Search
Contact
14.10.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Tax dispute – Six percent interest on taxes is unconstitutional

Six percent interest on taxes is unconstitutional

Long criticized, now declared unconstitutional: In a decision published on August 18, 2021, the German Federal Constitutional Court declares interest on back taxes and tax refunds at an annual rate of 6% unconstitutional from 2014.

For some time now, taxpayers have been unable to understand the amount of interest that the tax office charges for back taxes.
In a decision published on August 18, 2021, the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) basically confirmed this legal perception and declared the interest on back taxes at 6% per year for interest periods from January 1, 2014 to be unconstitutional.

In order to achieve the goal of full interest, namely to compensate for the fact that taxes are assessed and due at different times for individual taxpayers, interest at a rate of 0.5% per month is no longer justified in the opinion of the BVerfG since 2014. In this regard, the BVerfG makes it very clear that the interest rate of 6% per year has been evidently unrealistic since 2014 at the latest. For interest periods prior to 2014, however, this interest rate roughly corresponded to the relevant conditions on the money and capital markets according to the decision and was therefore not unconstitutional for these periods.

The incompatibility of interest pursuant to § 233a AO with the Basic Law includes not only back taxes but also interest on refunds in favor of taxpayers.

For taxpayers affected by this decision, however, it should be noted that the BVerfG has also stated that the previous law will continue to apply to interest periods from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018. Only for interest periods falling in 2019 are the provisions inapplicable.

The legislature is now required to enact new legislation by July 31, 2022, which will apply retroactively to all interest periods beginning in 2019 and cover all sovereign acts that have not yet become final.

Explore #more

23.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the Federal Network Agency’s FAQs mean for storage system operators

On October 17, 2025, the Federal Network Agency published FAQs on the regulatory treatment of stationary battery storage systems (“BESS”). The FAQs are a guide…

23.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the “construction turbo” means for municipalities and building supervisory authorities

The Bundestag has passed the “construction turbo” and local authorities can now significantly accelerate certain construction projects. According to the law passed on October 9,…

22.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law guest article in Das Inverstment: Private debt for the masses: How the FRBG is turning the fund market upside down

Paradigm shift in the fund market: The new FRBG makes private debt retail-capable and creates citizen participation funds. In this article, KPMG Law expert Ulrich

20.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Data centers: Requirements for emergency power generators continue to rise

When the power fails in data centers, the consequences are often severe: Data loss and system failures can cause considerable financial damage to companies. Emergency…

16.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law contribution to the anthology “Crypto-Asset Compliance”

KPMG Law experts Ulrich Keunecke and Marc Pussar have contributed chapter 3 on capital market and banking supervisory law aspects of crypto-assets to the anthology…

14.10.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise Bühler Motor GmbH on the sale of Bühler Motor Aviation GmbH to Astronics Germany GmbH

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) have advised Bühler Motor GmbH on the sale of all shares in Bühler Motor Aviation…

10.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law guest article in NZG: Compliance due diligence in SMEs: Minimum scope and contractual mapping of compliance risks of the target company

In the context of M&A transactions, compliance usually still plays a subordinate role in legal due diligence. The purpose of this article is, on…

10.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law honored at the M&A Award Night 2025

KPMG Law has been awarded the “M&A Transaction Advisory” prize at this year’s M&A Award Night of the Bundesverband Mergers & Acquisitions e.V. (BM&A) and…

10.10.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law guest article in CCZ: The guide for compliance management systems in small and medium-sized enterprises (DIN SPEC 91524)

Compliance in SMEs is challenging: the legal responsibility for compliance is undisputed, but the specific tasks are unclear and depend on the specific situation of…

10.10.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Transformation in legal departments in 2026 – the most important trends and best practices

Three topics in particular are currently driving the transformation of the legal department: AI, the rapid increase in regulation and geopolitical developments. There has always…

Contact

Dr. Heiko Hoffmann

Partner
Munich Site Manager
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 59976061652
HHoffmann@kpmg-law.com

Arndt Rodatz

Partner
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994 5081
arodatz@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll