Search
Contact
23.10.2019 | KPMG Law Insights

Successor to the Higher Education Pact: “Strengthening the Future Contract on Studying and Teaching”.

Successor to the Higher Education Pact: “Strengthening the Future Contract on Studying and Teaching”.

On May 3, 2019, the Joint Science Conference (GWK) adopted three science packages and agreed on a corresponding federal-state agreement. These are the following three agreements:

– “Strengthening the future contract for studying and teaching”
– “Innovation in university teaching” (previously “Quality Pact for Teaching”)
– “Pact for Research and Innovation

With the “Zukunftsvertrag”, the federal and state governments are pursuing the goal of improving the quality of study and teaching at universities and maintaining study place capacities beyond 2020. The successor to the Higher Education Pact aims in particular to expand permanent employment relationships for staff involved in teaching and learning.

The federal and state governments are thus sending an important signal to science and education: they are prepared to invest more money in Germany as a research location and thus ensure planning security until 2030.

In this regard, the plan calls for a permanent federal commitment to higher education funding. For their part, the states will co-finance 50% of the Future Contract in addition to the basic funding of the universities. Specifically, the agreement provides for annual funding from the federal and state governments of 1.88 billion euros each for the years 2021 to 2023. From 2024, this amount is to be increased to 2.05 billion. The distribution of funds is based on the number of students, graduates and first-year students and consequently must be recalculated annually.

For the years 2021 and 2027, a transitional arrangement applies whereby city states receive a lump sum of 40 million euros, which is, however, shared with the financially weak new federal states and Saarland for the years 2021 and 2022. From 2023, the bulk of the lump sum will then go to the federal capital Berlin, which is to receive 30 of the total 40 million euros from then on.

Every seven years, the states have the opportunity to address state-specific and cross-state challenges and develop implementation strategies within a “consultation process” with the federal government.

The Ministry of Education considers the strict requirements imposed on the states to be a major success. Whereas the Federal Court of Auditors recently criticized the expiring pact on the grounds that the states had not been monitored closely enough with regard to compliance with their requirements and had cheated in many areas, the successor agreement puts a stop to this. According to the new agreement on the future, the states will have to prove their Pact funds separately from their basic funding in the future. If the states do not pay the corresponding funds, the federal government will also reduce the funds accordingly. Conversely, however, this also means for some states, assuming that there was indeed trickery beforehand, that they will spend more funds on the new pact than before – to the delight of the universities. In addition, funds from the pacts should not continue to be “parked” but must be used. Otherwise, they would be reclaimed.

Explore #more

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

On November 13, 2025, the EU Parliament voted on its negotiating position regarding the so-called omnibus package, which provides for a relaxation of the CSRD,…

12.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in In-house Counsel: More stability under the umbrella of corporate governance

There is a lot of talk about “corporate governance” in the face of multiple crises and regulatory tendencies on the part of legislators. But what…

07.11.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group. KPMG Law provided legal…

07.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Changes to the H-1B visa and their consequences for US hiring and secondment practices

President Trump’s administration has introduced two significant changes to the highly popular H-1B visa program for skilled workers: The previous random lottery will be replaced…

07.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement on HAUFE: Confusion surrounding the EU Deforestation Regulation – and what companies should do now

Possibly, perhaps, under certain circumstances, the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) will not be binding for large and medium-sized enterprises on December 30, 2025 and for…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

External personnel: authorities tighten checks with AI support

AI is a blessing for many companies, but it can also quickly become a curse, especially when authorities use the technology to uncover legal violations…

06.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Deforestation regulation – simplification instead of postponement?

In September, the EU Commission wanted to postpone the EUDR deforestation regulation. On October 21, 2025, it published a comprehensive proposal to simplify the EUDR

05.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Employer of Record now not subject to authorization after all – change of heart at BA

On October 1, 2025, the Federal Employment Agency (BA) updated its technical directives and made a U-turn with regard to the so-called employer-of-record model: In…

03.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

CO₂ contracts for difference: Participation in the preliminary procedure is a prerequisite for funding

Companies can apply for funding in the preliminary procedure for the climate protection contracts program until 1 December 2025. The funding from the Federal Ministry…

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll