Search
Contact
27.07.2022 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

The countdown is on: Only 5 months left for Schrems II implementation deadline

The use of the new standard contractual clauses for data transfers to third countries has already been mandatory for new contracts since September 27, 2021. The corresponding implementing decision of the EU Commission ((EU) 2021/914 COM) gives those responsible until December 27, 2022 to adapt existing contractual relationships to the new models. Thereafter, all standard contractual clauses already concluded must also comply with the new requirements. As of today, those responsible have only five months left for the final implementation. However, this is not done with a mere exchange of forms.

Complex implementation

The conclusion of the new standard contractual clauses is not a mere formality, as both data transmitters and data recipients have additional obligations to fulfill. Particularly noteworthy is the obligation of the data transmitter to conduct a so-called “Transfer Impact Assessment” (abbreviated to “TIA”); i.e. an extensive risk assessment of the third country transfer in the individual case. In this context, the individual particularities of the law in the target country must be taken into account. Depending on the outcome, specific contractual, organizational or technical compensatory measures to protect personal data must be identified, agreed and implemented. As this can lead to considerable additional expenses for the data recipient, it is not self-evident that the relationship will continue under the current conditions.

Focus of the authorities

The legally compliant implementation of standard contractual clauses and the adoption of effective compensatory measures are currently the focus of regulatory activities. For example, the data protection supervisory authorities of France, Austria and Italy have now indicated that the compensatory measures provided by a search engine provider when using its analytics tool are not sufficient to ensure an adequate level of data protection. The responsible parties concerned were prohibited from using the analysis tool. The problems identified are likely to exist in a similar form at other U.S. providers. In addition, the data protection authorities of the states of Berlin, Lower Saxony, Rhineland-Palatinate, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Bavaria are currently conducting a coordinated review of web hosters’ order processing contracts. The questionnaire used for this purpose also contains a section on third-country transfers and asks which version of the standard contractual clauses is used for this purpose.

Liability risks

The use of previous templates is no longer permitted after the transposition deadline and would constitute a breach of Art. 44 and 46 of the General Data Protection Regulation. In particular, this may result in the prohibition of the relevant data processing as well as fines of up to 4% of the annual turnover or 20,000,000 euros. In each case, the higher amount is decisive. In addition, there is a risk of claims for damages from those affected and, if necessary, warnings from competitors. It should not be neglected that the implementation of the new requirements – due to the transparency obligations under data protection law – can be ascertained by third parties without much effort, which increases the risk for data controllers of becoming the target of such measures.

Conclusion

Responsible parties who have not yet started updating standard contractual clauses in use should do so now at the latest. Often there is a multitude of such contracts and each one of them – in addition to the creation of a TIA – has to be individually redrafted and negotiated. The adaptation process is multi-step and should not be underestimated in terms of its complexity. Delayed implementation is easy to spot and poses a high liability risk that can be avoided by acting early.

Explore #more

02.04.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Building Modernization Act (GMG): What is now important for companies

The planned Building Modernization Act (GMG) is set to replace significant parts of the previous Building Energy Act (GEG). Companies in the real estate industry,…

01.04.2026 | In the media

Manager Magazin: KPMG Law in first place for legal advice

Every two years, Manager Magazin, together with the Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Management und Beratung (WGMB), awards Germany’s best auditors with a “Best-in-Class” seal and evaluates

27.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Special Infrastructure Fund and State Aid Law: Orientation for Funding Practice and Planning

The special fund “Infrastructure and Climate Neutrality” (SVIK) also entails considerable responsibility under state aid law for federal states, municipalities and recipients of funds. Anyone

23.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law, KPMG Law AT as well as KPMG in Germany and KPMG in Austria advise GOLDBECK GmbH on the acquisition of 50 percent of the shares in ZAUNERGROUP Holding GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and Buchberger Ettmayer Rechtsanwälte GmbH (KPMG Law AT) as well as KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG in Germany) and KPMG…

19.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI: how governing bodies are liable for decisions

If an AI provides the basis for business decisions, the people responsible are liable, not the machine. This makes the use of artificial intelligence risky…

16.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

KPIs in the legal department: How legal becomes strategically effective through control, transparency and data analysis

Today, legal departments are facing a strategic turning point: they must reliably hedge risks, but at the same time enable speed, control costs and make…

13.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial courts: when they are worthwhile for companies – and when they are not

Large commercial disputes are given courts specially tailored to their needs: the Commercial Courts. The German legislator introduced it with the Act to Strengthen the

10.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Krasemann Hausverwaltung to Buena

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the KRASEMANN family on the sale of KRASEMANN Immobilien- & Gebäudeservice GmbH (KIGS) and KRASEMANN…

09.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR and whitepaper obligations – what the transitional regulations mean

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) has been in force for just over a year. Among other things, MiCAR obliges issuers and providers of crypto…

09.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Private Banking Magazine: What tokenized banknotes mean in day-to-day treasury operations

The future of payment transactions will be shaped not by new currencies, but by new processing models. A practical report by Marc Pussar (KPMG Law),…

Contact

Francois Heynike, LL.M. (Stellenbosch)

Partner
Head of Technology Law

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49-69-951195770
fheynike@kpmg-law.com

Miriam Oussalah

Manager

Münzgasse 2
04107 Leipzig

Tel.: +49 341 22572-500
moussalah@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll