Search
Contact
30.07.2020 | KPMG Law Insights

Municipal right of first refusal according to the draft of the building land mobilization law

The Federal Ministry of the Interior, for Construction and Home Affairs has presented a draft bill for the Act on the Mobilization of Building Land (Building Land Mobilization Act). This law aims to support municipalities in activating building land. This is intended to promote the creation of affordable housing. To achieve this goal, for example, a new type of development plan for social housing will be created. Furthermore, the possibilities for exemption from the provisions of the development plan for the creation of living space are to be expanded and the upper limits for provisions on the extent of building use that have applied to date are in future to be designed only as orientation values.

In addition, however, the draft bill also contains changes in the area of municipal rights of first refusal that may affect the conclusion and implementation of real estate transactions. In fact, the bill clarifies that meeting housing needs and internal community development are community benefit reasons. This will make it easier in future for municipalities to exercise their right of first refusal on the grounds of the general interest. The draft bill also contains additional preemptive rights for municipalities, e.g. in the case of undeveloped and fallow land in municipalities with a tight housing market and in the case of urban blight. According to the draft bill, this fact would be fulfilled, for example, if a property is not used appropriately or if the property located on the property does not meet urban development or housing policy objectives. In addition, all pre-emptive rights are to be exercisable within an exercise period of three months instead of the previous two months.

The draft bill expands the scope for action by municipalities to procure affordable housing. These new opportunities for action, meanwhile, will also affect the way transactions are processed. It is to be expected that municipalities will examine the exercise of the right of first refusal in greater detail and exhaust the extended exercise period. As a result, for example, the negative certificate to be issued by the municipality on the non-exercise of pre-emptive rights, which is regularly agreed as a prerequisite for the due date of the purchase price in land purchase agreements, could only be issued at the end of the exercise period. This may lead to a postponement of the purchase price due date and thus to delays in the closing of the transaction. Moreover, it may be a reason to think about carrying out a real estate transaction by way of acquiring shares in a property company (share deal).

We will, of course, keep you informed about the development of the draft bill. In the meantime, we will be happy to answer any questions you may have.

Explore #more

21.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

The Digital Services Act – what does it mean for companies?

The Digital Services Act (DSA) is a key component of the EU’s digital strategy and came into force on November 16, 2022. As a regulation,…

15.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Data compliance management: How to implement it in practice

Part 3 of the article series “Professional tips for data compliance management”   The third part of this series of articles deals with data compliance

14.02.2024 | PR Publications

Guest article in ZURe: Monitoring the implementation of the LkSG

The current issue of ZURe (p. 20 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Law Partner Thomas Uhlig (Head of General Business and Commercial Law),…

14.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

The AI Act is coming: EU wants to get a grip on AI risks

For many people, artificial intelligence (AI) is the great hope for business, healthcare and science. But there are also plenty of critics who fear the…

09.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: The employment law function

In almost all German companies, the employment law function is located in the HR department and not in the legal department. One of the reasons…

02.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

CSDDD: Provisional agreement on the EU Supply Chain Directive

On December 14, 2023, the Council and the European Parliament reached a provisional political agreement on the EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). This…

01.02.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Podcast series “KPMG Law on air”: Fair play in eSports

eSports is a billion-dollar market that is growing rapidly. This makes it all the more important for the economic players involved to comply with applicable…

24.01.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

How the new unitary patent works – ten facts

The new unitary patent can be applied for at the European Patent Office (EPO) from June 1, 2023. The Implementing Regulations and the Schedule of

22.01.2024 | PR Publications

Guest article in the Börsen-Zeitung on the subject of EU antitrust regulations

Agreements with competitors on sustainability efforts may violate antitrust law. Which legal interest should then take precedence? KPMG Law expert Jonas Brueckner discusses this question…

18.01.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

AI and copyright – what is permitted when using LLMs?

A few months ago, new players entered the legal scene and have since caused numerous legal discussions: Large Language Models (LLM), better known as…

Contact

Human Aghel

Manager

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

tel: +49 40 3609945451
haghel@kpmg-law.com

Falk Mathews

Senior Manager

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

tel: +49 40 3609945014
fmathews@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll