Search
Contact
15.04.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Data protection – fine of 475,000 euros for late notification of a data protection incident

Fine of 475,000 euros for late notification of a data protection incident

The Dutch data protection authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens – AP) has imposed a fine of 475,000 euros on the accommodation and travel agency platform booking.com for failing to report a data protection incident in good time.

Already in 2019, hackers had managed to access the data of 4109 customers of booking.com(https://edpb.europa.eu/news/national-news/2021/dutch-dpa-fines-bookingcom-delay-reporting-data-breach_en). The data included names, addresses, telephone numbers and details of hotel bookings, as well as credit card information for 283 data subjects, including security numbers in 97 cases. The hackers gained access to the data through employee accounts at several hotels in the United Arab Emirates, presumably through “socialengineering” techniques or phishing. In addition, the hackers attempted to gain access to additional credit card data by contacting guests of the hotels via email or phone. This posed a high security risk even for those booking.com customers whose credit card data was not affected.

booking.com did not consider itself responsible for the data protection incident, as the data had not been accessed via its own IT infrastructure. The AP, on the other hand, saw evidence of shared responsibility on the part of the operator. However, the fine was issued regardless of this issue solely based on the fact that booking.com had reported the data protection incident to the affected customers only after 22 days and to the supervisory authority only after 25 days. A data breach of this magnitude should have been reported to the data protection authority pursuant to Art.33 Para.1 GDPR must be reported to booking.com at the latest within 72 hours of becoming aware of it.

The fine can still be appealed. However, booking.com has already had it stated that it will accept the fine. The booking.com database had not been compromised at any point, but the company said it was working to improve its internal processes.

What is remarkable about this fine decision is that the actual incident was not sanctioned. Rather, only the late reporting was penalized. This proves that the supervisory authorities do not only examine and sanction measures to prevent data protection incidents. Delayed reporting of incidents to the supervisory authorities and/or the data subjects also constitutes a violation in its own right and one that is subject to sanctions.

Responsible parties are therefore well advised to review their internal processes for reporting data protection incidents and ensure that any required notification can be made in a timely manner. In particular, it must be taken into account that the 72-hour period is a maximum period and – at least according to the German supervisory authorities – also runs on weekends or public holidays. Against the background of the fact-finding usually required in the company, appropriate organizational precautions must be taken for this purpose.

Explore #more

02.12.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementation of the Pay Transparency Directive: what the expert commission recommends

The EU Pay Transparency Directive has been in force since June 2023 and must now be transposed into German law. In the coalition agreement,…

28.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Guest article Expert forum on employment law: Between theory and practice: The EU Blue Card and the right to short-term mobility within the EU

Nowadays, not only employees but also employers want to create more attractive working conditions. For some time now, so-called workstations / work-from-anywhere programs or other…

26.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

EU deforestation regulation forces companies to act

Anyone who trades in or uses the raw materials soy, oil palm, cattle, coffee, cocoa, rubber and wood and certain products made from them should…

25.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Special infrastructure assets: how the administration manages to implement projects quickly

The special infrastructure fund creates the opportunity to catch up on years of investment backlog. There is a need for urgency. Defence capability, economic growth…

21.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in Real Estate I Haufe: Substitute building materials: “Secondary is not second class”

The Substitute Building Materials Ordinance is intended to harmonize the circular economy in construction, but legal uncertainty and bureaucracy are holding it back. How can…

21.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Residential construction turbo: more living space on existing properties

Since October 30, 2025, new regulations on the creation of living space have been in force in the German Building Code (BauGB). At the heart…

19.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

New Packaging Implementation Act tightens obligations for companies

With a new Packaging Implementation Act (VerpackDG), German law is to be adapted to the EU Packaging Regulation. The Federal Ministry for the Environment…

18.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in the FAZ on the subject of deepfakes

Fraudsters can easily falsify invoices or even act as company bosses. Companies can defend themselves against this, but there are no miracle weapons against AI…

17.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Video surveillance in rental properties: What should landlords be aware of?

Video surveillance of rented properties is only possible under strict legal conditions. More and more owners want to keep an eye on and secure their…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

Contact

Sebastian Hoegl, LL.M. (Wellington)

Senior Manager
Lawyer
Specialist lawyer for IT law
LL.M. (Wellington)

Heinrich-von-Stephan-Straße 23
79100 Freiburg im Breisgau

Tel.: +49 761 769999-20
shoegl@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll