Search
Contact
28.06.2014 | KPMG Law Insights

New Union framework for R&D aid adopted

Dear Readers,

The time has come: the EU framework for state aid to promote research, development and innovation, which was already the subject of extremely controversial debate in its draft version, was adopted by the EU Commission on May 21, 2014 and will enter into force on July 1, 2014.

So far, only the English version of the Union Framework is available, which – in relation to the draft version of the Union Framework – already contains some surprising innovations. In our first article, we report on some of the most important new regulations in the R&D aid area and will provide you with a comprehensive overview in the next issues – as soon as the German version with its concrete wording is available.

But that is not enough of the new regulations on state aid: The new GBER, which was adopted by the EU Commission at the same time as the EU Framework, also contains a number of changes in state aid law that must be observed by the research community, including research institutions and universities. In addition, the EU Commission has defined requirements for transparency in the granting of subsidies.

Furthermore, you will find a summary from the BMBF Federal Report on Research and Innovation 2014 as well as from the DZHW report on the development of dropout rates at German universities. Both contain topics that are extremely exciting for higher education practitioners. From the case law on public procurement, we present a decision of the Higher Regional Court of Koblenz, which deals with bidder information and its scope.

We wish you interesting reading!

Sincerely yours

Public Sector Team of KPMG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH

Mathias Oberndörfer Dr. Anke Empting

On May 21, 2014, the EU Commission has now finally adopted the Union Framework for State Aid for Research, Development and Innovation. The goal is to increase R&D spending to three percent of gross domestic product in order to boost economic growth.

The first level of review is then the General Block Exemption Regulation (GBER), which sets out the conditions for granting aid without notification. The new EU framework basically starts at the second level and sets out the criteria on the basis of which the EU Commission examines R&D measures that neither fall outside the scope of EU state aid control at the factual level nor can be granted without notification under the GBER.

At the same time, the Union Framework specifies which R&D measures already do not qualify as economic activities within the meaning of EU state aid law. In this context, it is important to first clarify the term “independent collaborative research”: Here, the Union Framework now explicitly clarifies that this only includes R&D projects that are initiated by a research institution or research infrastructure – also jointly with other research institutions and research infrastructures – and are not carried out on behalf of a company.

Technology transfer as a special feature

Whereas under the old EU Framework this was already considered a non-economic activity if it was “an activity of a purely internal nature and all income from it was reinvested in the main activities of the research institutions”, now the income from technology/knowledge transfer must be fully reinvested in the main activities of the research institution or research infrastructure that carried out the technology/knowledge transfer.

In contrast, the new Union framework provides for a significant relief for those research institutions or research infrastructures that carry out both economic and non-economic activities, but whose non-economic areas of activity clearly outweigh the economic ones on a permanent basis. A state measure is unobjectionable under state aid law if, on the one hand, the economic activity is merely a subordinate activity, is necessarily connected with or required for the non-economic activity, and, on the other hand, is limited in scope to a maximum of 20% of the total annual budget.

EU Commission exempts further aid from notification requirement

With the new GBER, member states can henceforth grant more aid measures and higher aid amounts without having to have them approved by the EU Commission. For some groups of aid, the scope has been extended through more flexible eligibility conditions, more favorable maximum aid intensities and higher aid amounts.

Aid for local infrastructure, for broadband, research and energy infrastructure, innovation clusters, regional urban development funds, for culture and heritage conservation, for audiovisual works, sports and recreational infrastructure, as well as aid to address the consequences of certain natural disasters are exempt from notification.

In addition, investment aid in favor of research infrastructure will in future be exempt under the terms of the GBER. From now on, there are simplified options for start-up companies. Universities and research institutions should note that aid that is not covered by the exemption option under the GBER is not necessarily considered illegal. Rather, these subsidies would only have to be notified to the EU Commission.

New transparency requirements for granting subsidies

According to a communication from the EU Commission on the introduction of new transparency rules for the granting of state aid, in future the bodies granting aid in the EU member states will have to publish the name of the recipient, the amount and purpose of the aid and its legal basis for disbursements of more than EUR 500,000. In addition, the individual member states must set up a special website showing, with regard to all grants of aid exceeding 500,000 euros, which companies have received state aid, how much this aid was and for what purpose it was granted.

Furthermore, it must be stated whether the recipient company is a so-called SME or a large company, where the recipient is based and which industry it belongs to. The required information must be published on national or regional websites within six months of the granting of the aid. The large-volume aid website is to be set up by each Member State within two years of the publication of the Transparency Notice.

Explore #more

07.11.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group. KPMG Law provided legal…

07.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Changes to the H-1B visa and their consequences for US hiring and secondment practices

President Trump’s administration has introduced two significant changes to the highly popular H-1B visa program for skilled workers: The previous random lottery will be replaced…

07.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement on HAUFE: Confusion surrounding the EU Deforestation Regulation – and what companies should do now

Possibly, perhaps, under certain circumstances, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) will not be binding for large and medium-sized enterprises on December 30, 2025 and for…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

External personnel: authorities tighten checks with AI support

AI is a blessing for many companies, but it can also quickly become a curse, especially when authorities use the technology to uncover legal violations…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Deforestation regulation – simplification instead of postponement?

In September, the EU Commission wanted to postpone the EUDR deforestation regulation. On October 21, 2025, it published a comprehensive proposal to simplify the EUDR

05.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Employer of Record now not subject to authorization after all – change of heart at BA

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Employment Agency (BA) updated its technical directives and made a U-turn with regard to the so-called employer-of-record model: In…

03.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

CO₂ contracts for difference: Participation in the preliminary procedure is a prerequisite for funding

Companies can apply for funding in the preliminary procedure for the climate protection contracts program until 1 December 2025. The funding from the Federal Ministry…

29.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Fund Risk Limitation Act and Location Promotion Act create new scope for infrastructure funds

As the federal government’s special infrastructure fund of 500 billion euros will probably not be enough to finance Germany’s roads, networks and the energy transition,…

29.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises management board of Nürnberger Beteiligungs-AG on sale to Vienna Insurance Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the Management Board of Nürnberger Beteiligungs-AG throughout the entire public takeover process by Vienna Insurance Group…

29.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

BAG on pair comparison: How employers should deal with salary differences

The Federal Labor Court (BAG) has issued another landmark decision on equal pay. In its ruling of October 23, 2025 (Ref. 8 AZR 300/24),…

Contact

Mathias Oberndörfer

Managing Partner
Geschäftsführer KPMG Law
Bereichsvorstand Öffentlicher Sektor KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Theodor-Heuss-Straße 5
70174 Stuttgart

Tel.: +49 711 781923410
moberndoerfer@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll