Search
Contact
NIS2: Hand von nicht erkennbarer Person tippt auf Tablet
18.11.2024 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing NIS 2: How companies must protect themselves against cyberattacks

The EU’s NIS 2 Directive is intended to ensure greater cyber security for essential infrastructures and create a uniform and significantly higher level of protection in Europe. The member states were supposed to transpose it into national law by October 17, 2024. The German legislator has not yet fulfilled this obligation. However, a draft of the implementation law (NIS2UmsuCG) has been available since July 2024. The next government will also have to ensure that the directive is implemented. The directive prescribes certain risk management measures such as tests for major infrastructure companies and tightens reporting obligations.

NIS-2 expands the scope of obligated companies enormously

Cybersecurity measures were already mandatory in the past. However, the NIS 2 Directive significantly expands the group of companies affected. The critical sectors compared to the NIS Directive adopted in 2016 have been expanded by eleven sectors. In addition to operators of essential services, providers of digital services that were not previously covered by the regulations are now also affected. These include, for example, providers of cloud services, data centers and online marketplaces. Ultimately, almost any large company may fall within the scope of application in future. In addition, it is not always clear at first glance whether a company is affected. Particularly in group structures, the parent company may also be obliged due to shareholdings.

Companies must determine their own impact

The NIS-2 Directive and the NISUmsuCG are aimed at operators of critical infrastructure, particularly important facilities and important facilities. In the last two categories, the sector and criteria such as annual turnover and annual balance sheet total determine who is affected. Whether an institution is affected by NIS 2 or the NISUmsuCG must be determined by the institution itself. The Federal Office for Security and Information Technology (BSI) offers a NIS 2 impact assessment for initial orientation. In principle, companies can assess whether they are affected by NIS 2 in five steps:

NIS2 Impact assessment

How companies can increase their cyber security

A number of laws are to be amended in Germany to implement the directive. Most of the changes concern the Act on the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI Act – BSIG). In particular, stricter cyber security requirements are planned. Companies will have to take not only technical but also organizational measures to ensure the protection of their IT infrastructure. In particular, these additional obligations will be imposed on the companies concerned:

  • Risk management measures

The Implementation Act defines a number of risk management measures. These include concepts for risk analyses, backups, tests, encryption and training.

  • Reporting obligations

Particularly important facilities and important facilities must report security incidents to a reporting office.

  • Obligation to register

The companies concerned must register as such independently.

  • Duty to inform

In the event of security incidents, affected companies must inform other organizations affected by the incident.

  • Monitoring by management

Members of the Executive Board are personally obliged to monitor the implementation of risk management measures.

Additional verification obligations apply to operators of critical infrastructures.

The management is personally liable

If affected facilities do not meet the requirements, they could face fines of up to 10 million euros or 2 percent of their global annual turnover. The personal liability of the management is particularly controversial. The liability standard of the current draft of the German Implementation Act corresponds to the requirements of the NIS-2 Directive. Management boards are already liable if they violate their duties to ensure IT security without due care and this results in damage. NIS 2 significantly increases the de facto liability risk for management boards: management bodies must approve the risk management measures taken in the area of cyber security and monitor their implementation. They can be held liable for violations. The current government draft of the NIS2UmsuCG may even increase the responsibility of management boards in terms of wording by requiring them to implement the risk management measures in addition to monitoring them.

How companies should prepare

Affected companies should deal with NIS 2 even before an implementation law comes into force and take appropriate and proportionate measures based on comprehensible risk management. All measures should be based on a holistic and threat-oriented management approach that aims to prevent security incidents or minimize their impact. We recommend the following steps:

 

  • First of all, all companies should carry out an impact analysis.
  • If it is affected, the next step is a readiness assessment. Companies should check how the company is positioned in terms of IT security and what measures are still necessary in relation to NIS 2.
  • From this analysis, it then derives the measures that are still necessary and implements them.
  • Companies should set up NIS 2 governance to ensure that all measures are in place.
  • Companies should train their management and employees, particularly in the areas of law, data protection, audit / revision, cyber security and technology.
  • Finally, a process should be set up for mandatory reporting to the supervisory authority.
  • The entire implementation should be subject to regular monitoring.

Explore #more

17.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Video surveillance in rental properties: What should landlords be aware of?

Video surveillance of rented properties is only possible under strict legal conditions. More and more owners want to keep an eye on and secure their…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

On November 13, 2025, the EU Parliament voted on its negotiating position regarding the so-called omnibus package, which provides for a relaxation of the CSRD,…

12.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in In-house Counsel: More stability under the umbrella of corporate governance

There is a lot of talk about “corporate governance” in the face of multiple crises and regulatory tendencies on the part of legislators. But what…

07.11.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group. KPMG Law provided legal…

07.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Changes to the H-1B visa and their consequences for US hiring and secondment practices

President Trump’s administration has introduced two significant changes to the highly popular H-1B visa program for skilled workers: The previous random lottery will be replaced…

07.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement on HAUFE: Confusion surrounding the EU Deforestation Regulation – and what companies should do now

Possibly, perhaps, under certain circumstances, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) will not be binding for large and medium-sized enterprises on December 30, 2025 and for…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

External personnel: authorities tighten checks with AI support

AI is a blessing for many companies, but it can also quickly become a curse, especially when authorities use the technology to uncover legal violations…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Deforestation regulation – simplification instead of postponement?

In September, the EU Commission wanted to postpone the EUDR deforestation regulation. On October 21, 2025, it published a comprehensive proposal to simplify the EUDR

05.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Employer of Record now not subject to authorization after all – change of heart at BA

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Employment Agency (BA) updated its technical directives and made a U-turn with regard to the so-called employer-of-record model: In…

Contact

Francois Heynike, LL.M. (Stellenbosch)

Partner
Head of Technology Law

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49-69-951195770
fheynike@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Daniel Taraz

Senior Manager

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994-5483
danieltaraz@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll