Search
Contact
14.03.2022 | KPMG Law Insights

The EU Data Act – Promising Approach or Further Obstacles?

The new EU Data Act is just around the corner. Promising approach or further impediments? We have already had a look at the design.

The regulation of digitization and data use is gaining new momentum. On February 23, 2022, the European Commission is expected to present the final draft of the Data Act, also known as the “Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on ensuring fairness in the allocation of value across the data economy” (“Data Act”).
We have already taken a look at the draft, which has not been officially published.

The Data Act is one of the European Commission’s many legislative initiatives as part of its data strategy aimed at improving fair access to and use of data. In this way, the European single market for data is to be strengthened across all sectors. Unlike the GDPR, the focus here is not on personal data, but on data in the true sense and thus on all digital representations of actions, facts or information.

The addressees are all companies active in the EU that collect data, process it, use it in their products or offer related services. This means that almost all companies that use data in some way for business purposes fall within its scope. Only micro and small enterprises are explicitly excluded.
Here are the main points:

  • Data Access By Default: Products and services must be designed to provide users with easy access to the data generated by their use.
  • Right of access to data: Companies are obliged to provide “users” (individuals or organizations) with access to the data they have helped to create. The idea is to provide access “in real time” and free of charge.
  • Improved interoperability: Users should be able to switch between different providers easily and free of charge.
  • Gatekeepers: So-called gatekeepers (providers of large online platforms) may not ask users to share their data with or receive data from gatekeepers. The term gatekeeper is defined in this context by the separate Digital Markets Act.
  • Sanctions: Enforcement of the Data Act is the responsibility of the authorities of the member states. In this context, violations are to be sanctioned, with any sanction requirements to be determined by the member states at the national level. It is expected, however, that the data protection authorities will also be able to impose sanctions for certain violations in accordance with the fine provisions of the GDPR.

 

Outlook

The target direction is correct. To boost the data economy in Europe, it is essential that the commercial use of machine data is opened up to the market and accompanied by clear rules. The approaches to create a certain interoperability is also very useful. However, many practical aspects are open.

The obligation to share self-generated data is a clear encroachment on contractual freedom. A close examination of proportionality is appropriate here. It should also be borne in mind that such a sharing obligation naturally lowers the willingness to invest in generating high-quality data.

High-value data are valuable trade secrets in many areas, and the draft so far contains only rudimentary approaches to protection. Although shared data may not be used for the development of competing products, it is also unclear how compliance with this obligation is to be ensured.

It remains exciting to see what content will ultimately make it into the release in just under two weeks. One thing is certain: the Data Act will result in numerous obligations for digital companies and will require extensive process adjustments in the long term.

Explore #more

25.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Special infrastructure assets: how the administration manages to implement projects quickly

The special infrastructure fund creates the opportunity to catch up on years of investment backlog. There is a need for urgency. Defence capability, economic growth…

21.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in Real Estate I Haufe: Substitute building materials: “Secondary is not second class”

The Substitute Building Materials Ordinance is intended to harmonize the circular economy in construction, but legal uncertainty and bureaucracy are holding it back. How can…

21.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Residential construction turbo: more living space on existing properties

Since October 30, 2025, new regulations on the creation of living space have been in force in the German Building Code (BauGB). At the heart…

19.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

New Packaging Implementation Act tightens obligations for companies

With a new Packaging Implementation Act (VerpackDG), German law is to be adapted to the EU Packaging Regulation. The Federal Ministry for the Environment…

18.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in the FAZ on the subject of deepfakes

Fraudsters can easily falsify invoices or even act as company bosses. Companies can defend themselves against this, but there are no miracle weapons against AI…

17.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Video surveillance in rental properties: What should landlords be aware of?

Video surveillance of rented properties is only possible under strict legal conditions. More and more owners want to keep an eye on and secure their…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

On November 13, 2025, the EU Parliament voted on its negotiating position regarding the so-called omnibus package, which provides for a relaxation of the CSRD,…

12.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in In-house Counsel: More stability under the umbrella of corporate governance

There is a lot of talk about “corporate governance” in the face of multiple crises and regulatory tendencies on the part of legislators. But what…

07.11.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group. KPMG Law provided legal…

Contact

Francois Heynike, LL.M. (Stellenbosch)

Partner
Head of Technology Law

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49-69-951195770
fheynike@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll