Search
Contact
26.10.2018 | KPMG Law Insights

DSGVO fine imposed

GDPR: Portuguese supervisory authority imposes fine of EUR 400,000 on hospital

The Portuguese data protection supervisory authority has imposed a fine of EUR 400,000 on a hospital. This is – at least as far as is known – the first significant fine across Europe following the entry into force of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on May 25, 2018.

Background

The Portuguese data protection authority CNPD (Comissão Nacional de Protecção de Dados) has announced that a large part of the fine was based on the fact that too many people had access to patient data at the hospital concerned. For example, data that was supposed to be accessible only to physicians could also be accessed by technicians. In addition, nearly 1,000 users were registered in the system as “doctors,” although the hospital actually employed just under 300 physicians.

Legal classification

Personal data must be protected – and not just since the DSGVO came into force – in such a way that only those employees have access who actually have to work with precisely this data and therefore need access. This principle is now also explicitly enshrined in law under the heading “privacy by design” (or “data protection through technology design”).

This principle applies in particular to the hospital sector, since this involves especially sensitive data that is also protected by criminal law in Germany. An incident like the one in Portugal could therefore also bring the law enforcement authorities on the scene in Germany.

Evaluation

The hospital reportedly plans to take legal action against the fine. In this respect, it remains to be seen whether the competent courts share the legal assessment of the data protection authority and, in particular, consider the amount of the fine to be appropriate.

Basically, according to the known facts, this is a serious case, which, moreover, concerns particularly sensitive data. However, it also shows that the authorities are prepared not only to look for very obvious violations, but also to delve deeper into the systems of those responsible.

Recommendation

The German data protection supervisory authorities issued guidance on the use of hospital information systems years ago. One focus of this guidance is on the design of access rights. It can be assumed that the recommendations contained in the guidance will largely remain valid after the GDPR comes into force.

Those responsible – not only from the healthcare sector – are therefore well advised to put their authorization concepts to the test. In the case of official controls, the responsible party must demonstrate an authorization concept in which access is limited to what is actually required. The controller must also be able to use it to justify why a person needs access to certain data. Even the lack of proof (under the keyword “accountability”) can trigger a fine.

Explore #more

11.09.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

The Procurement Acceleration Act and Sustainable Procurement: What Is Permitted and What Is Required?

The Public Procurement Acceleration Act took effect on July 1, 2026. The Act implements the reform of public procurement law that has been under discussion…

08.09.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises the shareholders and management of KODIAK on the sale of shares and the strategic partnership with Bencis

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) advised the shareholders and management of KODIAK GmbH (KODIAK) on the sale of shares to Bencis and the establishment…

07.09.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law advises Bosch Rexroth on the sale of its Active Shuttle product business to Neura Robotics

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) has provided legal counsel to Bosch Rexroth AG (Bosch Rexroth) in the sale of its product business related to…

31.08.2026 | In the media

Op-Ed in the Börsen-Zeitung – Interim Assessment of the European Crypto Regulation MiCAR

A year and a half after MiCAR took effect, it is clear that, despite European guidelines, there are still misunderstandings regarding the requirements. KPMG Law…

19.08.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in HAUFE: Even If AI Makes a Mistake, the Board of Directors Is Still Liable

AI analyzes, makes recommendations, and helps make decisions. But who bears the consequences if it makes a mistake? KPMG Law experts Vincent Manthey and Sabrina

19.08.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Article in Bloomberg Tax: Germany’s Tax Crime Action Plan Pushes the Boundaries of the Constitution

The new 26-point action plan against tax and financial crime, issued by Germany’s finance and justice ministries, signals a shift toward tougher sanctions, closer interagency…

13.08.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Federal Ministry of Finance Presents Draft Bill on Mandatory Use of Electronic Cash Registers and Combating Tax Evasion

In July 2026, the Federal Ministry of Finance (BMF) and the Federal Ministry of Justice (BMJV) presented an action plan to combat tax and financial

11.08.2026 | In the media

Guest article in *Versicherungsmonitor* on the topic of cyber claims regulation

Cyberattacks—particularly ransomware campaigns—pose challenges for insurers when it comes to claims settlement. When entire IT infrastructures at insured companies come to a standstill and the…

11.08.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Transparency Requirements Under Article 50 of the AI Act: Companies Should Address These Questions Now

The transparency requirements of the EU AI Act have been in effect since August 2, 2026. These obligations apply to chatbots, AI assistants, avatars, synthetic…

10.08.2026 | In the media

Op-Ed on the Procurement Acceleration Act and Sustainable Public Procurement

On April 23, 2026, the Bundestag passed the Act on Accelerating the Award of Public Contracts. After the Act was published in the Federal Law…

Contact

Sebastian Hoegl, LL.M. (Wellington)

Senior Manager
Lawyer
Specialist lawyer for IT law
LL.M. (Wellington)

Heinrich-von-Stephan-Straße 23
79100 Freiburg im Breisgau

Tel.: +49 761 769999-20
shoegl@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll