Search
Contact
Microfon with a purple background
16.03.2023 | KPMG Law Insights, Podcasts

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: Data protection after Schrems II – Companies under pressure to act

In 2013, a 25-year-old Austrian filed a lawsuit in an Irish court against a leading social media provider. The accusation was that the platform had forwarded his data to the parent company in the USA. The Irish court referred the case to the ECJ and the Austrian data protection activist named Maximilian Schrems got justice. The highest European court overturned the EU-US Privacy Shield and thus stopped the previous practice of transferring data to the USA. Data transfers to countries outside the EU are only permitted if a level of data protection comparable to the GDPR is guaranteed, the ECJ ruled. The EU Commission subsequently revised the standard contractual clauses for the transfer of personal data to third countries. Companies had until December 27, 2022 to adapt their contracts to the new clauses.

 

The data protection authorities ask

Not all companies are aware that they are transferring data to third countries because they are not always aware of where their service providers are storing and processing the data. But right now, the authorities are approaching the companies and asking. Those who are not yet using the new formulations should therefore hurry.

Leonie Schönhagen, attorney and manager at KPMG Law, and Dr. Daniel Taraz, attorney and senior manager at KPMG Law, talk in the podcast about what to do now, when to expect fines and in which cases exceptions apply.

 

The core topics of the podcast are:

  • From minute 1:48: What is behind “Schrems II”?
  • From minute 3:33: Have the majority of companies already adopted the EU Commission’s new contract clauses and what were or are the challenges?
  • From minute 5:23: What are the consequences of missing the transposition deadline?
  • From minute 6:27: Why the authorities are asking questions now and what they want to know from companies.
  • From minute 8:00: What is behind the abbreviation TIA?
  • From minute 8:56: What can companies do if the data protection risks in a country are unmanageable?
  • From minute 9:28: What should companies do now that have missed the implementation deadline?
  • From minute 11:20: Not all third countries are created equal – countries with adequacy decision
  • From minute 12:29: What is the impact of the U.S. “Executive Order”?

All “KPMG Law on air” episodes can be found here.

Explore #more

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

On November 13, 2025, the EU Parliament voted on its negotiating position regarding the so-called omnibus package, which provides for a relaxation of the CSRD,…

12.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in In-house Counsel: More stability under the umbrella of corporate governance

There is a lot of talk about “corporate governance” in the face of multiple crises and regulatory tendencies on the part of legislators. But what…

07.11.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group. KPMG Law provided legal…

07.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Changes to the H-1B visa and their consequences for US hiring and secondment practices

President Trump’s administration has introduced two significant changes to the highly popular H-1B visa program for skilled workers: The previous random lottery will be replaced…

07.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement on HAUFE: Confusion surrounding the EU Deforestation Regulation – and what companies should do now

Possibly, perhaps, under certain circumstances, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) will not be binding for large and medium-sized enterprises on December 30, 2025 and for…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

External personnel: authorities tighten checks with AI support

AI is a blessing for many companies, but it can also quickly become a curse, especially when authorities use the technology to uncover legal violations…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Deforestation regulation – simplification instead of postponement?

In September, the EU Commission wanted to postpone the EUDR deforestation regulation. On October 21, 2025, it published a comprehensive proposal to simplify the EUDR

05.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Employer of Record now not subject to authorization after all – change of heart at BA

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Employment Agency (BA) updated its technical directives and made a U-turn with regard to the so-called employer-of-record model: In…

03.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

CO₂ contracts for difference: Participation in the preliminary procedure is a prerequisite for funding

Companies can apply for funding in the preliminary procedure for the climate protection contracts program until 1 December 2025. The funding from the Federal Ministry…

Contact

Leonie Troost-Schoenhagen

Senior Manager

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +4969951195923
lschoenhagen@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Daniel Taraz

Senior Manager

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994-5483
danieltaraz@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll