Search
Contact
06.12.2022 | KPMG Law Insights

Transparency register and registered associations – need for action?

As of October 2017, the Transparency Register was introduced, and with the turn of the year 2022/23, this will also have a practical relevance for registered associations (e.V.). Their beneficial owners – typically the management board – must be recorded in the transparency register (at the latest) from January 1, 2023.

It is true that the legislator wanted to minimize the workload for associations with an automatic data transfer from the register of associations (Section 20a GwG). What is intended as a work relief for the honorary office and as a reduction of the bureaucratic burden can, however, lead to a fine risk for the e.V. in a large number of cases.

At first glance, there is no need for action: The registering body creates an entry in the transparency register for the registered association without the need for the association’s involvement.

In order to create the automated entries, the register-keeping authority regularly makes assumptions. The data entered on this basis (including the assumptions made) are again valid in accordance with the German Commercial Code (HGB). § 20a para. 1 sentence 4 GwG as information of the association.

The association or the board of directors is then liable for the correctness of the data – because: If these assumptions do not apply or if errors are not corrected by the e.V., a violation of the notification obligation pursuant to § 56 para. 1 S. 1 No. 55 lit. d GwG, which is punishable by a fine.

What entry does the registering authority make and what assumptions does it make?

In the case of automatic registration, all members of the board of directors of an association are recorded as fictitious beneficial owners in the transparency register (Section 20a (1) sentence 2 GwG). The data for this is taken from the register of associations. Special features, such as special rights of a member or member of the Board of Management, which result in an actual economic entitlement, are not taken into account.

If it is not clear from the register of associations in which country the respective member of the Executive Board is domiciled, Germany is always entered in the transparency register as the country of domicile.

In addition, German citizenship is automatically assumed to be the sole citizenship of the members of the Executive Board (Section 20a (1) sentence 3 GwG).

There is a need for action by the e.V. in the following cases:

  • If there are actual beneficial owners (e.g. in the case of voting rights of a member of more than 25 percent, special rights, etc.), the registration of the board members as fictitious beneficial owners is incorrect and therefore a notification to the transparency register of the e.V. is required.
  • If a change in the board of directors was not immediately notified for entry in the register of associations and the data on the board of directors is therefore not up to date, a notification of the e.V. to the transparency register is required.
  • If the principal residence of a member of the Board of Management is abroad, notification must be arranged.
  • If a member of the Board of Management has a foreign nationality or another nationality in addition to German, notification must be made.

Background

With the introduction of a transparency register as of October 2017, in principle also e.V. had to report their beneficial owner to the newly created register. The initial facilitation of the availability of the relevant data in the register of associations (so-called notification fiction) will cease to apply with the conversion of the transparency register to a so-called full register on December 31, 2022. In addition, concessionary (economic) associations are also affected by this.

As a facilitation, the legislator has provided for automatic data transfer from the Transparency Register (as shown above). Automatic registration shall take place for the first time no later than January 1, 2023.

To ”strengthen volunteerism and reduce the bureaucratic burden,” the law provides relief for registered associations. (BT-Drs. 19/30443, p. 67). Pursuant to Section 20a of the German Money Laundering Act (GwG), the office keeping the register creates an entry for registered associations on the basis of the data entered in the register of associations without requiring the association’s cooperation. After January 1, 2023, automatic registration will occur on an event-driven basis. This means that after the initial entry, the entity keeping the register must continuously update the transparency register by adopting the changes resulting from the register of associations. If an association reports changes to its board of directors to the register of associations without delay, the office keeping the register automatically transfers these reports to the transparency register. In this case, a separate notification of the information on the association directors to the Transparency Register is not required, subject to Section 20a para. 2 p. 1 not required. ( Reuter, in: BeckOK-GwG § 20a Rn. 22).

If the registered association fails to notify the register of associations, this will result in an automatic incorrect transfer to the transparency register, which can be attributed to the association. If the transparency register is inaccurate for this reason, there is a threat pursuant to Section 56 para. 1 S. 1 No. 55 lit. d GwG a fine.

Request exemption from the fees of the Transparency Register

The automatic registration of associations in the transparency register does not mean that no annual fees are charged for keeping the transparency register pursuant to Section 24 AMLA. Also the non-profit status has no influence on the obligation to pay fees. However, non-profit associations that have a corresponding certificate from the tax office can be exempted from this fee if they apply for this at the office keeping the register. (BVA, FAQ, as of May 25, 2022, page 30 f.).

For further information or questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Contact us.

Explore #more

21.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Interview in Real Estate I Haufe: Substitute building materials: “Secondary is not second class”

The Substitute Building Materials Ordinance is intended to harmonize the circular economy in construction, but legal uncertainty and bureaucracy are holding it back. How can…

21.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Residential construction turbo: more living space on existing properties

Since October 30, 2025, new regulations on the creation of living space have been in force in the German Building Code (BauGB). At the heart…

19.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

New Packaging Implementation Act tightens obligations for companies

With a new Packaging Implementation Act (VerpackDG), German law is to be adapted to the EU Packaging Regulation. The Federal Ministry for the Environment…

18.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in the FAZ on the subject of deepfakes

Fraudsters can easily falsify invoices or even act as company bosses. Companies can defend themselves against this, but there are no miracle weapons against AI…

17.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Video surveillance in rental properties: What should landlords be aware of?

Video surveillance of rented properties is only possible under strict legal conditions. More and more owners want to keep an eye on and secure their…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Implementing AI in the legal department – these are the success factors

Artificial intelligence (AI) only benefits the legal department if it is implemented correctly. The technology promises to automate time-consuming routine work and fundamentally improve the…

13.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

First omnibus package to relax CSDDD, CSRD and EU taxonomy obligations

On November 13, 2025, the EU Parliament voted on its negotiating position regarding the so-called omnibus package, which provides for a relaxation of the CSRD,…

12.11.2025 | In the media

KPMG Law Statement in In-house Counsel: More stability under the umbrella of corporate governance

There is a lot of talk about “corporate governance” in the face of multiple crises and regulatory tendencies on the part of legislators. But what…

07.11.2025 | Deal Notifications

KPMG Law and KPMG advise Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group

KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH (KPMG Law) and KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG) advised Diehl Defence on the acquisition of the Tauber Group. KPMG Law provided legal…

07.11.2025 | KPMG Law Insights

Changes to the H-1B visa and their consequences for US hiring and secondment practices

President Trump’s administration has introduced two significant changes to the highly popular H-1B visa program for skilled workers: The previous random lottery will be replaced…

Contact

Arndt Rodatz

Partner
Head of Criminal Tax Law

Fuhlentwiete 5
20355 Hamburg

Tel.: +49 40 360994 5081
arodatz@kpmg-law.com

Christian Judis

Senior Manager

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 59976061028
cjudis@kpmg-law.com

Stephanie Haslinger

Manager

Friedenstraße 10
81671 München

Tel.: +49 89 5997606 1029
stephaniehaslinger@kpmg-law.de

© 2024 KPMG Law Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH, associated with KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, a public limited company under German law and a member of the global KPMG organisation of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a Private English Company Limited by Guarantee. All rights reserved. For more details on the structure of KPMG’s global organisation, please visit https://home.kpmg/governance.

 KPMG International does not provide services to clients. No member firm is authorised to bind or contract KPMG International or any other member firm to any third party, just as KPMG International is not authorised to bind or contract any other member firm.

Scroll