Search
Contact
03.03.2020 | KPMG Law Insights

Business Continuity Management – How to steer your company through the crisis

Business Continuity Management – How to steer your company through the crisis

Whether a company becomes the target of a cyber attack or operations are interrupted because its own workforce or that of a supplier is absent due to illness, there are a variety of scenarios that challenge a company’s emergency and crisis management. Effective business continuity management enables companies to prepare for crises and, in particular, to clarify in advance legal issues that regularly arise in crisis management. In the following, we would like to draw your attention to some useful crisis prevention measures and their legal implications, and present practical approaches to solving them.

  • Identify which business processes are mandatory for the operation and existence of the company (so-called business impact analysis). In addition to the workforce, it can also be the timely fulfillment of delivery obligations of one of your suppliers, the functionality of your IT system or even the energy supply for your production facilities. Evaluate how long you could do without the critical business processes without putting your company’s existence at immediate risk. Find out at what point it becomes “critical” for the existence of your company and evaluate this criticality, because your actions should be based on this. For example, you will have to react differently to the loss of fifty percent of your workforce than you would if “only” five percent of your employees were absent. You will take different measures in the event of a power failure than in the event of the complete destruction of your production facility by fire.
  • Develop strategies for dealing with the potential failure of an entire division or business process. In doing so, also identify fallback and resupply opportunities and establish restart procedures.

If supply bottlenecks are to be feared in the short term, supply chains must be structured as far as possible to withstand crises. First and foremost, this means that companies should immediately look for alternative providers. However, it should be borne in mind to check the existing contracts to see whether exclusivity agreements, special termination rights or contractual penalties make it more difficult to commission new suppliers or represent an economic risk.

Coordinate with your works council at an early stage on measures requiring co-determination that may have to be implemented in the event of a crisis. From a business perspective, it may be appropriate in individual cases to introduce short-time working, assign employees to other tasks or temporarily change the contractually agreed place of work (e.g. home office). It is true that negotiations between the employer and the works council are reluctant to deal with scenarios that seem unlikely to occur. However, experience also shows that negotiations are made considerably more difficult when there is immediate pressure to act and events in the company are happening at the same time.

  • Establish contingency plans that mirror your strategies. Once the crisis has occurred, it will generally be too late to develop a concept, examine the legal implications and communicate them within the company. Make sure your emergency plan is clearly understood and manageable. In the event of a crisis, defined processes provide security and structure.
  • Crisis management, as a core component of risk management, is the responsibility of management. It must maintain an appropriate business continuity management (BCM) system for crisis situations in order to fulfill its statutory organizational obligations. In doing so, you must be able to answer the following questions:
    • How do you ensure monitoring of crisis risk and occurrence?
    • How is management reporting done and who is responsible for it?
    • By whom is the competent and timely assessment of the situation carried out?
    • How and by whom are concrete options for action developed?
    • How do you ensure that management decisions are always based on sufficient information?
    • Who monitors the implementation of these decisions and by what means?
    • How and by whom is internal and external crisis communication carried out?
    • What are your legal notification and reporting obligations (e.g. data protection or capital market law) and who is responsible for fulfilling them in a crisis?

Responsibilities and roles must be assigned clearly, without overlap and without gaps. The responsible employees must be carefully selected in advance according to competence and instructed on the emergency concepts. Only in this way can a BCM system meet the requirements of a legally effective delegation.

  • In the event of an emergency, form a crisis team (Business Continuity Committee) that includes internal and external representatives with all the necessary competencies. The required competencies result from the specific crisis. Expertise in human resources, IT and communications will be required on a regular basis.
  • Regularly check whether your business impact analysis is still up to date and whether your contingency plans and crisis management organizational structure work in an emergency. Weaknesses are to be analyzed and eliminated.
  • As management, make sure that your crisis management decisions do not leave you open to legal challenge. Always exercise their business judgment in the crisis and in preparation for it without discretionary error.

Explore #more

25.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement: The plans for supply chain law, EUDR and GTC law

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD agreed: “We will also abolish the National Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG).” At first glance,…

17.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the coalition agreement means for the financial sector

The coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and SPD also has an impact on the financial sector. Here is an overview. Increasing the energy supply The…

17.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

AWG amendment provides for tougher penalties for sanction violations

Due to the ongoing Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, the EU wants to make it easier to prosecute violations of EU sanctions. The corresponding…

16.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the new digitization plans in the coalition agreement mean

The coalition agreement shows how the future government wants to shape Germany’s digital future. What do the plans mean for companies in concrete terms? Here…

14.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

How the new coalition wants to accelerate investment in infrastructure

The coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and SPD marks a fundamental new beginning in German infrastructure policy. In view of a considerable investment backlog, the…

14.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025 and NKWS: Booster for environmental and planning law?

In the current coalition agreement, environmental and planning law is mentioned at various points throughout the coalition agreement, highlighting its great importance. However, the…

11.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What’s next for foreign trade? The plans in the 2025 coalition agreement

Foreign trade and foreign trade have become particularly explosive in view of the new US tariffs. The CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed on the following…

11.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025: What the plans mean for the economy

The CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed on a coalition agreement. The central theme is the renewal of the promise of the social market economy. The…

10.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025: Housing construction on the move

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed comprehensive reform plans in the area of housing construction. The aim is to speed…

10.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Energy in the 2025 coalition agreement: what the future government is planning

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD commit to the German and European climate targets and Germany’s climate neutrality by 2045. To this…

Contact

Dr. Bernd Federmann, LL.M.

Partner
Stuttgart Site Manager
Head of Compliance & Corporate Criminal Law

Theodor-Heuss-Straße 5
70174 Stuttgart

Tel.: 0711 781923418
bfedermann@kpmg-law.com

Johanna Friedrichsen

Senior Manager

Luise-Straus-Ernst-Straße 2
50679 Köln

Tel.: +49 30 530199125
jfriedrichsen@kpmg-law.com

Dr. Stefan Middendorf

Partner
Duesseldorf Site Manager

Tersteegenstraße 19-23
40474 Düsseldorf

Tel.: +49 211 4155597316
smiddendorf@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll