Search
Contact
27.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Cell Phone Inspections at US Border and Beyond: What to Expect

Key facts:

  • U.S. immigration officials monitor public social media data and travelers should be prepared to share details about their personal social media accounts.
  • All travelers to the USA may be subject to a search of their electronic devices at the US border.
  • Travelers to the USA should pay attention to what they post, like and share on social media and messenger services, even before entering the USA.

The media are increasingly reporting on searches of travelers entering the USA. These not only concern luggage, but also cell phones and other electronic devices.

This is legally possible, even if there is no search warrant. This is because a so-called “border exception” applies to these searches, as the USA has a profound national security interest in protecting its borders that outweighs the privacy interest of an individual person.

Why are cell phones and social media searched?

Why are the immigration authorities targeting the cell phones and, in particular, the social media channels of those entering the country? Social media offers a unique and comprehensive insight into the smallest details of a person. And it’s all stored on a single, pocket-sized device that everyone carries with them all the time.

Upon arrival in the U.S., all travelers must pass through Customs and Border Protection (CBP) passport control. Regardless of citizenship or visa type, CBP may identify travelers who they believe require additional inspection. Travelers may be selected for this additional secondary inspection randomly or for a specific purpose. The secondary inspection takes place in a separate room and can last from a few minutes to several hours. The officers may examine documents more closely, ask further questions about travel plans or examine the contents of cell phones, computers or cameras.

Non-US citizen travelers cannot object to these searches if they want to enter the USA. They must also grant access to their social media accounts and provide the officials with passwords if needed. Refusal may result in denial of entry to the US.

What are the authorities looking for?

In general, CBP looks for evidence that travelers are misrepresenting the purpose of their visit, engaging in criminal activity, or posing a threat to U.S. national security. Even more mundane content, such as posts or messages that disparage the U.S. government, its policy initiatives (foreign and domestic), or current geopolitical issues and events, can cause problems.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now also uses artificial intelligence to search cell phones in order to effortlessly search all publicly accessible social media data for topics of national interest. Such checks can also take place after travelers have crossed the border. Therefore, travelers should pay attention to what they post on the internet and share with their friends throughout the duration of their stay – and even in advance.

Social media best practices for those traveling to the US

Individuals traveling to the U.S. should review their privacy settings on their various social media accounts, including messengers such as WhatsApp and Signal, very carefully. In general, they should refrain from posting, commenting on or engaging with content online that relates to President Trump or his administration, the war in Gaza or any other current event that is known to be controversial or sensitive in the US political landscape.
At all points in the U.S. immigration process – when applying for a visa, during passport control, or while in the U.S. – travelers must provide accurate information about their social media use when asked. False or incomplete information about social media use and usernames may be considered intentional misrepresentation of facts to secure an immigration benefit. This may result in deportation from the US, revocation of the visa or even a travel ban to the US.

To reduce the likelihood of CBP finding a reason to inspect the cell phone, travelers should carry a physical copy of all itineraries, lodging addresses, relevant tickets, brochures, etc. with them during their trip and present the paper documents upon request.

US immigration law does not provide for a right of entry for non-US citizens. The immigration authorities also have a great deal of discretion. They are required by the current US government to interpret the regulations strictly. Therefore, people who want to enter the USA can only comply with all requirements and formalities, be polite and follow instructions.

Co-author: Sarah O’Neill, JD, Attorney-at-Law, Manager at KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH

 

Further article on the topic of posting employees to the USA and US immigration: Business Travel and Assignment in the USA: What you need to know about US immigration

 

Explore #more

23.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Travel and Assignment in the USA: What you need to know about US immigration

The recent changes in US immigration rules are causing uncertainty worldwide. In particular, since the new US government took office, processes regarding entry into the…

14.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

BGH on customer installations: Decision orders application in line with the directive

In a ruling dated May 13, 2025, the BGH classified the supply infrastructure in the specific case of a residential complex in Zwickau as a…

13.05.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law expert in Spiegel article on energy policy

Dirk-Henning Meier, Senior Manager in the energy law department at KPMG Law, is quoted in a recent article on energy policy in Der Spiegel.…

13.05.2025 | Career, In the media

azur Karriere Magazin – All AI or what?

Artificial intelligence has long since arrived in law firms and legal departments. But dealing with it is a skill that needs to be learned. Many…

13.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Initial experience with the Single-Use Plastics Fund Act: what manufacturers should bear in mind

Beverage cups, foil and plastic cigarette filters litter streets, parks and sidewalks. The cleaning costs are borne by the local authorities. The Disposable Plastics Fund…

07.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Termination of fixed-term rental agreements in the case of pre-leasing

In the case of a pre-leasing, the tenancy only begins at a later date, usually the handover date. In such cases, the contracting parties usually…

06.05.2025 | In the media

Wirtschaftswoche honors KPMG Law

KPMG Law was named “TOP Law Firm 2025” in the field of M&A by WirtschaftsWoche. Ian Maywald, Partner at KPMG Law in Munich, was…

06.05.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Social insurance obligation for teachers – transitional rule creates clarity

Teachers and lecturers are often hired on a self-employed basis. This practice makes the German pension insurance fund sit up and take notice. It is…

02.05.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in FINANCE Magazine: How CFOs can save up to 80 percent in the legal department

The cost pressure in companies is increasing – also in legal departments. Two strategies have now become established to save 50 to 80 percent of…

30.04.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law study in the Neue Kämmerer: How does the special fund get into the municipalities?

A special fund of 500 billion euros is to finance investments in infrastructure over the next twelve years. Of this, 100 billion euros are earmarked…

Contact

Sabine Paul, LL.M. (University of Stellenbosch)

Partner

Heidestraße 58
10557 Berlin

Tel.: +49 30 530199196
sabinepaul@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll