Search
Contact
NIS2: Hand von nicht erkennbarer Person tippt auf Tablet
18.11.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing NIS 2: How companies must protect themselves against cyberattacks

The EU’s NIS 2 Directive is intended to ensure greater cyber security for essential infrastructures and create a uniform and significantly higher level of protection in Europe. The member states were supposed to transpose it into national law by October 17, 2024. The German legislator has not yet fulfilled this obligation. However, a draft of the implementation law (NIS2UmsuCG) has been available since July 2024. The next government will also have to ensure that the directive is implemented. The directive prescribes certain risk management measures such as tests for major infrastructure companies and tightens reporting obligations.

NIS-2 expands the scope of obligated companies enormously

Cybersecurity measures were already mandatory in the past. However, the NIS 2 Directive significantly expands the group of companies affected. The critical sectors compared to the NIS Directive adopted in 2016 have been expanded by eleven sectors. In addition to operators of essential services, providers of digital services that were not previously covered by the regulations are now also affected. These include, for example, providers of cloud services, data centers and online marketplaces. Ultimately, almost any large company may fall within the scope of application in future. In addition, it is not always clear at first glance whether a company is affected. Particularly in group structures, the parent company may also be obliged due to shareholdings.

Companies must determine their own impact

The NIS-2 Directive and the NISUmsuCG are aimed at operators of critical infrastructure, particularly important facilities and important facilities. In the last two categories, the sector and criteria such as annual turnover and annual balance sheet total determine who is affected. Whether an institution is affected by NIS 2 or the NISUmsuCG must be determined by the institution itself. The Federal Office for Security and Information Technology (BSI) offers a NIS 2 impact assessment for initial orientation. In principle, companies can assess whether they are affected by NIS 2 in five steps:

NIS2 Impact assessment

How companies can increase their cyber security

A number of laws are to be amended in Germany to implement the directive. Most of the changes concern the Act on the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI Act – BSIG). In particular, stricter cyber security requirements are planned. Companies will have to take not only technical but also organizational measures to ensure the protection of their IT infrastructure. In particular, these additional obligations will be imposed on the companies concerned:

  • Risk management measures

The Implementation Act defines a number of risk management measures. These include concepts for risk analyses, backups, tests, encryption and training.

  • Reporting obligations

Particularly important facilities and important facilities must report security incidents to a reporting office.

  • Obligation to register

The companies concerned must register as such independently.

  • Duty to inform

In the event of security incidents, affected companies must inform other organizations affected by the incident.

  • Monitoring by management

Members of the Executive Board are personally obliged to monitor the implementation of risk management measures.

Additional verification obligations apply to operators of critical infrastructures.

The management is personally liable

If affected facilities do not meet the requirements, they could face fines of up to 10 million euros or 2 percent of their global annual turnover. The personal liability of the management is particularly controversial. The liability standard of the current draft of the German Implementation Act corresponds to the requirements of the NIS-2 Directive. Management boards are already liable if they violate their duties to ensure IT security without due care and this results in damage. NIS 2 significantly increases the de facto liability risk for management boards: management bodies must approve the risk management measures taken in the area of cyber security and monitor their implementation. They can be held liable for violations. The current government draft of the NIS2UmsuCG may even increase the responsibility of management boards in terms of wording by requiring them to implement the risk management measures in addition to monitoring them.

How companies should prepare

Affected companies should deal with NIS 2 even before an implementation law comes into force and take appropriate and proportionate measures based on comprehensible risk management. All measures should be based on a holistic and threat-oriented management approach that aims to prevent security incidents or minimize their impact. We recommend the following steps:

 

  • First of all, all companies should carry out an impact analysis.
  • If it is affected, the next step is a readiness assessment. Companies should check how the company is positioned in terms of IT security and what measures are still necessary in relation to NIS 2.
  • From this analysis, it then derives the measures that are still necessary and implements them.
  • Companies should set up NIS 2 governance to ensure that all measures are in place.
  • Companies should train their management and employees, particularly in the areas of law, data protection, audit / revision, cyber security and technology.
  • Finally, a process should be set up for mandatory reporting to the supervisory authority.
  • The entire implementation should be subject to regular monitoring.

Explore #more

19.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI: how governing bodies are liable for decisions

If an AI provides the basis for business decisions, the people responsible are liable, not the machine. This makes the use of artificial intelligence risky…

16.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

KPIs in the legal department: How legal becomes strategically effective through control, transparency and data analysis

Today, legal departments are facing a strategic turning point: they must reliably hedge risks, but at the same time enable speed, control costs and make…

13.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial courts: when they are worthwhile for companies – and when they are not

Large commercial disputes are given courts specially tailored to their needs: the Commercial Courts. The German legislator introduced it with the Act to Strengthen the

10.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Krasemann Hausverwaltung to Buena

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the KRASEMANN family on the sale of KRASEMANN Immobilien- & Gebäudeservice GmbH (KIGS) and KRASEMANN…

09.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR and whitepaper obligations – what the transitional regulations mean

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) has been in force for just over a year. Among other things, MiCAR obliges issuers and providers of crypto…

09.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Private Banking Magazine: What tokenized banknotes mean in day-to-day treasury operations

The future of payment transactions will be shaped not by new currencies, but by new processing models. A practical report by Marc Pussar (KPMG Law),…

06.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in smartlegalmarket: Trends for legal departments in 2026 & 2027

KPMG Law has been surveying international legal departments on their challenges for more than ten years. The “Right to Progress” report is now regarded as…

06.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Carve-out: The biggest risks and how the legal workstream avoids them

A carve-out does not usually fail due to a lack of ideas. And not due to a lack of buyers. Nor do they usually fail…

04.03.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law expert with statement in dpn magazine on the Location Promotion Act

Shortly after coming into force, the Location Promotion Act is apparently already having a noticeable effect on the investment plans of institutional market participants. In…

25.02.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advised Senstar on the acquisition of Blickfeld

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Senstar group (Senstar) on the acquisition of all shares in Blickfeld GmbH (Blickfeld).…

Contact

Francois Heynike, LL.M. (Stellenbosch)

Partner
Head of Technology Law

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49-69-951195770
fheynike@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Daniel Taraz

Senior Manager

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994-5483
danieltaraz@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll