08.05.2019 | KPMG Law Insights

Company pension plan – elimination of surviving dependents’ benefits due to superseding collective agreement provision

Cessation of surviving dependents’ benefits due to superseding collective bargaining agreement (BAG ruling dated July 31, 2018, 3 AZR 731/16)

By Christine Hansen and Jean-Baptiste Abel

In the present case, the employee had been receiving a retirement pension since June 2001 – at the age of 63. The pension scheme applicable at the time of retirement provided for an exclusion of the widow’s pension in the event that the marriage was entered into after the insured event and the employee had reached the age of 65 at the time of the marriage. The pension scheme was later replaced – with explicit reference to active or former employees who had acquired entitlements under a different pension scheme – by a new provision in the collective agreement, according to which the granting of a widow’s pension requires, among other things, that the marriage took place before the insured event occurred. The employee, who married after the pensionable event and before reaching the age of 65, seeks a declaration that his widow is entitled to payment of a widow’s pension.

The BAG ruled that the entitlement to a widow’s pension was not eliminated by the new regulation of the pension scheme. Since a different pension scheme was still in force at the time of the marriage, it would be contrary to the principles of protection of legitimate expectations and proportionality if the spouses’ coverage were to cease completely retroactively. The parties to the collective bargaining agreement are also bound by this. Deteriorating interventions in pension entitlements through collective bargaining regulations would require special legitimizing reasons. The complete cancellation without replacement of a promised survivor’s pension that existed at the time of or after the occurrence of the insured event is generally inadmissible, as this would subsequently devalue the consideration already fully paid by the beneficiary. Since it would be difficult for him to provide a replacement for the lost surviving dependents’ benefits after the occurrence of the pensionable event, at most minor deteriorations would be justified. With the pension scheme, the parties to the collective bargaining agreement created a basis of trust which also binds them in the case of superseding collective bargaining regulations.

Conclusion: With this decision, the BAG first of all confirms that the amendment of collectively agreed pension provisions also extends in principle to pension relationships in which the pension event has already occurred, as the regulatory power of the parties to the collective agreement also extends to pension recipients. The BAG confirms that interventions in pension entitlements are only possible under narrow conditions. This also applies to provisions of collective agreements to which the three-stage examination scheme (BAG ruling dated April 17, 1985, 3 AZR 72/83) does not apply. The examination must be limited to violations of higher-ranking law.

Explore #more

01.12.2023 | PR publications

WiWo: Best of Legal Awards – Philipp Glock Leader of the Year

On Thursday evening, WirtschaftsWoche honored outstanding projects and minds from consulting firms and law firms in Düsseldorf and celebrated the second Best of Professional Night…

29.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights

Energy transition also opens up business opportunities

The energy industry’s complex, capital-intensive transformation process offers investors and banks a great deal of potential By Lars Christian Mahler and Marc Goldberg for Börsen-Zeitung,…

29.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights

Guest article in ZURe – AI and the legal department of tomorrow

The current issue of ZURe (p. 48 ff.) contains a guest article by KPMG Partner Sina Steidel-Küster (Regional Director Southwest, Head of Stuttgart office) and…

29.11.2023 | KPMG Law Insights, KPMG Law Insights

Key Facts about the new draft of the “Data Act

On February 23, 2022, the EU Commission presented the new draft of the so-called Data Act, the “Regulation on harmonized rules for fair access to…

21.11.2023 |

Guest article in ZURe on the implementation of CSRD reporting in SMEs

The current issue of ZURe (p. 34 ff.) contains a guest article by Lena Plato (Director Legal & Compliance, FLABEG Automotive Group GmbH), KPMG Law…

20.11.2023 | Press releases

Statement by KPMG Law experts in Handelsblatt on the topic of sustainability cooperation in antitrust law

In the Handelsblatt, KPMG Law expert Jonas Brueckner is quoted in detail on the subject of cooperation in terms of sustainability. Until this summer, there…

15.11.2023 |

Legal 500 – Country Comparative Guide Germany

Gerrit Rixen and Jonas Brueckner provide an overview of the relevant legal regulations in the area of Competition & Litigation in a practical guide on…

14.11.2023 | Press releases

Tax and Law at a glance – New issue of the digital magazine “Talk

“Talk” stands for Tax and Law Compass, because that’s what the digital magazine wants to be: a navigation aid to the legal and tax aspects…

13.11.2023 |

Statement from KPMG Law experts in Brand eins magazine on the use of AI

The business magazine brand eins asked eight experts about the use of AI in the legal sector. “Many business people cannot even begin to estimate…

10.11.2023 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft advise Ziemann Holvrieka on the acquisition of Künzel Maschinenbau

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Ziemann Holvrieka GmbH from Ludwigsburg on the acquisition of the majority of shares…


Christine Hansen

Senior Manager

Klingelhöferstraße 18
10785 Berlin

tel: +49 30 530199150

© 2023 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.