Search
Contact
27.04.2015 | KPMG Law Insights

Association of universities criticizes professors’ salaries

Dear Readers,

February is always a short month. Our newsletter adapts to this – at least in terms of the number of articles – for once. The reason is simple, but hopefully will convince you anyway: Not much happened in the month of February. The EU Commission has been reticent with news in the area of education and research, and there is nothing spectacular to report from the “Union framework front” either. But we still have a bit of “EU” for you: As part of the HORIZON 2020 funding program, there is further funding for top researchers who want to bring their innovations to market with the help of a financial injection from the EU.

We also do not want to withhold from you the fact that there has been a critical look at universities by the anti-corruption organization Transparency International. There are fears that the independence of universities will be jeopardized due to their – more or less close – relationships with business. So far so good, criticism can be made fruitful. But if e.g. contract research as a whole is placed under general suspicion because of the financial involvement of commercial enterprises, this is decidedly going too far. The German Rectors’ Conference thinks so, and so do we.

We wish you interesting reading!

Sincerely yours

Public Sector Team of KPMG Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH

Mathias Oberndörfer Dr. Anke Empting

Lawyer Attorney

Three years after a high-profile ruling by the Federal Constitutional Court, the German Association of Universities and Colleges concluded in a study that the structure of professors’ salaries at German universities still needs to be improved.

 

Requirements of the Federal Constitutional Court

In a landmark ruling at the beginning of 2012, in response to a complaint by a Hessian university professor, the Federal Constitutional Court declared the Hessian regulation on the remuneration of professors in grade W 2 to be too low and thus unconstitutional, as it violated the principle of alimentation from Article 33 (2) of the German Constitution. 5 of the Basic Law – i.e. the principle of appropriate, lifelong payment of civil servants. The state of Hesse, whose professors’ salaries were in the middle of the pack compared to the other states, was then called upon to raise the legally stipulated salary level for professors.

Following the ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court, the basic salary of W2 professors was raised throughout Germany. However, in Hesse of all places, the state where the constitutional court ruling originated, this increase was only slight, according to the German Association of Higher Education Institutions.

In order to balance out this divergence to the detriment of Hessian university teachers and to eliminate the locational disadvantage of Hessian universities associated with the salary differences, the German University Association is calling on the Hessian state government to release additional state funds and also to give the universities greater leeway in performance-related pay.

Current legislative project in Berlin

The remuneration of university professors is also currently a controversial topic in the Berlin Senate. In October 2014, a resolution was passed there, initially in response to the requirements of the Federal Constitutional Court ruling, to amend professors’ salaries. According to this, university teachers should only receive more under the performance-based W pay system if they have previously received little or no performance bonuses on their basic salary.

This had led to considerable criticism from the Berlin universities and was amended at the end of January 2015 to the effect that allowances are now paid in all cases to reward special services. In addition, the basic salary of junior professors is to increase by 200 euros. The German Association of Higher Education Institutions points out that this would make the state of Berlin, along with Baden-Württemberg, the only federal state so far to provide for an increase in W1 basic pay as well, in the course of the reform of W pay required by the ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court in February 2012.

Explore #more

04.03.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law expert with statement in dpn magazine on the Location Promotion Act

Shortly after coming into force, the Location Promotion Act is apparently already having a noticeable effect on the investment plans of institutional market participants. In…

25.02.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advised Senstar on the acquisition of Blickfeld

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Senstar group (Senstar) on the acquisition of all shares in Blickfeld GmbH (Blickfeld).…

20.02.2026 | KPMG Law Insights, Legal Financial Services

Consumer Credit Directive (CCD II) tightens rules for the banking industry

The revised Consumer Credit Directive fundamentally reorganizes the consumer credit business. From November 20, 2026, an extended scope of application and significantly stricter requirements will…

20.02.2026 | In the media

Guest article in PERSONALFÜHRUNG: Between tradition and transformation – HR in SMEs

The German SME sector is an exciting learning field for other organizations. Its structural characteristics not only shape the way decisions are made, but also…

19.02.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law advises DKB Finance and DKB Kreditbank on the sale of FMP Forderungsmanagement Potsdam to LOANCOS

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) provided comprehensive legal advice to DKB Finance GmbH and DKB Kreditbank AG on the sale of FMP Forderungsmanagement Potsdam…

17.02.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Establishing complaint management – guidelines for companies and administration

Complaints are great. They show unvarnishedly where processes, communication or services are not working. And even if they initially seem stressful for everyone involved, those…

16.02.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Tenancy law reform 2026 sets tighter framework conditions for landlords

The planned 2026 tenancy law reform limits furnishing surcharges, caps index-linked rents, cuts short-term rental models and tightens the obligations for landlords. The aim is…

16.02.2026 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise the majority shareholders of Kahl GmbH & Co. KG on the sale to the Dutch Paramelt Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) have advised the majority shareholders of Kahl GmbH & Co KG (Kahl), based in…

11.02.2026 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in Die Stiftung – Magazin für Stiftungswesen und Philantrophie: Foundation with question marks

The number of foundations with legal capacity in Germany has been growing for many years. According to a recent survey by the Association of German…

11.02.2026 | KPMG Law Insights

Embedded insurance: What companies should consider when structuring the legal framework

Insurance that fits seamlessly into the purchasing process of a product – such as an extended warranty for an electronic device or travel insurance directly…

Contact

Mathias Oberndörfer

Managing Partner
Geschäftsführer KPMG Law
Bereichsvorstand Öffentlicher Sektor KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Theodor-Heuss-Straße 5
70174 Stuttgart

Tel.: +49 711 781923410
moberndoerfer@kpmg-law.com

© 2026 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll