14.10.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Advocate General at the ECJ: Minimum and maximum rates of the HOAI no longer applicable even in old cases between private parties

Advocate General at the ECJ: Minimum and maximum rates of the HOAI no longer applicable even in old cases between private parties

In his opinion of July 15, 2021, the Advocate General at the ECJ Maciej Szpunar emphasized for fee disputes under the validity of the HOAI 2013 that even in old cases between private parties the maximum and minimum rates of the HOAI 2013 no longer constitute mandatory price law. It is permissible to fall below the minimum rates and to exceed the maximum rates, provided that the parties agreed on a fee outside the price range of the HOAI 2013. This also applies to disputes between parties under private law, even if the relevant Services Directive (Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market – OJ 2006 L 376, p. 36) is not directly applicable in the horizontal relationship between private parties.

According to Advocate General Szpunar, the obligation of national courts to no longer apply the minimum and maximum rates in old cases as well results from the special character of the provisions of the Services Directive concretizing the freedom of establishment enshrined in the Treaty as well as from the required respect for the fundamental right of freedom of contract guaranteed in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU.

The starting point for the proceedings before the ECJ was a question referred by the BGH as to how European law, in particular the Services Directive, was to be interpreted in the case of legal disputes between private parties under the then validity of the HOAI 2013. The BGH had to review a judgment of KG Berlin dated May 12, 2020 – 21 U 125/19. In its ruling, the KG had come to the conclusion that the Services Directive was not directly applicable to the detriment of the architect or engineer within a private legal relationship. Other higher regional courts (e.g. OLG Celle, judgment of 17.07.2019 – 14 U 188/18), on the other hand, had – now in line with the Advocate General’s opinion – left the minimum and maximum rates of HOAI 2013 unapplied due to the primacy of application of European law. KPMG Law had also reported on the state of opinion to date:

It remains to be seen how the ECJ will now rule on the question referred by the BGH, taking into account the Opinion. However, in practice, the Opinions are a fairly reliable indicator of European opinion. As a result of the ECJ’s decision, the BGH will then decide on the appeal against the judgment of the KG Berlin, taking into account the interpretation requirements from Europe.

For planner and engineer contracts concluded since January 1, 2021, the HOAI 2021 applies, which no longer provides for mandatory pricing law as a result of the ECJ ruling of July 4, 2019 (Case C-377/17):

Source: ECJ Press Release No. 140/2021 v. 15.07.2021

Explore #more

21.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

The Digital Services Act – what does it mean for companies?

The Digital Services Act (DSA) is a key component of the EU’s digital strategy and came into force on November 16, 2022. As a regulation,…

15.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Data compliance management: How to implement it in practice

Part 3 of the article series “Professional tips for data compliance management”   The third part of this series of articles deals with data compliance

14.02.2024 | PR Publications

Guest article in ZURe: Monitoring the implementation of the LkSG

The current issue of ZURe (p. 20 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Law Partner Thomas Uhlig (Head of General Business and Commercial Law),…

14.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

The AI Act is coming: EU wants to get a grip on AI risks

For many people, artificial intelligence (AI) is the great hope for business, healthcare and science. But there are also plenty of critics who fear the…

09.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: The employment law function

In almost all German companies, the employment law function is located in the HR department and not in the legal department. One of the reasons…

02.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

CSDDD: Provisional agreement on the EU Supply Chain Directive

On December 14, 2023, the Council and the European Parliament reached a provisional political agreement on the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). This…

01.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: Fair play in eSports

eSports is a billion-dollar market that is growing rapidly. This makes it all the more important for the economic players involved to comply with applicable…

24.01.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

How the new unitary patent works – ten facts

The new unitary patent can be applied for at the European Patent Office (EPO) from June 1, 2023. The Implementing Regulations and the Schedule of

22.01.2024 | PR Publications

Guest article in the Börsen-Zeitung on the subject of EU antitrust regulations

Agreements with competitors on sustainability efforts may violate antitrust law. Which legal interest should then take precedence? KPMG Law expert Jonas Brueckner discusses this question…

18.01.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

AI and copyright – what is permitted when using LLMs?

A few months ago, new players entered the legal scene and have since caused numerous legal discussions: Large Language Models (LLM), better known as…


Dr. Torsten Göhlert


Galeriestraße 2
01067 Dresden

tel: +49 351 21294423

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.