Search
Contact
03.06.2019 | KPMG Law Insights

Subsequent declarations during an ongoing external audit – Important amendment to the AStBV

Subsequent declarations during an ongoing external audit – Important change to the AStBV

Tightening of the administrative instruction on the treatment of subsequent declarations during an ongoing external audit

I. Background
As soon as a taxpayer realizes before the expiry of the assessment period that a tax return submitted by him or on his behalf is incorrect, he must immediately notify the tax office and correct it (Section 153 (1) sentence 1 AO). This obligation exists irrespective of whether an external audit has already been ordered for the tax period in question or whether it has even already begun. A notification is only dispensable for the specific audit period insofar as the tax audit has already determined the error in question (AEAO to § 153 AO, No. 3 sentence 5). As part of preventive counseling, the aim is regularly to ensure that a mandatory correction report also fulfills the requirements of a self-disclosure that exempts from penalties or fines (Section 371 of the German Fiscal Code (AO)) as a precautionary measure (as a so-called self-disclosure correction). However, an exempting voluntary disclosure is no longer effectively possible for taxation periods and tax types for which an audit order has already been announced. A voluntary disclosure exempting from fines pursuant to Sec. 378 para. 3 AO is still permissible in these cases, however.

II. Previous situation of instructions of the tax authorities
The treatment of such notifications is mainly regulated within the tax authorities by the Application Decree on Section 153 of the German Fiscal Code (AO) and the Instructions for Criminal and Penalty Proceedings (Tax) (AStBV). Accordingly, voluntary disclosures (even if they are not designated as such but are at least recognizable) are and were always to be forwarded to the Office for Fines and Criminal Matters (BuStra) for examination. In addition, such declarations must also be forwarded to the BuStra where there are indications that taxes have previously been intentionally or recklessly evaded. There is no obligation to submit declarations to the BuStra if they are undoubtedly based on subsequent knowledge of the taxpayer (no. 132, para. 1 AStBV). De facto, this resulted in a very considerable scope of judgment for the assessment officer when dealing with notices of correction.

III. Change due to the AStBV 2019
Effective January 1, 2019, the current 2019 AStBV went into effect.
This massively restricts the tax offices’ scope for assessment when dealing with subsequent declarations. Specifically, the tax offices are now instructed to submit all subsequent declarations (regardless of their designation or material content) that are submitted in the course of an ongoing external audit to the BuStra for examination (No. 131 (1) sentence 2 AStBV ). In our opinion, it can be assumed that this instruction will be interpreted comprehensively by the assessment officials and that, in the case of ongoing external audits, subsequent declarations for periods not (yet) covered by this audit will also be submitted directly to the BuStra.

IV. Recommendation for action
The tightened audit procedures outlined above can prove extremely treacherous in correction and post-declaration cases. In the future, the BuStra will receive significantly more cases of supplementary declarations for review than before. This applies in particular to cases in which it is no longer possible to make an exempting voluntary disclosure due to the blocking effect caused by the external audit. It is obvious that this also increases the risk of prosecution. If the specialists in the form of the BuStra are always brought on board in correction cases on the part of the tax office, it is advisable from the company’s point of view to also involve specialized lawyers and tax consultants at an early stage, in particular also with regard to a defense under criminal tax law that may subsequently be necessary. Together with our tax experts at KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, we will be happy to assist you.

Please feel free to contact us with any questions you may have on these topics.

Explore #more

05.11.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Security Clearance Checks Under the SÜG—Practical Implementation and Common Mistakes

Before employees are granted access to sensitive information or perform security-sensitive tasks as part of an assignment, their reliability must be verified through a special…

04.11.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

EUDR: These obligations apply throughout the supply chain – as of 2026

After being postponed twice, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) is expected to take effect on December 30, 2026. Companies that handle certain products derived…

04.11.2026 | In the media

JUVE: Risks Associated with the Use of AI at the Highest Levels

AI can assist executive boards, supervisory boards, and managing directors in making decisions. However, unverified results can create liability risks. Fraport General Counsel Thomas Stoll…

30.10.2026 | In the media

New Podcast in the Packaging Journal: PWR in Practice—Who Is Liable, Who Pays, and What Are the Current Rules?

The core obligations of the PPWR have been in effect since August 12, 2026. In the Packaging People podcast, Dr. Simon Meyer of KPMG Law…

29.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG and KPMG Law Article in *Betriebs-Berater*: Pitfalls in Customs Law

In light of geopolitical changes, new trade barriers, and more rigorous audits, customs and foreign trade law are increasingly becoming a focus for companies. The…

27.10.2026 | In the media

Op-Ed in Versicherungsmonitor: The Environment Is Finally Becoming a Compliance Risk

With the implementation of the new EU Environmental Criminal Law Directive, the environment is becoming a core area of managerial liability. Managers face reputational damage,…

27.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Federal Court of Justice on the Summary Report: Tax-Exempt but Still a Criminal Offense

Can someone be punished for sales tax evasion even if the sales were subsequently deemed tax-exempt? Yes, says the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) in…

23.10.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

PHP2Shell may trigger legal obligations for companies

Two critical vulnerabilities in the PHP programming language are threatening web applications and digital products worldwide. The Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) has warned…

20.10.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest Column in it daily: The Business Judgment Rule and the Use of AI

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence presents corporate leadership with diverse and far-reaching decisions. These decisions concern not only the selection and deployment of appropriate…

19.10.2026 | In the media

New articles have been published in PERSONALFÜHRUNG

The current issue of PERSONALFÜHRUNG (10–11/2026) features two articles by female experts from KPMG and KPMG Law. In the article “Will AI Save the Day?…

Contact

Dr. Heiko Hoffmann

Partner
Munich site manager
Head of criminal tax law

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 59976061652
HHoffmann@kpmg-law.com

Arndt Rodatz

Partner
Head of criminal tax law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994 5081
arodatz@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll