Search
Contact
14.10.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Tax dispute – Six percent interest on taxes is unconstitutional

Six percent interest on taxes is unconstitutional

Long criticized, now declared unconstitutional: In a decision published on August 18, 2021, the German Federal Constitutional Court declares interest on back taxes and tax refunds at an annual rate of 6% unconstitutional from 2014.

For some time now, taxpayers have been unable to understand the amount of interest that the tax office charges for back taxes.
In a decision published on August 18, 2021, the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) basically confirmed this legal perception and declared the interest on back taxes at 6% per year for interest periods from January 1, 2014 to be unconstitutional.

In order to achieve the goal of full interest, namely to compensate for the fact that taxes are assessed and due at different times for individual taxpayers, interest at a rate of 0.5% per month is no longer justified in the opinion of the BVerfG since 2014. In this regard, the BVerfG makes it very clear that the interest rate of 6% per year has been evidently unrealistic since 2014 at the latest. For interest periods prior to 2014, however, this interest rate roughly corresponded to the relevant conditions on the money and capital markets according to the decision and was therefore not unconstitutional for these periods.

The incompatibility of interest pursuant to § 233a AO with the Basic Law includes not only back taxes but also interest on refunds in favor of taxpayers.

For taxpayers affected by this decision, however, it should be noted that the BVerfG has also stated that the previous law will continue to apply to interest periods from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018. Only for interest periods falling in 2019 are the provisions inapplicable.

The legislature is now required to enact new legislation by July 31, 2022, which will apply retroactively to all interest periods beginning in 2019 and cover all sovereign acts that have not yet become final.

Explore #more

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

On November 13, 2025, the EU Parliament voted on its negotiating position regarding the so-called omnibus package, which provides for a relaxation of the CSRD,…

12.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in In-house Counsel: More stability under the umbrella of corporate governance

There is a lot of talk about “corporate governance” in the face of multiple crises and regulatory tendencies on the part of legislators. But what…

07.11.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group. KPMG Law provided legal…

07.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Changes to the H-1B visa and their consequences for US hiring and secondment practices

President Trump’s administration has introduced two significant changes to the highly popular H-1B visa program for skilled workers: The previous random lottery will be replaced…

07.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement on HAUFE: Confusion surrounding the EU Deforestation Regulation – and what companies should do now

Possibly, perhaps, under certain circumstances, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) will not be binding for large and medium-sized enterprises on December 30, 2025 and for…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

External personnel: authorities tighten checks with AI support

AI is a blessing for many companies, but it can also quickly become a curse, especially when authorities use the technology to uncover legal violations…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Deforestation regulation – simplification instead of postponement?

In September, the EU Commission wanted to postpone the EUDR deforestation regulation. On October 21, 2025, it published a comprehensive proposal to simplify the EUDR

05.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Employer of Record now not subject to authorization after all – change of heart at BA

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Employment Agency (BA) updated its technical directives and made a U-turn with regard to the so-called employer-of-record model: In…

03.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

CO₂ contracts for difference: Participation in the preliminary procedure is a prerequisite for funding

Companies can apply for funding in the preliminary procedure for the climate protection contracts program until 1 December 2025. The funding from the Federal Ministry…

Contact

Dr. Heiko Hoffmann

Partner
Munich Site Manager
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 59976061652
HHoffmann@kpmg-law.com

Arndt Rodatz

Partner
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994 5081
arodatz@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll