Search
Contact
08.05.2019 | KPMG Law Insights

Company pension plan – difference for new pension commitments in the year of publication of new mortality tables

Difference in the case of new pension commitments in the year of publication of new mortality tables (BFH, decision dated February 13, 2019, XI R 34/16)

Christine Hansen and Jean-Baptiste Abel

The plaintiff was a limited liability company (GmbH) that issued a pension commitment to its shareholder managing director in November 2005. The amount reported does not include any additional amount due to the changes in the Heubeck 2005 mortality tables, which were applicable for the first time in 2005, compared with the Heubeck 1998 mortality tables. The tax office assumed that a difference based on the first-time application of the 2005 mortality tables would also have to be spread over three years in the year of the first commitment.
The BFH ruled that no distribution was to be made. The wording of the provision in § 6a para. 4 sentence 2 EStG requires a difference between the partial value of the pension obligation at the end of the fiscal year and at the end of the previous fiscal year. There is no difference when a pension provision is initially recognized. A distribution of the difference is therefore not possible in assessment periods in which a pension commitment is made. The purpose of the provision does not permit any other result either, as it cannot be inferred from the legislative materials that the provision is intended to be applied beyond the wording also to cases of the first-time formation of a pension provision. The BFH thus rejects the opinion of the BMF most recently expressed in the BMF letter of October 19, 2018 (para. 2 therein) that the transfer must take place uniformly for all pension obligations.

Conclusion: Remarkably, the BFH does not base its decision on the fact that the commitment was made after the publication of the new 2015 mortality tables. The decision is thus likely to apply to all new commitments made in the year of the new board’s publication – regardless of whether they were made before or after its publication. The decisive factor should be that a provision was recognized for the first time at the end of the year in question. The decision is particularly topical due to the fact that the 2018 G Heubeck mortality tables were published last year.

Explore #more

14.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

BGH on customer installations: Decision orders application in line with the directive

In a ruling dated May 13, 2025, the BGH classified the supply infrastructure in the specific case of a residential complex in Zwickau as a…

13.05.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law expert in Spiegel article on energy policy

Dirk-Henning Meier, Senior Manager in the energy law department at KPMG Law, is quoted in a recent article on energy policy in Der Spiegel.…

13.05.2025 | Career, In the media

azur Karriere Magazin – All AI or what?

Artificial intelligence has long since arrived in law firms and legal departments. But dealing with it is a skill that needs to be learned. Many…

13.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Initial experience with the Single-Use Plastics Fund Act: what manufacturers should bear in mind

Beverage cups, foil and plastic cigarette filters litter streets, parks and sidewalks. The cleaning costs are borne by the local authorities. The Disposable Plastics Fund…

07.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Termination of fixed-term rental agreements in the case of pre-leasing

In the case of a pre-leasing, the tenancy only begins at a later date, usually the handover date. In such cases, the contracting parties usually…

06.05.2025 | In the media

Wirtschaftswoche honors KPMG Law

KPMG Law was named “TOP Law Firm 2025” in the field of M&A by WirtschaftsWoche. Ian Maywald, Partner at KPMG Law in Munich, was…

06.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Social insurance obligation for teachers – transitional rule creates clarity

Teachers and lecturers are often hired on a self-employed basis. This practice makes the German pension insurance fund sit up and take notice. It is…

02.05.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in FINANCE Magazine: How CFOs can save up to 80 percent in the legal department

The cost pressure in companies is increasing – also in legal departments. Two strategies have now become established to save 50 to 80 percent of…

30.04.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law study in the Neue Kämmerer: How does the special fund get into the municipalities?

A special fund of 500 billion euros is to finance investments in infrastructure over the next twelve years. Of this, 100 billion euros are earmarked…

29.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Anti-money laundering and transparency register – what will the new government change?

According to the coalition agreement, the future government wants to “resolutely combat” money laundering and financial crime. The coalition partners have announced that legal…

Contact

Christine Hansen

Senior Manager
Leiterin Betriebliche Altersversorgung

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.: +49 30 530199150
christinehansen@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll