolitical changes, new trade barriers, and more rigorous audits, customs and foreign trade law are increasingly becoming a focus for companies. The…

27.10.2026 | In the media

Op-Ed in Versicherungsmonitor: The Environment Is Finally Becoming a Compliance Risk

With the implementation of the new EU Environmental Criminal Law Directive, the environment is becoming a core area of managerial liability. Managers face reputational damage,…

27.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Federal Court of Justice on the Summary Report: Tax-Exempt but Still a Criminal Offense

Can someone be punished for sales tax evasion even if the sales were subsequently deemed tax-exempt? Yes, says the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) in…

23.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

PHP2Shell may trigger legal obligations for companies

Two critical vulnerabilities in the PHP programming language are threatening web applications and digital products worldwide. The Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) has warned…

20.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest Column in it daily: The Business Judgment Rule and the Use of AI

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence presents corporate leadership with diverse and far-reaching decisions. These decisions concern not only the selection and deployment of appropriate…

19.10.2026 | In the media

New articles have been published in PERSONALFÜHRUNG

The current issue of PERSONALFÜHRUNG (10–11/2026) features two articles by female experts from KPMG and KPMG Law. In the article “Will AI Save the Day?…

15.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Faster Building Permits – Legal Options for Businesses

Planning and permitting procedures do not always have to delay construction projects. The law provides several options for expediting the process. To take advantage of…

09.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Claims Management for Cyber Incidents: How Insurers Actively Manage Claims

Cyber incidents are among the most complex claims scenarios for insurers. Ransomware attacks, in particular, can paralyze entire IT infrastructures—with enormous financial consequences. Insurers for …

08.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest Column in AUTOHAUS: Consumer Credit Directive: Sales Under New Circumstances

Car dealerships should use the time remaining before the new Consumer Credit Directive takes effect to systematically review their financing and sales processes for regulatory…

Contact

Dr. Jyn Schultze-Melling, LL.M.

Partner

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.: +49 30 530199 410
jschultzemelling@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll