Search
Contact
15.04.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Data protection – fine of 475,000 euros for late notification of a data protection incident

Fine of 475,000 euros for late notification of a data protection incident

The Dutch data protection authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens – AP) has imposed a fine of 475,000 euros on the accommodation and travel agency platform booking.com for failing to report a data protection incident in good time.

Already in 2019, hackers had managed to access the data of 4109 customers of booking.com(https://edpb.europa.eu/news/national-news/2021/dutch-dpa-fines-bookingcom-delay-reporting-data-breach_en). The data included names, addresses, telephone numbers and details of hotel bookings, as well as credit card information for 283 data subjects, including security numbers in 97 cases. The hackers gained access to the data through employee accounts at several hotels in the United Arab Emirates, presumably through “socialengineering” techniques or phishing. In addition, the hackers attempted to gain access to additional credit card data by contacting guests of the hotels via email or phone. This posed a high security risk even for those booking.com customers whose credit card data was not affected.

booking.com did not consider itself responsible for the data protection incident, as the data had not been accessed via its own IT infrastructure. The AP, on the other hand, saw evidence of shared responsibility on the part of the operator. However, the fine was issued regardless of this issue solely based on the fact that booking.com had reported the data protection incident to the affected customers only after 22 days and to the supervisory authority only after 25 days. A data breach of this magnitude should have been reported to the data protection authority pursuant to Art.33 Para.1 GDPR must be reported to booking.com at the latest within 72 hours of becoming aware of it.

The fine can still be appealed. However, booking.com has already had it stated that it will accept the fine. The booking.com database had not been compromised at any point, but the company said it was working to improve its internal processes.

What is remarkable about this fine decision is that the actual incident was not sanctioned. Rather, only the late reporting was penalized. This proves that the supervisory authorities do not only examine and sanction measures to prevent data protection incidents. Delayed reporting of incidents to the supervisory authorities and/or the data subjects also constitutes a violation in its own right and one that is subject to sanctions.

Responsible parties are therefore well advised to review their internal processes for reporting data protection incidents and ensure that any required notification can be made in a timely manner. In particular, it must be taken into account that the 72-hour period is a maximum period and – at least according to the German supervisory authorities – also runs on weekends or public holidays. Against the background of the fact-finding usually required in the company, appropriate organizational precautions must be taken for this purpose.

Explore #more

19.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Judgement Rule in the use of AI: how governing bodies are liable for decisions

If an AI provides the basis for business decisions, the people responsible are liable, not the machine. This makes the use of artificial intelligence risky…

16.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

KPIs in the legal department: How legal becomes strategically effective through control, transparency and data analysis

Today, legal departments are facing a strategic turning point: they must reliably hedge risks, but at the same time enable speed, control costs and make…

13.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial courts: when they are worthwhile for companies – and when they are not

Large commercial disputes are given courts specially tailored to their needs: the Commercial Courts. The German legislator introduced it with the Act to Strengthen the

10.03.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises on the sale of Krasemann Hausverwaltung to Buena

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided legal advice to the KRASEMANN family on the sale of KRASEMANN Immobilien- & Gebäudeservice GmbH (KIGS) and KRASEMANN…

09.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

MiCAR and whitepaper obligations – what the transitional regulations mean

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) has been in force for just over a year. Among other things, MiCAR obliges issuers and providers of crypto…

09.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in Private Banking Magazine: What tokenized banknotes mean in day-to-day treasury operations

The future of payment transactions will be shaped not by new currencies, but by new processing models. A practical report by Marc Pussar (KPMG Law),…

06.03.2026 | In the media

Guest article in smartlegalmarket: Trends for legal departments in 2026 & 2027

KPMG Law has been surveying international legal departments on their challenges for more than ten years. The “Right to Progress” report is now regarded as…

06.03.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Carve-out: The biggest risks and how the legal workstream avoids them

A carve-out does not usually fail due to a lack of ideas. And not due to a lack of buyers. Nor do they usually fail…

04.03.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law expert with statement in dpn magazine on the Location Promotion Act

Shortly after coming into force, the Location Promotion Act is apparently already having a noticeable effect on the investment plans of institutional market participants. In…

25.02.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advised Senstar on the acquisition of Blickfeld

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Senstar group (Senstar) on the acquisition of all shares in Blickfeld GmbH (Blickfeld).…

Contact

Sebastian Hoegl, LL.M. (Wellington)

Senior Manager
Lawyer
Specialist lawyer for IT law
LL.M. (Wellington)

Heinrich-von-Stephan-Straße 23
79100 Freiburg im Breisgau

Tel.: +49 761 769999-20
shoegl@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll