Search
Contact
18.11.2016 | KPMG Law Insights

Commercial criminal law – SEPA – far-reaching changes in payment transactions as of February 1, 2014

SEPA – far-reaching changes in payment transactions as of February 1, 2014

Transfers and direct debits can only be executed until January 31, 2014 using the procedure that is standard today. Banks may only accept SEPA instruments as of February 1, 2014. Non-compliance threatens problems with all bank transactions, up to and including insolvency.

EU Regulation No. 260 of March 31, 2012, requires mandatory migration to the SEPA (Single Euro Payments Area) payment schemes. If it is not completed in time, no payment transactions can be executed as of February 2014. In the worst case, affected companies face the risk of insolvency – in both the technical and the economic sense. According to current surveys, many companies in Germany have not yet taken the necessary steps to ensure timely SEPA compliance of their payment processes.

Need for action in the construction and real estate sector

Our impression is that many companies in the construction and real estate industry still have a great deal of work to do. SEPA alignment was often classified as a purely interbank issue and as a mere replacement of account number and bank code by IBAN (International Bank Account Number) and BIC (Bank Identifier Code).

All businesses with large numbers of non-cash transactions, such as collecting rent and lease payments, should make sure they have all the necessary data from debtors and creditors to continue to receive and make these payments in a timely manner.

In the future, two different procedures will be available for direct debits for business transactions: the SEPA Core Direct Credit and the SEPA Business to Business Direct Debit. Both are associated with special advantages and requirements. Timely decisions and preparations are therefore necessary.

Swift action is also indicated if a creditor identification number is not yet available for your company today. This is currently the case for an estimated 60% of all companies in Germany. So it’s high time to apply for the creditor ID at the Bundesbank.

Changes to payment processes and IT systems

The generally alarming situation has prompted the Institute of Public Auditors to point out that SEPA directly affects the work of auditors. Management is ultimately responsible for ensuring that changes to payment processes and IT systems that are necessary for the continuation of the Company’s operations are implemented. Each auditor will have to assess in the course of its audit whether possible omissions are so serious that the SEPA timetable can no longer be met. Emerging problems may give rise to a reporting requirement under sec. 321 para. 2 HGB or even have an impact on the auditor’s report.

Explore #more

25.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement: The plans for supply chain law, EUDR and GTC law

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD agreed: “We will also abolish the National Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG).” At first glance,…

17.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the coalition agreement means for the financial sector

The coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and SPD also has an impact on the financial sector. Here is an overview. Increasing the energy supply The…

17.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

AWG amendment provides for tougher penalties for sanction violations

Due to the ongoing Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, the EU wants to make it easier to prosecute violations of EU sanctions. The corresponding…

16.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What the new digitization plans in the coalition agreement mean

The coalition agreement shows how the future government wants to shape Germany’s digital future. What do the plans mean for companies in concrete terms? Here…

14.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

How the new coalition wants to accelerate investment in infrastructure

The coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and SPD marks a fundamental new beginning in German infrastructure policy. In view of a considerable investment backlog, the…

14.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025 and NKWS: Booster for environmental and planning law?

In the current coalition agreement, environmental and planning law is mentioned at various points throughout the coalition agreement, highlighting its great importance. However, the…

11.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

What’s next for foreign trade? The plans in the 2025 coalition agreement

Foreign trade and foreign trade have become particularly explosive in view of the new US tariffs. The CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed on the following…

11.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025: What the plans mean for the economy

The CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed on a coalition agreement. The central theme is the renewal of the promise of the social market economy. The…

10.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Coalition agreement 2025: Housing construction on the move

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD have agreed comprehensive reform plans in the area of housing construction. The aim is to speed…

10.04.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Energy in the 2025 coalition agreement: what the future government is planning

In the coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD commit to the German and European climate targets and Germany’s climate neutrality by 2045. To this…

Contact

Dr. Rainer Algermissen

Partner
Head of Construction and Real Estate Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 3609945331
ralgermissen@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll