Search
Contact
17.11.2017 | KPMG Law Insights

Investment | Law | Compact – Issue 11/2017

Dear Readers,

the recently published new WpDVerOV closes a gap of still open questions in the context of the implementation of MiFID2 into national law. We have compiled the most important adjustments compared to the draft regulation from May 2017.

Meanwhile, ESMA is continuously adding to its now numerous and in some cases extensive question and answer catalogs on European regulations. In this regard, BaFin stated at a MiFID2 conference at the end of October that it would also take ESMA’s comments in the Q&A catalogs into account in its national supervisory and administrative practice.

Finally, we report on another investor protection initiative of the EU Commission: It has commissioned ESMA to investigate and report on the effect of costs on the performance of investment products.

With warm regards

Henning Brockhaus

National legislation

New WpDVerOV published

The final version of the Securities Services Conduct and Organization Ordinance (WpDVerOV) was published in the Federal Law Gazette on October 23, 2017 (WpDVerOV of October 17, 2017, Federal Law Gazette I 2017, No. 69, p. 3566 et seq.).

In addition to editorial adjustments, the content of this version largely corresponds to the version of the BMF’s draft bill (RefE) of May 9, 2017, which we already reported on in our May issue.

The main adjustments include:

  • § Section 2 WpDVerOV (“Customers”) contains a new paragraph 4, which corresponds to Section 13 of the RefE.
  • In § 4 WpDVerOV (“Information Sheets”), para. 1 sentence 2 the No. 4 of the RefE: “the target market”.
  • § Section 6 WpDVerOV (“Benefits”) contains only a few linguistic adjustments compared to the RefE. With regard to the requirements for quality improvement for the customer in commission-based sales, it has remained with the additional example of “provision of a widespread branch advisor network” not provided for in the Delegated Directive of the EU Commission of April 7, 2016 (see Section 6 (2) sentence 1 no. 1 lit. d) WpDVerOV).
  • § Section 9 WpDVerOV (“Recording and Retention Obligations”) has been amended compared to the RefE to the effect that two new paragraphs 3 and 4 have been inserted and the content of the previous paragraph 3 has been omitted (according to which in future it should have been recorded, among other things, whether an order was based on investment advice or an appropriateness test or whether it was a pure execution transaction).

You can access the published document of the WpDVerOV as a reading text here.

National supervision

BaFin plans revision of MaComp

BaFin intends to amend the Circular for Minimum Requirements for Compliance Functions and the Other Conduct, Organization and Transparency Obligations Pursuant to Sections 31 et seq. Wertpapierhandelsgesetz (WpHG – German Securities Trading Act) for securities services companies (MaComp) due to the changes brought about by MiFID2.

Planned amendments to MaComp that go beyond mere adjustments to the new legal situation and are not based on ESMA guidelines that have already been consulted on have now been put out for consultation by the supervisory authority. In addition to the general requirements for branches and the monitoring of personal transactions, this concerns new modules on the topics of suitability declarations, graduated commissions, benefits and complaint handling.

The consultation period ends on November 30, 2017. The consultation paper can be found here.

European supervision

ESMA updates Q&A on benchmark regulation

On November 8, 2017, ESMA updated the question and answer (Q&A) catalog on the Benchmark Regulation.

The newly included topics address the issue of the applicability of the Regulation to non-European benchmarks. ESMA clarifies that what matters for the application of the Benchmark Regulation is whether the non-European benchmark is actually used within the EU.

In addition, ESMA comments on the interpretation of the term “already used” in Article 51 para. 5 of the Regulation.

You can find the Q&A on the benchmark regulation here.

European supervision

ESMA updates investor protection Q&A on MiFID2

On November 10, 2017, ESMA updated the question and answer (Q&A) catalog on the investor protection provisions of MiFID2.

The newly included questions and answers address recordkeeping requirements, loss threshold reporting, and grants.

The updated Q&A on MiFID2 investor protection topics can be found here.

National supervision

BaFin conference on MiFID2 conduct of business rules

On October 27, 2017, the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority hosted a full-day conference with individual presentations on the key investor protection provisions of MiFID2.

BaFin took this opportunity to point out that ESMA’s question and answer catalogs were important for uniform European supervisory practice and that BaFin would take them into account in its supervisory practice.

On the subject of gratuities, the supervisor clarified that the retention of parts of gratuities as profit of the investment services company is no longer possible. The grants must be used in total to improve quality for the respective customer. However, BaFin would not currently provide any further information on the appropriate ratio of the allowance to the additional or higher-value service, but would examine whether the regulations had been implemented appropriately once they had been implemented.

The presentation materials used in the presentations are available here.

European supervision

EU Commission mandates ESMA to review costs and performance of investment products

In the context of the EU Commission’s Capital Markets Union (CMU) initiative, on October 13, 2017, the EU Commission asked ESMA to take a closer look at the costs and performance of retail investment products and to report on corresponding findings.

It is explicitly stated that the upcoming implementation of the new MiFID2 and PRIIPs requirements provides a suitable framework for this study.

ESMA has announced that it will initially focus on costs and performance of UCITS, including the differences between active and passive investment strategies. ESMA’s first report is expected to be available in the second half of 2018.

You can find more information about it here.

ESMA had previously published an article on the impact of charges onmutual fund performance(The impact of charges on mutual fund returns), based on a previous study.

Explore #more

02.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementation of the Pay Transparency Directive: what the expert commission recommends

The EU Pay Transparency Directive has been in force since June 2023 and must now be transposed into German law. In the coalition agreement,…

28.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest article Expert forum on employment law: Between theory and practice: The EU Blue Card and the right to short-term mobility within the EU

Nowadays, not only employees but also employers want to create more attractive working conditions. For some time now, so-called workstations / work-from-anywhere programs or other…

26.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

EU deforestation regulation forces companies to act

Anyone who trades in or uses the raw materials soy, oil palm, cattle, coffee, cocoa, rubber and wood and certain products made from them should…

25.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Special infrastructure assets: how the administration manages to implement projects quickly

The special infrastructure fund creates the opportunity to catch up on years of investment backlog. There is a need for urgency. Defence capability, economic growth…

21.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in Real Estate I Haufe: Substitute building materials: “Secondary is not second class”

The Substitute Building Materials Ordinance is intended to harmonize the circular economy in construction, but legal uncertainty and bureaucracy are holding it back. How can…

21.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Residential construction turbo: more living space on existing properties

Since October 30, 2025, new regulations on the creation of living space have been in force in the German Building Code (BauGB). At the heart…

19.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

New Packaging Implementation Act tightens obligations for companies

With a new Packaging Implementation Act (VerpackDG), German law is to be adapted to the EU Packaging Regulation. The Federal Ministry for the Environment…

18.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in the FAZ on the subject of deepfakes

Fraudsters can easily falsify invoices or even act as company bosses. Companies can defend themselves against this, but there are no miracle weapons against AI…

17.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Video surveillance in rental properties: What should landlords be aware of?

Video surveillance of rented properties is only possible under strict legal conditions. More and more owners want to keep an eye on and secure their…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

Contact

Henning Brockhaus

Partner

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49 69 951195061
hbrockhaus@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll