Search
Contact
03.06.2021 | KPMG Law Insights

Clever succession planning through successive business transfer

Clever succession planning through successive business transfer

Business does not need to be handed over in one fell swoop + Different models possible for gradual transition + Well thought-out design allays business owners’ concerns about transfer to the next generation

Dealing with age, passivity and death discourages many business owners from addressing the issue of succession planning in a timely manner. In addition, there is not infrequently the notion that a company handover must be “all or nothing”. However, German law offers a wealth of opportunities and great flexibility to gradually introduce successors to future tasks and the responsibilities that go with them. This can also be attractive from a tax perspective.

Here are some examples of succession design:

Maintain entrepreneurial influence

Depending on the wishes and possibilities, the entrepreneur can continue to exert influence during the gradual handover. In the case of succession within the family, this can be done, for example, by only partially transferring the assets, taking advantage of the gift tax allowances. Through a multiple voting right or an irrevocable proxy by the donated children, the donor still retains his strong position.

Further profit sharing possible

In many cases, entrepreneurs may wish to transfer shares to the next generation during their lifetime, but the profits are not yet to flow to the donees, or not in full. Here, for example, the donor can have usufruct granted on the company shares given away and thus receive the profits after the gift. Pension solutions are also conceivable, in which the donor receives a recurring monthly payment regardless of the company’s success.

Ripcord recovery right

German law offers the possibility of being able to pull the “ripcord” in the event of a transfer by agreeing a right of recovery. This has several advantages for the Schenker. In this way, the donees will take the agreements from the gift contract and their new role as shareholders seriously. Otherwise, there is a risk that they would have to return their shares in the company. In addition, the entrepreneur can relax when it comes to succession planning. Because if things turn out differently than hoped and agreed, he can correct his decision.

Conclusion: By wisely structuring the transfer of the business, the parties involved can ensure that the next generation is gradually involved. In this way, entrepreneurs can make provisions for the future without suddenly having to hand over all the reins.

Explore #more

26.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

EU deforestation regulation forces companies to act

Anyone who trades in or uses the raw materials soy, oil palm, cattle, coffee, cocoa, rubber and wood and certain products made from them should…

25.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Special infrastructure assets: how the administration manages to implement projects quickly

The special infrastructure fund creates the opportunity to catch up on years of investment backlog. There is a need for urgency. Defence capability, economic growth…

21.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in Real Estate I Haufe: Substitute building materials: “Secondary is not second class”

The Substitute Building Materials Ordinance is intended to harmonize the circular economy in construction, but legal uncertainty and bureaucracy are holding it back. How can…

21.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Residential construction turbo: more living space on existing properties

Since October 30, 2025, new regulations on the creation of living space have been in force in the German Building Code (BauGB). At the heart…

19.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

New Packaging Implementation Act tightens obligations for companies

With a new Packaging Implementation Act (VerpackDG), German law is to be adapted to the EU Packaging Regulation. The Federal Ministry for the Environment…

18.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in the FAZ on the subject of deepfakes

Fraudsters can easily falsify invoices or even act as company bosses. Companies can defend themselves against this, but there are no miracle weapons against AI…

17.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Video surveillance in rental properties: What should landlords be aware of?

Video surveillance of rented properties is only possible under strict legal conditions. More and more owners want to keep an eye on and secure their…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

On November 13, 2025, the EU Parliament voted on its negotiating position regarding the so-called omnibus package, which provides for a relaxation of the CSRD,…

12.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in In-house Counsel: More stability under the umbrella of corporate governance

There is a lot of talk about “corporate governance” in the face of multiple crises and regulatory tendencies on the part of legislators. But what…

Contact

Lars-Alexander Meixner

Partner
Mannheim Site Manager

Glücksteinallee 63
68163 Mannheim

Tel.:
lmeixner@kpmg-law.com

Mark Uwe Pawlytta

Partner
Head of Succession and Foundation Law

THE SQUAIRE Am Flughafen
60549 Frankfurt am Main

Tel.: +49 69 951195012
mpawlytta@kpmg-law.com

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll