Search
Contact
19.06.2017 | KPMG Law Insights

Investment law – Investment | Law | Compact – Issue 6/2017

Dear Readers,

For capital management companies, there is also a lot to do over the summer months:
The investment tax reform requires the adjustment of fund documentation by the end of the year. In addition to coordinating future regulations with special fund investors, the investment conditions for mutual funds must be amended, approved by BaFin and the sales prospectus adapted.

At the beginning of June, ESMA published its guidelines on product governance. In particular, they address issues relating to the determination of a target market for investment products, including the much-discussed question of what requirements should be placed on the target market in the context of financial portfolio management.

ESMA has also launched a consultation on the European MMF Regulation. This contains proposals for technical standards and guidelines.

With warm regards
Henning Brockhaus

National legislation

Adjustment of fund documentation due to investment tax reform

There are approximately six months until the new investment tax law will be applied on January 1, 2018. Until then, all investment terms and conditions of mutual and special funds must in principle be adapted to the new regulations and – where applicable – coordinated with investors and asset managers and/or fund initiators. In addition, the sales prospectuses of the mutual funds must be amended.

The extensive change measures require increased resources. We will be happy to assist you with your fund documentation customization projects. Our experts will take care of the necessary work for you, right up to complete project execution.

European supervision

ESMA presents guidelines on product governance

ESMA issued its final guidelines on certain new requirements under product governance on June 2, 2017. The guidelines deal in particular with guidance on determining a target market for investment products or how to deal with it.

According to ESMA, five instead of six criteria are now relevant for the target market for product manufacturers. The criteria “Clients’ Objectives” and “Clients’ Needs” were combined.

As already noted here, as non-securities companies, capital management companies are not obliged to determine target markets for the investment assets they manage. Nevertheless, they will not be able to avoid providing their sales partners with appropriate information so that they, in turn, can determine a target market. ESMA also addresses this interaction in the guidelines and considers it possible for product manufacturers and distributors to act together to identify target markets. With regard to fund distribution, this is unlikely to be accomplished in any other way, since the capital management company can assess its funds better than the distribution partner, but the latter in return knows its customers and their needs – which the capital management company can only do on a theoretical and general basis.

With regard to communication between distributors and product manufacturers, ESMA considers it good practice for capital management companies to receive reports on the distribution of their funds (such as whether it is in line with the target market). Sales outside the target market do not need to be reported to the product manufacturer if the customer has purchased a product for hedging or diversification purposes only.

ESMA also clarifies that portfolio management for the target market does not require a look-through to individual financial instruments as long as the portfolio as a whole is suitable for the client (para. 52ff. of the Guidelines). However, the question arises here whether these explanations do not describe the situation at the point of sale (i.e., the subsequent suitability test) rather than the prior target market determination for the customer.

You can find the guidelines here.

European supervision

ESMA updates Q&A catalog on MiFID2

In addition to the publication of the guidelines on product governance, ESMA published an updated version of its question and answer (Q&A) guide on investor protection topics on June 6, 2017.

In the now 67-page paper, additions have been made to the sections “Post-sale reporting”, “Information on costs and charges” and “Appropriateness / Complex Financial Instruments”.

ESMA has, for example, dealt with the handling of cost representations for PRIIPs or with the methodology envisaged for PRIIPs in this regard. In the new questions and answers 13 and 14 on cost transparency (in particular ex-ante), ESMA also provides guidance on the presentation of aggregate costs as well as itemization, and provides guidance on any cost estimation.

The revised Q&A can be found here.

European supervision

ESMA launches consultation on money market fund regulation

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published a comprehensive consultation paper (“Draft technical advice, implementing technical standards and guidelines under the MMF Regulation”) on the European MMF Regulation on May 24, 2017.

In it, ESMA proposes various delegated acts and considers different options for the quantitative and qualitative liquidity and credit quality requirements of other assets that MMFs may accept in reverse repurchase agreements. In addition, ESMA consults on proposals for assessing the credit quality of money market instruments.

ESMA also regulates the reporting of detailed information on MMFs to supervisors and provides draft guidelines on the conduct of stress tests for MMFs.

The consultation period runs until August 7, 2017. You can find the consultation paper here.

European supervision

ESMA updates Q&A catalog on AIFM Directive

On May 24, 2017, ESMA published its updated Q&A on the AIFM Directive. The following topics are new:

  • In AIFM reporting, information must be provided on the ratio of the split between private and professional investors in AIFs. If this information is not available, this fact must also be stated.
  • In the case of cross-border management of AIFs, the business plan shall indicate the name and any national identification number of the AIF. If this is not yet possible at the time of filing the notification, information on the investment strategy should be provided in accordance with the classification in the AIFM reporting.

You can find the Q&A here.

Explore #more

25.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Special infrastructure assets: how the administration manages to implement projects quickly

The special infrastructure fund creates the opportunity to catch up on years of investment backlog. There is a need for urgency. Defence capability, economic growth…

21.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in Real Estate I Haufe: Substitute building materials: “Secondary is not second class”

The Substitute Building Materials Ordinance is intended to harmonize the circular economy in construction, but legal uncertainty and bureaucracy are holding it back. How can…

21.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Residential construction turbo: more living space on existing properties

Since October 30, 2025, new regulations on the creation of living space have been in force in the German Building Code (BauGB). At the heart…

19.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

New Packaging Implementation Act tightens obligations for companies

With a new Packaging Implementation Act (VerpackDG), German law is to be adapted to the EU Packaging Regulation. The Federal Ministry for the Environment…

18.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in the FAZ on the subject of deepfakes

Fraudsters can easily falsify invoices or even act as company bosses. Companies can defend themselves against this, but there are no miracle weapons against AI…

17.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Video surveillance in rental properties: What should landlords be aware of?

Video surveillance of rented properties is only possible under strict legal conditions. More and more owners want to keep an eye on and secure their…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

On November 13, 2025, the EU Parliament voted on its negotiating position regarding the so-called omnibus package, which provides for a relaxation of the CSRD,…

12.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in In-house Counsel: More stability under the umbrella of corporate governance

There is a lot of talk about “corporate governance” in the face of multiple crises and regulatory tendencies on the part of legislators. But what…

07.11.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group. KPMG Law provided legal…

Contact

Henning Brockhaus

Partner

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49 69 951195061
hbrockhaus@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll