21.09.2020 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

Association Sanctions – Association Sanctions Act – First Passage in the Bundesrat

Association Sanctions Act – First Passage in the Bundesrat

On September 18, 2020, the government’s draft bill on strengthening integrity in business (BR-Drs. 440/20) passed the first round in the Bundesrat. The big bang failed to materialize: The Bundesrat did not follow the motions of the lead legal committee and the economic committee to reject the government bill in general. Instead, a large number of auxiliary motions from the committees recommending selective changes were approved.

There was no majority in the Bundesrat for these proposed amendments:

  • Introduction of a legally limited right to prosecute instead of the strict obligation to prosecute and, as a result, the extension of the scope of application also to associations whose purpose is not directed at a commercial business operation.
  • In the case of an offense committed by a manager, the existence of appropriate compliance structures should preclude the offense or at least lead to the proceedings being dropped.
  • The turnover-based sanction framework for associations with annual sales of more than EUR 100 million is to be reviewed with regard to the principle of proportionality and, if necessary, replaced by a less restrictive regulation.
  • Applicability to associations with an economic business operation within the meaning of Section 14 of the German Fiscal Code. This would cover economically active ideal associations, e.g. in the field of professional sports and social work.
  • The payment of a fine as part of the discontinuation of proceedings should also be possible for the benefit of a charitable institution, not only for the benefit of the state treasury.
  • Deletion of the requirement for “uninterrupted and full cooperation” in the context of internal association investigations.
  • Deletion of the exclusive jurisdiction of the court of lay assessors at the district court for association sanction proceedings

The following changes are recommended:

  • Extension of the possibilities of setting if the association responsibility does not carry considerable weight in addition to the individual fault (e.g. in the case of one-man limited liability companies, substrate-less associations, etc.).
  • Small and medium-sized enterprises (“SMEs”): As part of the further legislative process, it should be examined whether the liability and sanctions for SMEs are designed in a proportionate manner and to what extent certain associative acts should be exempted altogether
  • Acts of non-management personnel shall only be attributed to the association if management personnel have intentionally or negligently failed to take the required compliance measures; the mere existence of an objective organizational deficit is not sufficient.
  • The possibility of public announcement of the sanction shall be deleted
  • Revision of procedural rules with the aim of speeding up the procedure and preventing abuse,B. by removing essential procedural acts from the main hearing;
  • No right of the legal representatives of the association to refuse to testify
  • Admissibility of Investigative Measures Interfering with Postal and Telecommunications Secrecy
  • Review whether the extension of the territorial scope to foreign acts does not go too far. If necessary, the sanctioning of foreign acts by domestic associations should be linked to further criteria,B. a substantial business operation or significant domestic damage
  • Abolition of the particularly serious case and reduction of the enforcement and redemption period to a uniform 10 years
  • The liability of the legal successor should not exceed the value of the assets taken over (as in Section 30 (2a) sentence 2 OWiG).
  • A waiver of prosecution in the event of insolvency should also be possible in the event of insolvency maturity without an insolvency petition having been filed
  • The transition period until the law comes into force is to be extended from two to three years.

Instead of a big bang, there were many substantive proposals that need to be discussed with the other proposals of the associations in the legislative process. The statement of the Bundesrat together with any counter-statement of the Federal Government shall be forwarded to the Bundestag together with the government bill. It is not binding on either the Bundestag or the Bundesrat in the further legislative process. It does, however, indicate how the Bundesrat might decide on the consent bill in the second round.


Explore #more

13.06.2024 | Press releases

Handelsblatt and Best Lawyers honor KPMG Law Experts

Best Lawyers has once again identified the best commercial lawyers in Germany for 2024 exclusively for Handelsblatt. A total of 28 lawyers were honored by…

27.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Agreement on ecodesign regulation: products to become more sustainable

After lengthy negotiations, the Council and Parliament of the European Union reached a provisional agreement on the Ecodesign Regulation on the night of December 5,…

22.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

The AI Act is coming: EU wants to get a grip on AI risks

For many people, artificial intelligence (AI) is the great hope for business, healthcare and science. But there are also plenty of critics who fear the…

17.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: When the family business is to be sold

Around 38,000 family businesses are currently handed over each year. In most cases, the change of ownership takes place within the family. But more and…

03.05.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Doubts about inability to work? What employers can do

The certificate of incapacity for work (AU certificate) serves as proof of incapacity for work due to illness. However, only if the certificate meets certain…

27.03.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

EU Buildings Directive: life cycle greenhouse potential becomes relevant

On March 12, 2024, the EU Parliament approved the amendment to the EU Buildings Directive. The directive obliges member states and, indirectly, building owners and…

19.03.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, KPMG Law Insights

CSDDD: Provisional agreement on the EU Supply Chain Directive

The EU member states agreed on the CSDDD, the EU Supply Chain Directive, on March 15, 2024. Germany abstained from the vote. Negotiators from the…

21.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

The Digital Services Act – what does it mean for companies?

The Digital Services Act (DSA) is a key component of the EU’s digital strategy and came into force on November 16, 2022. As a regulation,…

15.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Data compliance management: How to implement it in practice

Part 3 of the article series “Professional tips for data compliance management”   The third part of this series of articles deals with data compliance

14.02.2024 | Business Performance & Resilience, PR Publications

Guest article in ZURe: Monitoring the implementation of the LkSG

The current issue of ZURe (p. 20 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Law Partner Thomas Uhlig (Head of General Business and Commercial Law),…


Dr. Konstantin von Busekist

Managing Partner
Head of Global Compliance Practice
KPMG Law EMA Leader

Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

tel: +49 211 4155597123

Philipp Schiml


Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

tel: +49 211 4155597150

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.